I think the point is, we should pick our battles and choose them wisely. Pragmatic and logical pursuits with critical thought ruling the day.
For example, the idea of vetting each and every voter that shows up to the poll. On the face of it it's a GREAT idea. But when you weigh the asset vs. the liability, it just doesn't make any pragmatic sense. I mean, one fraudulent vote is too many, we would all agree. However, in a land of gazillion votes, and any known history of fraud measures in the thousandth's of less than 1%. It would make a lot more sense to first go for the "low hanging" fruit, that is well known in "voter fraud" circles and that would be the efforts of the republican party to slice and dice the voting districts in to measure that give them the clear advantage even without the popular vote. Limiting polling stations, creating long lines in democrat areas, and doing anything they can within the legal realms of dirty politics to limit the votes that would not favor their party. One of those efforts, to suppress democrat voting, is the very topic we are discussing.
Happy Sunday Miss Maggie. These are for you.
View attachment 67213848