• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

How We Created a Virtual Crime Scene to Investigate Syria’s Chemical Attack

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
112,531
Reaction score
102,732
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
How We Created a Virtual Crime Scene to Investigate Syria’s Chemical Attack | New York Times

TELEMMGLPICT000152088105_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqkOwR0iP77jSmoq9t8DUmdpoeWhrs_rFJRBZ2-2XkJAA.jpeg


6/24/18
On the evening of April 7, Syrian military helicopters dropped a chlorine bomb on the rooftop balcony of an apartment building in the opposition-held town of Douma, near Damascus. Dozens of people were sheltering inside as President Bashar al-Assad’s forces waged an intense bombing campaign in a final push to seize control of the rebel enclave. Chlorine is a heavy gas; it sinks into open spaces and displaces air. In high concentrations, it can be lethal. Chlorine has been used as a weapon so frequently in this war that many Syrians know to move to higher ground and find a source of water when they smell it. We counted at least 34 victims spread across two floors and in stairways. Many were found near water sources. Our reporting suggests they moved up into the building, not knowing the bomb was on the rooftop, or that they were walking into a death trap. Their bodies showed horrific signs of chemical exposure. A leaked U.N. report, exclusively obtained by The Times, said 49 were killed, including 11 children. That any chemical attack took place was swiftly denied by Syrian officials and their Russian allies. Proving otherwise became complicated. The Syrian regime prevailed in its military campaign, seizing control of Douma — and the crime scene. Russian police were the first outsiders allowed to visit the site, followed by Russian reporters, who presented their own version of events: They said the building showed no evidence of a chemical attack, and the bomb on the rooftop balcony was placed there in an attempt to stage the so-called attack.

We were unable to visit Douma. But to get to the truth of what happened, we forensically analyzed the visual evidence unwittingly provided by the Russian reports. Combining those pictures with other videos filmed by Syrian activists, we reconstructed a 3-D model of the building, the balcony and the bomb, in partnership with Goldsmiths, University of London research agency, Forensic Architecture. The reconstruction brought a virtual crime scene to us. We could inspect how the bomb related to the trove of visual evidence around it, the debris strewn across the balcony, the bomb’s design, the architecture of the rooftop, the damage inscribed on the bomb’s casing, the hole punctured in the roof, and how the bomb penetrated into the room beneath. Key pieces of evidence indicate that this bomb was not planted, as officials claimed, but dropped from a Syrian military helicopter. The evidence supports chlorine was involved. And it affirmed when it happened — on the evening of April 7, a time frame that is consistent with witness reports and interviews of that day.

The many pages of the article above provide schematic images and an interactive app (use mouse roller) to follow the chlorine bomb and the consequences once it hits the top floor balcony.

Related: Interactive app for the article above | New York Times

Horrific Details on Syria Chemical Attacks Left Out, for Now, From U.N. Report | New York Times
 
NYT is a propaganda outlet of the highest order. Like a dual citizen does, their loyalty to Israeli propaganda comes first.

No mention whatsoever of why on earth a leader who is finally prevailing in the military defense of his country would need or want to drop such stupid and crude weapons on children who are on his side.

Pure propaganda from NYT, again. The local players/victims have told the story about the White Helmets and their arranged "gas attacks", so I guess Israel and NYT must launch a propaganda counter-offensive.
 
NYT is a propaganda outlet of the highest order. Like a dual citizen does, their loyalty to Israeli propaganda comes first.

No mention whatsoever of why on earth a leader who is finally prevailing in the military defense of his country would need or want to drop such stupid and crude weapons on children who are on his side.

Pure propaganda from NYT, again. The local players/victims have told the story about the White Helmets and their arranged "gas attacks", so I guess Israel and NYT must launch a propaganda counter-offensive.

CT Forum is thataway >>>>>>>>
 
CT Forum is thataway >>>>>>>>

With the thread topic, a NYT article pushing conspiracy falsehoods, it's right here, right now. If you must shelter in place avoiding reality, take it up with the OP and NYT.
 
With the thread topic, a NYT article pushing conspiracy falsehoods, it's right here, right now. If you must shelter in place avoiding reality, take it up with the OP and NYT.

Oh, wait, that's right. You're the guy who thinks the Twin Towers are still standing.

Nevermind.
 
Back
Top Bottom