• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

How Many Guns...

Obscurity said:
I never claimed he didn't want gun control..
Click to expand...

Its amazing how you can claim that while at the same trying to use the old anti-2nd amendment trash tactic of trying to claim gun owners were paranoid for thinking Obama was going to take a huge **** on the 2nd amendment.

I asked how many of yours he took.

Clearly the answer is zero.
Click to expand...

How many abortions did Ted Cruz or any other pro-life politcian currently at the federal level stop?
How many free colllege educations and free health care for illegals did any politican at the federal level hand out?

This means you lot and your fake, fictitious, pathetic smears are truly trying to manufacture a crisis,
Click to expand...

There is nothing fake,ficticious or pathetic smears about a politcian who is adamantly anti-2nd amendnent wanting to infringe on the 2nd amendment.

and we all know the SCOTUS isn't going to allow anyone to take your guns
Click to expand...

If an assault weapons ban and "high capacity magazine" ban came to the supreme court now that there is currently nine justicies court how do you think Obama's supreme court justices would vote? Would they vote to uphold those bans or vote to strike it down? I know you won't answer. So I will answer for you. You and I know they would vote to uphold those bans.
 
Harshaw said:
Oh, so it's exactly what jamesrage already said, and already dealt with. You just want to say "neener neener!" even though it's a stupid, juvenile "neener neener," as jamesrage already described.

This is an idiotic failure of a kindergarten-level thread.

But now it's time for you try to counter what jamesrage said. Can you?
Click to expand...

Do you support gun control?
 
jamesrage said:
I warned Trump-tards during the 2016 primaries that he supported anti-2nd amendment laws and donated to liberal democrats and RINO republicans. But Trump-tards used the "But that was yesterday he said that" excuse or some variation of that excuse.
Click to expand...
And Hilary was pro guns?
 
jamesrage said:
I warned Trump-tards during the 2016 primaries that he supported anti-2nd amendment laws and donated to liberal democrats and RINO republicans. But Trump-tards used the "But that was yesterday he said that" excuse or some variation of that excuse.
Click to expand...

Choice A...Choice b. If you are left to choose between the two...would you choose Hillary over Trump?
 
Obscurity said:
of yours did Obama take?

Post it here!
Click to expand...

He certainly tried. From discovery on Fast and Furious documents we know that they wanted the guns used in crimes to spur gun control legislation.
 
VanceMack said:
Choice A...Choice b. If you are left to choose between the two...would you choose Hillary over Trump?
Click to expand...

I voted for neither in the 2016 primary and general election. Because choice A was a piece of **** who I know would trample on the 2nd amendment, open our border to illegals and subject us every stupid pc and social justice nonsense nonsense out there. Choice B was her donor, friend and supported many of the things she supported before he decided he wanted to actually run for president. It seems to me only a moron would knowingly vote for either option in 2016 and it wasn't like we didn't have better choices in the 2016 primaries when there was around a dozen other primary candidates.

That said I will most likely vote for Trump in the 2020 elections because I do like some of the things he is trying to do. He has proved him self a little despite his recent past.
 
Bullseye said:
And Hilary was pro guns?
Click to expand...
I know she wasn't pro-2nd amendment. But considering the fact Trump before 2012 was donating to liberal democrats and RINO republicans IE the establishment. He supported and praised the jobs they were doing.He hung out with the Clintons. Out of all the liberal democrats and RINO republicans he donated to it was Hillary he donated the most to.He is also on record on supporting a ban on semiautomatic firearms under the guise of an assault weapons ban.



BTW I say pro-2nd amendment instead of pro-gun. They are not the same. Because I am sure Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, Diane FIenstien, Queen Elizabeth,Kim Jong Il and every oppressive dictator on the planet and other "elites" are pro-gun when it comes to having guns protect their asses. But they would deny us the average citizen of having the protection of a gun.
 
Obscurity said:
Bye bye bump stocks. I know one guy who lost over $2k on this and won't vote for the idiot in chief thanks to it.
Click to expand...

Oh...so...you disagree with banning bump stocks?
 
Obscurity said:
To be completely clear; I fully support the 2nd amendment and support our rights to own firearms; I don't support irrational fringe ideas like owning rocket launchers, or owning no guns at all. I am against the NRA because they've become essentially a PR firm for the republicans. I support local firearm dealers and local shooting ranges, etc.

But I don't support the fake narrative that the libs are taking your guns, hence the question.

It's a local issue and not a federal issue.
Click to expand...

Liberals aren't taking guns. But they WANT to.
 
jamesrage said:
The logic of anti-2nd amendment trash is since Obama couldn't get the anti-2nd amendment legislation he wanted to sign on his desk them that must mean he isn't anti-2nd amendment.This despite the fact he appointed anti-2nd amendment judges, voted for anti-2nd amendment laws before he was president, supporting anti-2nd amendment laws and praising UK and Australia gun control laws. Using that absurd logic then pro-life politicians aren't really pro-life if they fail to pass any pro-life legislation or any pro-life laws they authored gets struck down by judges.
Click to expand...

So we'll take your non-answer as a zero.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom