• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

How Hannity actively discredits the Mueller probe

Hmmmm....Here's the NYTs article that revealed the existence of a FBI paid informant used by the Obama FBI to SPY on Trumps campaign
In response to this the media and Democrats are arguing semantics, it doesn't help their case in the least.
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/05/...e-trump-russia-fbi-mueller-investigation.html


Here's the WaPo article that revealed the political and financial origins of the Steele dossier....
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wa...6fabf0-b8e4-11e7-a908-a3470754bbb9_story.html

Also James Clapper directed Comey to brief Trump on the dossiers most salacious allegations and now we know why....
Comey?s Memos Indicate Dossier Briefing Of Trump Was A Setup

So CNN could run a hit piece on the President elect

BREAKING: E-mails Show FBI Brass Discussed Dossier Details With CNN

Using banana republic tactics to take down a opposition candidate and then a duly elected President are what concern Americans
The fact that you people are defending this is also concerning

Bingo!

But the Lefties will put their hands over their ears and ignore that reality.
 
Notice Trump lovers can't dispute facts so out comes Clinton. Yawn...

Oh yes!

It's part of Donald Trump and his followers "B-B-But Hillary- B-B-But Obama" fireworks display they shoot off every time the media or anyone else criticizes Donald Trump.

Typical first-grader tactics Trump and his base uses to obstruct justice.
 
Bingo!

But the Lefties will put their hands over their ears and ignore that reality.

Hilarious!

It's more like Donald Trump, his cronies, and his base trying to cover up what everyone else already see and hear with their own eye's and ears!

All part of a coverup! Unfortunately presidents go down for cover-ups!

It's usually not their crimes- it is the cover-ups that take them down!

Stay tuned now, hear? LOL!
 
Matt Gertz, of Media Matters is repairing the leftists site's reputation and turning it back to being a media watchdog. What Hannity is doing should be very concerning to Americans. This is nothing but state propaganda:



MediaMatters | Study: Sean Hannity spent the last year laying the groundwork for an authoritarian response to the Russia probe

Irony. You used one extremely bias entity to bash another extremely bias entity. Exactly the same only the opposite. Pot calling kettle\hypocrisy.
 
Last edited:
Hilarious!

It's more like Donald Trump, his cronies, and his base trying to cover up what everyone else already see and hear with their own eye's and ears!

All part of a coverup! Unfortunately presidents go down for cover-ups!

It's usually not their crimes- it is the cover-ups that take them down!

Stay tuned now, hear? LOL!

Thanks for 100% confirming the premise of my post...

Have a nice day!
 
Oh yes!

It's part of Donald Trump and his followers "B-B-But Hillary- B-B-But Obama" fireworks display they shoot off every time the media or anyone else criticizes Donald Trump.

Typical first-grader tactics Trump and his base uses to obstruct justice.
This ^ is funny.
 
I guess I'm not normal.

When I caught MSNBC misrepresenting a speaker's words (which I knew from discussions here) I stopped watching completely.

Apparently some people would rather put their blinders on rather than reject someone who lies to them.
 
I guess I'm not normal.

When I caught MSNBC misrepresenting a speaker's words (which I knew from discussions here) I stopped watching completely.

Apparently some people would rather put their blinders on rather than reject someone who lies to them.

Many people have rejected Donald Trump- because he is a proven liar!

And then there are many people like you, who approve of his lying, because it fits their political narratives and obvious bias!

It's one of those "Lying to yourself on purpose" sort of things!

Hilarious! LOL!
 
Hannity is a tool.

/thread
 
Hannity has had Sarah Carter, John Solomon and others on who have been instrumental in getting to the truth of ObamaGate.

Attacks law enforcement? ROTFLOL... tell that to law enforcement, they’d howl. The top of the intel community and DoJ have been proven corrupt. This should be exposed, and the perpetrators locked up.

But hey... I enjoy you posting your closed-mindedness and intolerance.

Well done.

Gotta love a Kool-Aid drinker.:lamo:bs:bs:bs:drink
 
Hannity is a propaganda whore. If you listen to the right-wing, Obama forced Hillary and John Brennan to convert to Islam. Hillary sold 20% of our uranium reserves to Russia, Trump is a victim of a a smear campaign of every journalist except those on Fox, the FBI, the CIA, and the Book of the Month Club.
David Brooks has a good column today about how Trump gets his supporters to buy into his fantasy world.

They'll stand at a pristine lake thirsty but won’t drink because Trump says it’s sand, even though they can see the water for themselves.

:applaud:applaud:applaud
 
Irony. You used one extremely bias entity to bash another extremely bias entity. Exactly the same only the opposite. Pot calling kettle\hypocrisy.

uh? Not anything different than what Swampy does on a daily basis, and at least I have facts to back up my point, unlike you.
 
Hmmmm....Here's the NYTs article that revealed the existence of a FBI paid informant used by the Obama FBI to SPY on Trumps campaign
In response to this the media and Democrats are arguing semantics, it doesn't help their case in the least.
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/05/...e-trump-russia-fbi-mueller-investigation.html


Here's the WaPo article that revealed the political and financial origins of the Steele dossier....
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wa...6fabf0-b8e4-11e7-a908-a3470754bbb9_story.html

Also James Clapper directed Comey to brief Trump on the dossiers most salacious allegations and now we know why....
Comey?s Memos Indicate Dossier Briefing Of Trump Was A Setup

So CNN could run a hit piece on the President elect

BREAKING: E-mails Show FBI Brass Discussed Dossier Details With CNN

Using banana republic tactics to take down a opposition candidate and then a duly elected President are what concern Americans
The fact that you people are defending this is also concerning

This article is about Hannity not your very very poor attempt at whataboutism. We are talking about a liar/propagandist who appears to be Swampy's best friend. Got any comment on that at all?
 
uh? Not anything different than what Swampy does on a daily basis, and at least I have facts to back up my point, unlike you.

The facts in my post are indisputable. You used an extremely biased organization owned by crazy Brock to point out that another biased platform is biased. Your point is self destructive. It's sad that you don't even get the point.
 
The facts in my post are indisputable. You used an extremely biased organization owned by crazy Brock to point out that another biased platform is biased. Your point is self destructive. It's sad that you don't even get the point.

This article is about Hannity and how often he lies. Odd you don't seem to want to discuss that, even while admitting bias. I'd like for you to point out how often Mediamatters lies. Then perhaps you'd have something instead of, "I don't like MediaMatters, they are liburals. Hannity is the greatest!!!"
 
This article is about Hannity and how often he lies. Odd you don't seem to want to discuss that, even while admitting bias. I'd like for you to point out how often Mediamatters lies. Then perhaps you'd have something instead of, "I don't like MediaMatters, they are liburals. Hannity is the greatest!!!"

I don't listen to either one of them. Too much bias from both of them for me. If you want to carry on about how your bias isn't bias because it's a better bias then go on with that. It's your stupid premise. It isn't mine.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/dems-to-david-brock-stop-helping-you-are-killing-us

But the friction between Brock and Democrats is not merely limited to its more progressive faction—many alumni of Obama’s campaigns and White House, as well as Hillary Clinton’s failed 2016 run, say they want Brock to stay far away from the Democrats’ future plans.
Another senior 2016 Clinton aide, who asked not to be named because the ex-staffer did “not want to deal with Brock’s bull****,” described Brock and his organizations in 2016 as “useless—you might as well have thrown those [tens of] millions of dollars down a well, and then set the well on fire.”
“I met with him a couple times—he’s ****ing weird,” a former Obama administration official, who also requested anonymity, told The Daily Beast. “I felt like I was meeting Mugatu from Zoolander… I don’t know what the **** [Brock’s network] did besides raise a ton of money, and I don’t think the after-action report on 2016 says we need more David Brock. Probably the opposite is true.”
 
I don't listen to either one of them. Too much bias from both of them for me. If you want to carry on about how your bias isn't bias because it's a better bias then go on with that. It's your stupid premise. It isn't mine.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/dems-to-david-brock-stop-helping-you-are-killing-us

Hmmm. I thought you would support an over-exaggerator. Since you seem to defend everything Swampy and Hannity do.

The truth of the matter is. You had to go back a year to find an article w/a handful of Democrats saying Brock should stop trying to help Democrats because he doesn't understand how to prop up Democrats. Bannon to Brock would be a better comparison. IMO.

Anyway, Brock didn't even do this research, it was Matt Gertz and he was the one that went through Hannity's show and pointed out his lies. I follow his twitter account and he is very accurate in tracking Fox News talking points and linking them w/Swampy tweets. Often it's an hour or two after the Fox News segment that Swampy tweets out, sometimes word for word (and only occasionally giving the people who said it credit).

I find it funny that you have more of a problem w/ a liberal Democrats can't stand rather than a right wing talk show host who spouts conspiracy theories about Mueller to Swmapy every night and then afterwards they talk about it for hours...
 
Hmmm. I thought you would support an over-exaggerator. Since you seem to defend everything Swampy and Hannity do.

The truth of the matter is. You had to go back a year to find an article w/a handful of Democrats saying Brock should stop trying to help Democrats because he doesn't understand how to prop up Democrats. Bannon to Brock would be a better comparison. IMO.

Anyway, Brock didn't even do this research, it was Matt Gertz and he was the one that went through Hannity's show and pointed out his lies. I follow his twitter account and he is very accurate in tracking Fox News talking points and linking them w/Swampy tweets. Often it's an hour or two after the Fox News segment that Swampy tweets out, sometimes word for word (and only occasionally giving the people who said it credit).

I find it funny that you have more of a problem w/ a liberal Democrats can't stand rather than a right wing talk show host who spouts conspiracy theories about Mueller to Swmapy every night and then afterwards they talk about it for hours...

I don't watch Fox News at all. Where have I backed ANYTHING that Hannity said? I don't watch Hannity. He drives me nuts. He jumps to conclusions. He repeats himself in that weird mantra thing that he does. Do yourself a favor and back away from the broad brush. You might break an ankle jumping to conclusions. I notice that not one of your posts actually denies that Brock is bias. You rationalize that your preferred bias source isn't actually bias because your bias is better. That's lame.
 
Last edited:
Matt Gertz, of Media Matters is repairing the leftists site's reputation and turning it back to being a media watchdog. What Hannity is doing should be very concerning to Americans. This is nothing but state propaganda:



MediaMatters | Study: Sean Hannity spent the last year laying the groundwork for an authoritarian response to the Russia probe

How many times must it be explained? If you question the fairness if Fox, you are just a communist who wants America to lose.
 
I don't watch Fox News at all. Where have I backed ANYTHING that Hannity said? I don't watch Hannity. He drives me nuts. He jumps to conclusions. He repeats himself in that weird mantra thing that he does. Do yourself a favor and back away from the broad brush. You might break an ankle jumping to conclusions. I notice that not one of your posts actually denies that Brock is bias. You rationalize that your preferred bias source isn't actually bias because your bias is better. That's lame.

I never said Brock isn't biased, I said Brock isn't as bias as Hannity. This is apples and oranges. Brock is not very good at picking winning Democrats so Democrats hate him for getting involved in politics in that way. Swampy is also really bad at picking Republicans, but Hannity loves Swampy and speaks to him every night, While they brag about how much of the Republican Party they control via their lies. See the difference?

Also why is it that every time I point out conservative hypocrisy someone always tells me I should take a break from doing it??? hmmmmmm.... Maybe I'm getting to them (you).
 
Matt Gertz, of Media Matters is repairing the leftists site's reputation and turning it back to being a media watchdog. What Hannity is doing should be very concerning to Americans. This is nothing but state propaganda:



MediaMatters | Study: Sean Hannity spent the last year laying the groundwork for an authoritarian response to the Russia probe

Of course he and Trump and his Trumpetts are going to discredit it and obstruct; they're up to their necks in this thing and the nooses are getting closer.
 
So 2 lies from last year vs the thousands that Hannity has told??? You aren't winning this discussion.
I dont know of any lies from hannity. You keep claiming that but i see no evidence he has lied about anything.

I do think its funny that your acting so outraged by hannitys bias but you dont act that way over the medias extreme anti-trump bias or the extreme bias of those investigating trump.

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top Bottom