How did Trump Overcome Genital Grabbing Scandal?

[yankintx]

disagree, the right would just create a new story to explain it

First they would have to find a gay man to sleep with him, we are rather picky, I for one would not give him a second look, with that hair, 42 inch waist, and rather large caboose, no thanks, I can, and have done better lol.

 

[Spartacus FPV]

One simple question: why was this possible?

I would imagine a lot of nose holding for the sake of the supreme court.

 

[blackjack50]

so what you are saying is its ok for trump to be sleazy because clinton was sleazy?

Did I stutter? Did I state anything else? No. Spare me the "well are just excusing this because you brought up something that properly countered my argument" crap. He tried to play it off that trumps behavior is a "conservative" thing. It isn't. Not by a long shot. And old slick Willy is a great example of a sexist abuse of power on the left. Thus demonstrating that politicians, especially Feds, are nothing more than asshat frat boys acting like they are somehow more important than anyone else on the planet.

What we need is a ****ing hunger games of politicians. It would be awesome.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[katzgar]

Did I stutter? Did I state anything else? No. Spare me the "well are just excusing this because you brought up something that properly countered my argument" crap. He tried to play it off that trumps behavior is a "conservative" thing. It isn't. Not by a long shot. And old slick Willy is a great example of a sexist abuse of power on the left. Thus demonstrating that politicians, especially Feds, are nothing more than asshat frat boys acting like they are somehow more important than anyone else on the planet.

What we need is a ****ing hunger games of politicians. It would be awesome.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

you are not making an argument you are just trying to deflect from Trumps sleazy actions.

 

[blackjack50]

you are not making an argument you are just trying to deflect from Trumps sleazy actions.

No. I'm not. You are trying to ignore the fact that the left is just as guilty as the right. There is no excuse for the behavior. Doesn't matter who it is. My statement was a direct response to someone trying to make this a "democrat vs republican" thing. It isn't.

Btw

I didn't vote for Trump. You won't get a more unbiased and honest opinion on the Clinton campaign donor.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Fishking]

Wha? I didn't even suggest that.

Rofl...don't make eye-contact and slowly back away.

 

[Fishking]

To this day one of the things I find several steps beyond jaw dropping amazing is that Trump won the election despite the worst publicity ever garnered by and major party candidate which severely should have assassinated his character - and by that I mean he ***** grabbing comments that took over the campaign and must have been heard by at least 90% of voters.

What amazes me is this: I cannot think of one single candidate for either party in the last 100 years in a relatively close election who could have survived that and won. Not one.

Sure, LBJ in 64 could have done it..... Nixon in 72 would have won despite such comments. But both had such huge leads and their opponents were so marginalized that nothing could have helped them. But in an election where the difference was around five points or so in polls, I cannot see any candidate surviving such devastating publicity.

But Trump did and managed to put together enough states to win the EC and the office.

One simple question: why was this possible?

How was this possible?

Because Hillary has an entire history of attacking the women who were assaulted by her husband and she stood by the Sexual Assaulter in Chief his entire life, which had him assaulting and harassing women for decades and she enabled it.

So with neither side really having any high-ground here, that distinction became a wash and other variable came into play as more important, like it being a change election and she is the worst candidate of all time and also didn't represent change.

 

[haymarket]

When? I don't remember personal character being more important than policy in my lifetime. Perhaps in some dream you had?

Tell me how the policy statements of Eisenhower in 52 and 56 were superior to those of Stevenson.

Ike was elected on pure character - nothing else.

 

[haymarket]

LOL

So you really have nothing, but feel compelled to provide some kind of reply.

SOP haymarket.

You are the one with a completely non-substantive reply.

 

[haymarket]

How was this possible?

Because Hillary has an entire history of attacking the women who were assaulted by her husband and she stood by the Sexual Assaulter in Chief his entire life, which had him assaulting and harassing women for decades and she enabled it.

So with neither side really having any high-ground here, that distinction became a wash and other variable came into play as more important, like it being a change election and she is the worst candidate of all time and also didn't represent change.

sounds like yet another right wing dog whistle issue that means something only to those on the right.

 

[jimbo]

To this day one of the things I find several steps beyond jaw dropping amazing is that Trump won the election despite the worst publicity ever garnered by and major party candidate which severely should have assassinated his character - and by that I mean he ***** grabbing comments that took over the campaign and must have been heard by at least 90% of voters.

What amazes me is this: I cannot think of one single candidate for either party in the last 100 years in a relatively close election who could have survived that and won. Not one.

Sure, LBJ in 64 could have done it..... Nixon in 72 would have won despite such comments. But both had such huge leads and their opponents were so marginalized that nothing could have helped them. But in an election where the difference was around five points or so in polls, I cannot see any candidate surviving such devastating publicity.

But Trump did and managed to put together enough states to win the EC and the office.

One simple question: why was this possible?

For me it's a case of the boy crying wolf several times too often. I no longer bother with much of what the left tries to pin on President Trump.

 

[Fishking]

sounds like yet another right wing dog whistle issue that means something only to those on the right.

Sounds like a vapid attempt to dismiss a reality that doesn't fit with your preconceived world view and therefore cognitive dissonance comes to play, short-circuiting reasoned thought, which results in the garbage response quoted above.

 

[MaggieD]

To this day one of the things I find several steps beyond jaw dropping amazing is that Trump won the election despite the worst publicity ever garnered by and major party candidate which severely should have assassinated his character - and by that I mean he ***** grabbing comments that took over the campaign and must have been heard by at least 90% of voters.

What amazes me is this: I cannot think of one single candidate for either party in the last 100 years in a relatively close election who could have survived that and won. Not one.

Sure, LBJ in 64 could have done it..... Nixon in 72 would have won despite such comments. But both had such huge leads and their opponents were so marginalized that nothing could have helped them. But in an election where the difference was around five points or so in polls, I cannot see any candidate surviving such devastating publicity.

But Trump did and managed to put together enough states to win the EC and the office.

One simple question: why was this possible?

It was locker room talk that should never have been made public.

 

[reinoe]

Tell me how the policy statements of Eisenhower in 52 and 56 were superior to those of Stevenson.

Ike was elected on pure character - nothing else.

That wasn't in my lifetime, but I'm glad Eisenhower won because he's the type of president that looks better with time and is in my all-time top 5 presidents.

 

[Absentglare]

Excuses. My statement stands. Bill Clinton just lied under oath. After getting a ****ing blow job in the Oval Office by a friggin intern. Yea that doesn't SCREAM inappropriate and abuse of power either. :eye roll:


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You misunderstand. The criticism is that they voted for President Trump after condemning benign **** like extramarital, but consensual, affairs.

 

[Nilly]

Because sexual assault against women is normalized in our culture and frankly most Americans don't give a **** about it.

Sexual assault simply isn't a dealbreaker for people.

 

[reinoe]

Because sexual assault against women is normalized in our culture and frankly most Americans don't give a **** about it.

Sexual assault simply isn't a dealbreaker for people.

Should a man's life be ruined by the false accusation of sexual assault? Where were these women for 20 years? They didn't realize Trump had sexually assaulted them in the past? Were they suffering from some for mm of amnesia, or were they simply looking for a payday? Where are they now? Why did they disappear after Hillary's team stopped paying them?

 

[BillRM]

Maybe given the results of this election it would be a good idea to check the red states drinking water supplies to see their average lead levels.

 

[katzgar]

For me it's a case of the boy crying wolf several times too often. I no longer bother with much of what the left tries to pin on President Trump.

you are emotionally unavailable.

 

[Lutherf]

To this day one of the things I find several steps beyond jaw dropping amazing is that Trump won the election despite the worst publicity ever garnered by and major party candidate which severely should have assassinated his character - and by that I mean he ***** grabbing comments that took over the campaign and must have been heard by at least 90% of voters.

What amazes me is this: I cannot think of one single candidate for either party in the last 100 years in a relatively close election who could have survived that and won. Not one.

Sure, LBJ in 64 could have done it..... Nixon in 72 would have won despite such comments. But both had such huge leads and their opponents were so marginalized that nothing could have helped them. But in an election where the difference was around five points or so in polls, I cannot see any candidate surviving such devastating publicity.

But Trump did and managed to put together enough states to win the EC and the office.

One simple question: why was this possible?

Could it be because every time a Republican candidate seems to be making headway the Democrats (or other Republicans) manage to find a whole bevy of "victims" of that candidate? It's all just been so overdone and with so much disregard for credibility of the accusers that it all falls flat.

There's an old story about this boy who keeps crying "Wolf!" that, perhaps, the Democrats should review.

 

[joG]

in other words you dont much care about sleazy

What was sleazy about this. Immature and ill mannered yes. But sleazy is to lie about not having had sex with the woman.

 

[jimbo]

you are emotionally unavailable.

Brilliant post. Do you have a speechwriter? Or do you dream this up all on your own?

 

[polgara]

Could it be because every time a Republican candidate seems to be making headway the Democrats (or other Republicans) manage to find a whole bevy of "victims" of that candidate? It's all just been so overdone and with so much disregard for credibility of the accusers that it all falls flat.

There's an old story about this boy who keeps crying "Wolf!" that, perhaps, the Democrats should review.

Greetings, Lutherf. :2wave:

Well said! :thumbs: After hearing the same blah, blah, blah so many times, one tends to tune the noise out after a while, whether it's factual or not!

 

[humbolt]

just another attempt to defend Trump. you have a tough future ahead of you.

Defending the truth. You were the one blabbing about reality, and I thought I'd try to acquaint you with it. Probably a lost cause.

 

[katzgar]

Brilliant post. Do you have a speechwriter? Or do you dream this up all on your own?

the classic definition