It's subjective only if you've accepted a hedonistic worldview. Some of us desire more than mere pleasure.
There are different forms of love. I'm saying that sex should never exclude the possibility of procreation. Any time that end is frustrated is a spurning of the natural purpose of the act. It's akin to bulimia.
Excuse my spelling.
Actually yes. Anything not PiV sex is sodomy.
Well this answers my earlier question.
So the children that have lost both of their parents can never be back in an non-deficient situation, according to your logic. So what? Just let them stay orphaned and in the system, instead of them getting loving homes where 2 or more parental units might be of the same sex?
Better and worse are always subjective values no matter what your world view is. Some might consider it a better world if we brought back stoning and parental arranged marriages.
It speaks to a lack of commitment.
't
Yeah, and pursuing nothing but the next orgasm is the highest pursuit one can engage in.
Since they by nature cannot have children, such an arrangement would be nonsensical.
Our society's current approval of degenerate sexual practices is a part of our culture's overall degradation into hedonism.
Them getting married is at best odd. Still, this wouldn't mean that those already married at that age should stop having sex. It's not as if by nature their intercourse is barren.
