• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

How badly would JD Vance destroy Kamala Harris in a debate

How badly?

  • With the moderators help she would hold her own

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    11
What makes you think Kamala can win a contested Democrat Primary? Will Democrats clear the field for a twice failed candidate?
This is exactly why the OP is a fail.
Harris stepped up due to circumstances. Collective stupidity set in and put a felon in the WH.
I highly doubt she will run again.
I am very proud of how ladylike she handled herself. She bowed out gracefully, unlike the felon who caused the 1/6 riot.
 
Don't show us any more ass, we'll go blind from the ugly. By the way, there are very successful married women who have no children. They are not white baby factories to please rightwing simpletons. Your outlook on life is unreal, how sad for you.
Thank you.
 
"Just how awesome is lil' JD?"

1) SO bigly awsome!
2) I get a thrill up my leg just seeing eyeliner for sale!
3) He would destroy Pope Leo in a righteousness rap battle!
4) "Hillbilly Elegy" is the first book I ever added to my Amazon wish list!
5) *SPOOLSH*
6) He makes me want to be a manly man!
6) I am a wee girly kommanyst vegan transgender who hates 'Murica, my Momma, and Baby Jesus.

Choose only one, vote visible to all.
7) Who wears more eye make-up?
 
hillbillies aren't the same as klansmen. hillbillies are not racists by and large. and the poverty of Appalacia is not attractive to the klan
 
But it was not. Your unfounded presumption was clear though.

Words have specific meanings and language can and does convey nuance. Sometimes subtle, other times obvious.

The instance you are questioning was the latter.

If there were a lineup of white men, and I had to guess who was the Klansman on looks alone, JD Vance would be my pick.

What does a Klansman look like?

I don't think I could pick the liquor store robber out of a lineup of black men on looks alone. It might be a useful skill, but I don't believe it exists in reality.

I have to admit I've heard the same sentiment from others though. I've heard things like: "She looks like a whore!"
 
If there were a lineup of white men, and I had to guess who was the Klansman on looks alone, JD Vance would be my pick.

What does a Klansman look like?

I don't think I could pick the liquor store robber out of a lineup of black men on looks alone. It might be a useful skill, but I don't believe it exists in reality.

I have to admit I've heard the same sentiment from others though. I've heard things like: "She looks like a whore!"
IF.

English my friend.

Edit: "If ET landed in my back yard, I would assume it was coming to kidnap Drew Barrymore and would ahoot it on the spot"
 
Vance.....Vance....

Jumped up and down.....and then shit in his pants........


🤷‍♂️
 
IF.

English my friend.

If there were a lineup. Why would Vance stand out from the others as an obvious Klansman? Especially if he isn't a Klansman at all? What is "the look" that gives it away?

"If there were a lineup of women and I had to guess which was the whore, Kamala Harris would be my pick."

Just as indefensible.
 
If there were a lineup of white men, and I had to guess who was the Klansman on looks alone, JD Vance would be my pick.

What does a Klansman look like?

I don't think I could pick the liquor store robber out of a lineup of black men on looks alone. It might be a useful skill, but I don't believe it exists in reality.

I have to admit I've heard the same sentiment from others though. I've heard things like: "She looks like a whore!"
having been to one -only one - klan meeting ( because i wanted sex with a cute blonde who insisted I go) i can only say they were a pathetic lot. all this stuff about racial purity just makes them sound dated and impotent.. they dont have any power anymore either.

I had a good time in the West Virginia mountains with some hillbillies. they like to get wasted..there isn't much else to do back country..lol
 
Funny thread. Pumping up Vance as if he had a clue.
The fake hillbilly has had his moment in the sun.
He’s a dud.
Not one likes him.
 
having been to one -only one - klan meeting ( because i wanted sex with a cute blonde who insisted I go) i can only say they were a pathetic lot. all this stuff about racial purity just makes them sound dated and impotent.. they dont have any power anymore either.

I had a good time in the West Virginia mountains with some hillbillies. they like to get wasted..there isn't much else to do back country..lol

Speaking of which...maybe bbl.
 
If there were a lineup. Why would Vance stand out from the others as an obvious Klansman? Especially if he isn't a Klansman at all? What is "the look" that gives it away?

"If there were a lineup of women and I had to guess which was the whore, Kamala Harris would be my pick."

Just as indefensible.
I would take your statement to be an unsubstantiatable farce, in precise accordance to how I took the one you are vociferously railing about.

"IF"
 
I look around and think, is this the best the USA can come up with? Donald Trump as the Supreme Leader. In their quest to maintain power, the Oligarchy has its modern-day puppet dancing to the rhythm of a false prophet. The Anti-Christ with so many more issues designed to influence the minds of millions using propaganda.

What is clear is that this Sublime has assumed control of America using fear and hopelessness, to be addressed by a cult known as MAGA, Patriots, Republicans, and many far-right deceptions used to divide and conquer the masses. It is called Project 2025. And it has deep roots in all the branches of the US Government.

The four pillars that Trump used to gain his place as the Beast ( Anti-Christ): Division - Distraction - Depression - Destruction.

A petition to GOD as we know and understand: Oh Father, Forgive US for our sins.

Stars.webp
 
He would destroy her !
Vance answers questions DIRECTLY, and clears up the lies /propaganda / liberal Spin as he's answering the questions!.....

Kamal the Word Salad Queen , doesn't really answer any questions, even the softball left biased ones!

So for ANY HONEST person watching they would see that harris is a corrupt lying hack, and that Vance respects Americans enough to give them a straight answer and not care if some people don't like the answer !
 
lol..cackles would defeat herself with laughter
 
I would take your statement to be an unsubstantiatable farce, in precise accordance to how I took the one you are vociferously railing about.

"IF"

I'm not in the habit of making statements that are "unsubstantiatable farce". Maybe the other poster is.

I made one comment about the statement initially. All others have been in response to posters having some sort of contention with that. Without that, my initial statement would have been the end of it. Hardly "vociferously railing".
 
I don't know who the democrats will nominate, but I'll make a thread for other possibilities.

My honest opinion of Vance purely as to whether he would make a good candidate for the GOP in 2028 is mixed.

On one hand, he is articulate and intelligent when it comes to expressing his views, and he is very attuned to the underlying beliefs of the modern right and their concerns about demographics, immigration, transgender, interventionism, and so on.

But hes also almost purely a culture warrior with a largely incomprehensible foreign and economic policy when compared to traditional left-right distinction in American politics. It seems like he would be a much better primary candidate than a general one.
 
JD Vance is everything she hates.

Vance is an eye-liner wearing politico who has acknowledged the influence of Catholic theology on his sociopolitical positions.

P.S. Ms. Harris isn't running for national office again so this poll is moot.
 
I don't know who the democrats will nominate, but I'll make a thread for other possibilities.

Let's be honest. Donald Trump isn't good at debate. He tries to talk over his opponent. He doesn't prepare. His victory over Kamala last September was a result of her not being able to say anything of substance. Him beating Biden was because Biden is senile. He lost to both Hillary and Biden in 2016 and 2020.

JD is a skilled debater. Tim Walz knew he was so badly beaten that he tried to use the noise from a pizza oven to drown out questions about his performance. JD proved he knew more about immigration, climate change, foreign policy, etc within 15 minutes.

He's quick with responses as well. Trump has a tendency to get frustrated. He had Martha Raddatz talking circles.



He's also going to be hard to attack using typical democrat methods. You can't use his wealth. His mom was a drug addict and he didn't have a dad. He had to fund his undergraduate education by joining the military and using the GI Bill. You can't use his privilege. He didn't have connections to Yale. He applied for scholarships and loans to pay for law school. It won't be Barack Obama calling out Mitt Romney.


Why don't you first do a poll asking who wants Harris to be the nominee? If someone says yes, then you might ask about the debates. But first, I'm not sure what makes you think Harris will run again?
 
I don't know who the democrats will nominate, but I'll make a thread for other possibilities.

Let's be honest. Donald Trump isn't good at debate. He tries to talk over his opponent. He doesn't prepare. His victory over Kamala last September was a result of her not being able to say anything of substance. Him beating Biden was because Biden is senile. He lost to both Hillary and Biden in 2016 and 2020.

JD is a skilled debater. Tim Walz knew he was so badly beaten that he tried to use the noise from a pizza oven to drown out questions about his performance. JD proved he knew more about immigration, climate change, foreign policy, etc within 15 minutes.

He's quick with responses as well. Trump has a tendency to get frustrated. He had Martha Raddatz talking circles.



He's also going to be hard to attack using typical democrat methods. You can't use his wealth. His mom was a drug addict and he didn't have a dad. He had to fund his undergraduate education by joining the military and using the GI Bill. You can't use his privilege. He didn't have connections to Yale. He applied for scholarships and loans to pay for law school. It won't be Barack Obama calling out Mitt Romney.

OFFS.
 
Why don't you first do a poll asking who wants Harris to be the nominee? If someone says yes, then you might ask about the debates. But first, I'm not sure what makes you think Harris will run again?
Great signature: "I'm ashamed of what America is."

I'm troubled when I realize there are some so-called Americans who live in this great country. I would think that if someone was ashamed of his/her country, he/she would be thinking of leaving for a country more aligned with his/her beliefs.
 
Not sure why this poll is relevant. Harris will not be the nominee in 2028, and there is a good chance that JD won't either.
 
Not sure why this poll is relevant. Harris will not be the nominee in 2028, and there is a good chance that JD won't either.
And there is a good chance JD Vance's popularity could increase by 2028.
The Eagles beat the Patriots in the Super Bowl in 2018.
Who would've thought that?
We have plenty of time to see if the Democrats continue to be befuddled and clueless as to what they need to do.
 
And there is a good chance JD Vance's popularity could increase by 2028.
The Eagles beat the Patriots in the Super Bowl in 2018.
Who would've thought that?
We have plenty of time to see if the Democrats continue to be befuddled and clueless as to what they need to do.
Something will have to change then.


On January 20—the day of Vance's inauguration—43 percent of registered voters viewed him favorably,
while 51 percent held an unfavorable view, giving him a net approval rating of -8.

As of August 1, those numbers have worsened. Just 42 percent now view Vance favorably, while 54
percent view him unfavorably, widening his net disapproval to -12 points.

Other polls reflect the same trend. Atlas showed that Vance's favorability fell from 49 percent in January
to 44 percent in July, with unfavorability rising to 55 percent. YouGov/Economist also reported a decline,
from 39 percent favorable and 45 percent unfavorable in January to 37 percent favorable and 51 percent
unfavorable in July.
 
Back
Top Bottom