House Intelligence Committee in possession of video, audio recordings from Giuliani associate Lev Pa

[HenryChinaski]

I love these stories. They're always a big headline followed by lots of speculation and very little substance.

I see you're skeptical, that's fine. Maybe we can crack out the scorecard of those associated with Trump that are behind bars so far?

 

[CaughtInThe]

Well, with Watergate you at least had a break in. At this point all Schiff has is a bunch of bureaucrats who got their noses out of joint and his own theory about Trump's intent. He has presented NOTHING that ties the Biden investigation to the 2020 campaign and, in fact, he asked Zelensky to coordinate with Barr's investigation into 2016.

Look, it's pretty much a given that Schiff is going to put articles of impeachment on Nadler's desk. What happens from there is anybody's guess but it will be something to see if the House votes to impeach with no Republican support whatsoever. That will DEFINITELY be entertaining.

What's really funny is republicans said that democrats had nothing all throughout Watergate. From basically start till finish.

That's just too delicious.

 

[apdst]

But it would hardly be of any benefit to Parnas's hope of getting a deal from the SDNY (which must be part of his motivation for giving these things up as well as the fact that ****bag betrayed him by claiming he didn't know who he was) if he gave the committee garbage.

If he gave it Congress, it means there's no evidence of a crime.

 

[apdst]

Trump's memo of the call (not a transcript) mentions the Bidens. There was no "investigation" into the Bidens. You have Trump's personal attorney getting dirt on them to help Trump when and if he is opposed by Biden.

Hunter Biden has nothing to do with the 2016 election.

And we know what will happen. The Republican Senate will ignore the crystal clear quid pro quo and not vote to remove Trump. And when a Democrat even thinks about pulling a stunt like this, you and the other citizens of Trump Fan Nation will howl like scorched cats, and the smart people will remind you of this.

Guiliani is a private citizen. He can dig up dirt on anyone he wants.

 

[apdst]

If the tapes show Trump raping and murdering school children, his approval will drop down to 41%. Two weeks later, it will return to 43%.

But it don't. Does it?

 

[apdst]

You have to learn patience. It was a long time between when the republicans planned the break in at the Watergate building and when they're was finally proof of the things that Nixon did.

Of course we're living in the instant gratification era so everybody wants everything wrapped up in 30 minutes.

Yeah, it was 18 months. They been going after Trump for over three years.

 

[Cardinal]

How ****ed up is that?

It's the historical pattern. A small percentage of Trump's base is horrified by something he does. Then they make their peace with it and move on. There's no reason to think this won't go on forever.

That's actually a good argument for why one should never, ever concern oneself with how trump supporters think about anything. Even the "reachable" among them aren't reachable.

 

[ocean515]

I love these stories. They're always a big headline followed by lots of speculation and very little substance.

As long as their target audience mentally masturbates with them, they can keep the doors opened for another day.

 

[trouble13]

Word I'm getting from highly placed, highly credible and impeccably qualified, albeit anonymous, sources is that the videos will show Parnas, Giuliani and Fruman peeing on a hotel bed in Moscow which Barack Obama once slept in. In the corresponding audio transcripts they discuss how they will blame the pee on Russian hookers and then leaking the information to certain UK investigators. While there is no direct ti to Trump in any of this the careful listener will hear references to "The Don" and "The Orange Comet" which might, perhaps, be references to Trump. The evidence in these tapes, according to sources, is sufficient to warrant the appointment of a special prosecutor and could be thoroughly only if Trump's tax returns are released to the public.

Sm i the only one to find your refrences to pee tapes and leaking hilarious

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

 

[trouble13]

I love these stories. They're always a big headline followed by lots of speculation and very little substance.

Its only a big headline when it portrays republicans negatively when its a prominent democrat like jeffery Epstein then every precaution is used to protect journalistic integrity and standards.

Who exactly do they they think they are fooling?

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

 

[What if...?]

But it would hardly be of any benefit to Parnas's hope of getting a deal from the SDNY (which must be part of his motivation for giving these things up as well as the fact that ****bag betrayed him by claiming he didn't know who he was) if he gave the committee garbage.

Parnassus isn't the best witness, it he appears to be a professional hood and they often actually have insurance policies.

 

[yankintx]

Word I'm getting from highly placed, highly credible and impeccably qualified, albeit anonymous, sources is that the videos will show Parnas, Giuliani and Fruman peeing on a hotel bed in Moscow which Barack Obama once slept in. In the corresponding audio transcripts they discuss how they will blame the pee on Russian hookers and then leaking the information to certain UK investigators. While there is no direct ti to Trump in any of this the careful listener will hear references to "The Don" and "The Orange Comet" which might, perhaps, be references to Trump. The evidence in these tapes, according to sources, is sufficient to warrant the appointment of a special prosecutor and could be thoroughly only if Trump's tax returns are released to the public.

Oversight sucks if one is guilty.

 

[DiAnna]

They're anonymous and, for the sake of their personal safety, have asked that I not reveal their positions...or even that they have positions. As you know, if their identity was discovered it would be a matter of seconds before Trump and his supporters ruined their lives.

Your posts used to be sane and normal; when and why did that change?

 

[VanceMack]

Sooooo...I suppose Schiff is keeping this in his own personal stash, right next to his IRREFUTABLE proof of Russian collusion that he claimed to be in possession of.

 

[sjmay]

Let me ask you a question. What did Manafort's tax issues have to do with Russian collusion in the 2016 election? Was that a legitimate place for Mueller to go in his investigation? If it was then why wouldn't an investigation into possibly illegal lobbying influence stemming from an investigation into Ukranian actions related to the 2016 election also be a legitimate place for Barr to go in his investigation?

Here's another question, in all of the testimony from Schiff's investigation that's been released to the public so far is there ANY link to the Trump reelection campaign? At this point the ONLY thing that is tying the Trump/Zelensky phone call to 2020 is Schiff's interpretation of what was said.

As far as the transcript of the phone call goes, every single person that was on that call has testified that the transcript is accurate. Calling it a "memo" because you want something to be there that isn't there does not make not less than a transcript.

Dude, why do you waste your time with her? She's a time waste, she can't think for herself, and will claim liar over anything.

She will always fail to see the correlation between Mueller's investigation into Manafort as a branch of his investigation, and a possible Biden investigation as a branch of Barr's, she's not able to put 2 and 2 together....

 

[TomFitz]

Do they have a pee-pee tape?

No, I think Putin is saving that for the coup de grace!

 

[TomFitz]

Parnassus isn't the best witness, it he appears to be a professional hood and they often actually have insurance policies.

Trump only accepts illegal campaign contributions from the best people.

And he carefully vets all his hoods and bag men!

 

[digitusmedius]

Do they have a pee-pee tape?

Maybe. Is that all you're interested in?

 

[digitusmedius]

Parnassus isn't the best witness, it he appears to be a professional hood and they often actually have insurance policies.

Giuliani is letting President ****bag know he's got one and I'm not even sure he rises to the level of "professional" in the hoodlum world. He's pretty damn bad at hiding it.

 

[digitusmedius]

Word I'm getting from highly placed, highly credible and impeccably qualified, albeit anonymous, sources is that the videos will show Parnas, Giuliani and Fruman peeing on a hotel bed in Moscow which Barack Obama once slept in. In the corresponding audio transcripts they discuss how they will blame the pee on Russian hookers and then leaking the information to certain UK investigators. While there is no direct ti to Trump in any of this the careful listener will hear references to "The Don" and "The Orange Comet" which might, perhaps, be references to Trump. The evidence in these tapes, according to sources, is sufficient to warrant the appointment of a special prosecutor and could be thoroughly only if Trump's tax returns are released to the public.

Whose asshole are you getting all this from?

 

[digitusmedius]

I love these stories. They're always a big headline followed by lots of speculation and very little substance.

You must be reading your own comments over and over and over. Really fascinated by this pee-pee story, too. Care to elaborate why that seems to be a the top of your list?

 

[digitusmedius]

Well, with Watergate you at least had a break in. At this point all Schiff has is a bunch of bureaucrats who got their noses out of joint and his own theory about Trump's intent. He has presented NOTHING that ties the Biden investigation to the 2020 campaign and, in fact, he asked Zelensky to coordinate with Barr's investigation into 2016.

Look, it's pretty much a given that Schiff is going to put articles of impeachment on Nadler's desk. What happens from there is anybody's guess but it will be something to see if the House votes to impeach with no Republican support whatsoever. That will DEFINITELY be entertaining.

All this means is that the Trumper Criminal Cult is so much better at repelling facts and truth than the Nixon one was.

 

[digitusmedius]

If he gave it Congress, it means there's no evidence of a crime.

You don't seriously believes that SDNY has all of this and plenty more, do you? No wonder you people get so angry every time another shoe drops when you put so much effort into all that denial to see it get smashed apart with every new criminal fact that comes to light.

 

[digitusmedius]

Yeah, it was 18 months. They been going after Trump for over three years.

July 25, 2019 was just 4 months ago. That's the date which established the crime which is the basis of this impeachment process, nothing else. I again point out that the lies the Trump Cult tells us are trifling compared to those they tell themselves. This is a cardinal feature of all cults.

 

[digitusmedius]

Its only a big headline when it portrays republicans negatively when its a prominent democrat like jeffery Epstein then every precaution is used to protect journalistic integrity and standards.

Who exactly do they they think they are fooling?

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

So, I guess since your Dear ****bag claimed he was good friends with Epstein it was when he was a Democrat at the time? I realize the personality cult you belong to requires complete and total submission to its "Chosen One" at the expense of whatever dignity and self-respect I wonder when that will take its toll on the cultists....maybe it already has when I read utter crap like you write.