- Joined
- Jul 6, 2017
- Messages
- 122,485
- Reaction score
- 19,848
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Was my question invisible? You seem afraid to answer itThe real question is what evidence do you have that gun control will work?
Was my question invisible? You seem afraid to answer itThe real question is what evidence do you have that gun control will work?
Was my question invisible? You seem afraid to answer it
I think he believes that the NICS is not really deleted. Its some kind of conspiracy. Which is ridiculous
No because they have been proven to work. What evidence do you have that gun control will work?
Oh really? Yes the government never lies to the people... Back in the 1950's the CIA didn't secretly dose individuals with LSD in order to test the potential effects of mind control. Then again during the 1960s, the CIA "allegedly" funneled millions of dollars to the Tibetan Resistance, including what some claim was a six-figure annual “salary” that went directly to the Dalai Lama himself (which he denied). Oh wait? That turned out to be true. I am not even going into the The Gulf of Tonkin Incident. Almost forgot the Tuskegee experiments on Black Gi's.
So you keep living in utopia where the government can do no wrong.
But you said 30,000 die?
They work in limiting it to 30,000, however there is no gun control measure that will lower gun deaths other than a complete or near complete ban. Not only that but traffic laws regulate behavior. Gun laws regulate tools.
And what about that faked moon landing? Lol
Nice straw man. My statement must have gone over your head. Nothing new here.
So why bring it up. States with lax gun laws have the most per capita gun deaths. You are making my case
The reason why I brought it up is despite the regulations we still have 30,000 and my point is that gun deaths will remain the same. Also you're including suicides which is dishonest in the counting. Do we include rope suicides in rope deaths?
And elvis is still alive. Lol
So you are saying these events were not conspiracies at one time and then proved to be true?
Back in the 1950's the CIA didn't secretly dose individuals with LSD in order to test the potential effects of mind control.
During the 1960s, the CIA "allegedly" funneled millions of dollars to the Tibetan Resistance, including what some claim was a six-figure annual “salary” that went directly to the Dalai Lama himself (which he denied). That turned out to be true as well.
The Gulf of Tonkin Incident.
The Tuskegee experiments on Black Gi's.
Or are you just going to keep spouting conspiracies that have nothing to do with anything I said?
Here is some basic logic. Proof that one conspiracy existed is not proof all conspiracies exist. You have a claim of a conspiracy with no evidence
That is not my claim. My claim is simply that my opinion backed up by the fact I was involved with the government and had a security clearance. YOU brought up conspiracy theories (another straw man) I was simply pointing out the government will and does lie to us.
Then again I expect nothing less.
You're very welcome
Do you understand the environmental damage that has been created by the Brady Bill? The trees that had to die to make all that paper? All for nothing.
Come back when you have something to offer
In 1999 alone, 4,397 trees had to die to make the paper for background checks.
Dude I had a top secret clearance too. You have as much evidence as evidence aliens are being held at area 51. It's easily dismissed
It's not dismissed that is my point. It is my opinion, you can most certainly dismiss it. It in no way makes it any less plausible. Also considering the amount of times you have been caught in un un-truths, I don't believe a thing you say.
It is an opinion without any evidence and easily dismissed
I posted plenty of examples of the government lying. I guess you missed that part? Not surprising.
I agree the government lies. Are they lying about the aliens at Area 51? Lol
I don't know as it's irrelevant to anything I have said. Simple minded posts seems to be your forte.