• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

House Democrats say "you federal judges all suck, we erased all of you."

Democrats have no respect for the rule of law or norms. They are a disgrace.

Yes, perhaps you conveniently forgot Trump's serial encounters with the law; stealing money from a veteran's charity his own 'foundation' set up, for self-promotion ("a shocking pattern of illegality" said the judge), and defrauding hundreds of trusting folk with a 'fake' university scam. Trump lost $30 million in fines and restitutions over those, but Democrats have no respect for the law? Laughable.
Trump respects nothing but money. Maybe that's why he has no friends; just people he hasn't ****ed-over yet?
 
Last edited:
Isn't that what the House Democrats and the prosecutors say? The reason they did not issue subpoenas for the impeachment is because the federal courts are just too damn slow. So they erased Marbury v. Madison, deciding the Congress can outright erase the entire federal court system.

In fact, the entire core of "Abuse of Congress" is one huge FU! at the federal judicial system - so the Democrats in the House voted not only to entirely erase the Federal Courts from this process, but even that the President's team wanting to use the federal courts to decide a dispute between the White House and Congress - as has been done hundreds of times before - is SO EVIL just for TRYING to have the Federal Courts litigate the dispute over Executive Privilege that it is grounds from removal.

Why doesn't Schiff just shoot Chief Justice John Roberts the finger, telling him "you and all you other goddamn lazy federal judges are so damn slow you all have been fired and are irrelevant to anything - so get the hell out of here! We, the Democrats in the House of Representatives, overruled and reversed Marbury v. Madison."


The Democratic prosecutors are trying to kill two birds with one stone, believing they can totally take over the government. They erased the Federal judicial system - and are demanding Trump be removed for merely even trying to follow the process thru the Federal Court ever since Marbury v. Madison in the late 1700s. Thus, in one move the Democrats in Congress believe they can outright erase the Judicial branch of government, while turning the President into their subordinate employee in at-will employment they can terminate at any time.

If Chief Justice Roberts allows this? He's a pure coward and EVERYONE should be able to completely ignore Federal Courts on the same principle: "I need to do this fast and the Federal Courts are too damn slow, so therefore they are irrelevant."

They should particularly do this for death penalty cases. To hell with Federal Court appeals. They're just too damn slow. So we, of the Oklahoma legislature say ignore all those federal court papers. Execute him in the morning. It's already been too slow, almost a month since he was sentenced to death.

Same principle. Unless the Federal judiciary can hear a matter fast enough to suit both parties, the Federal judicial system is irrelevant and can just be ignored. So can the Constitution, any laws and regulations, the Bill Of Rights, Rules of Evidence and Rules of Court if they are too bothersome or prevent you from doing what you want to do.

So you made up the quote, how dishonest.
 
Thats an odd way for you to spin this.
Roberts took it upon himself to deny a legal question from being asked by a senator at an impeachment trial without even so much as offering a legal explination of why. He litterally blocked testimony and hindered the senate from making an informed verdict.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Guess Rand needs to appeal.
 
Isn't that what the House Democrats and the prosecutors say? The reason they did not issue subpoenas for the impeachment is because the federal courts are just too damn slow. So they erased Marbury v. Madison, deciding the Congress can outright erase the entire federal court system.

In fact, the entire core of "Abuse of Congress" is one huge FU! at the federal judicial system - so the Democrats in the House voted not only to entirely erase the Federal Courts from this process, but even that the President's team wanting to use the federal courts to decide a dispute between the White House and Congress - as has been done hundreds of times before - is SO EVIL just for TRYING to have the Federal Courts litigate the dispute over Executive Privilege that it is grounds from removal.

Why doesn't Schiff just shoot Chief Justice John Roberts the finger, telling him "you and all you other goddamn lazy federal judges are so damn slow you all have been fired and are irrelevant to anything - so get the hell out of here! We, the Democrats in the House of Representatives, overruled and reversed Marbury v. Madison."


The Democratic prosecutors are trying to kill two birds with one stone, believing they can totally take over the government. They erased the Federal judicial system - and are demanding Trump be removed for merely even trying to follow the process thru the Federal Court ever since Marbury v. Madison in the late 1700s. Thus, in one move the Democrats in Congress believe they can outright erase the Judicial branch of government, while turning the President into their subordinate employee in at-will employment they can terminate at any time.

If Chief Justice Roberts allows this? He's a pure coward and EVERYONE should be able to completely ignore Federal Courts on the same principle: "I need to do this fast and the Federal Courts are too damn slow, so therefore they are irrelevant."

They should particularly do this for death penalty cases. To hell with Federal Court appeals. They're just too damn slow. So we, of the Oklahoma legislature say ignore all those federal court papers. Execute him in the morning. It's already been too slow, almost a month since he was sentenced to death.

Same principle. Unless the Federal judiciary can hear a matter fast enough to suit both parties, the Federal judicial system is irrelevant and can just be ignored. So can the Constitution, any laws and regulations, the Bill Of Rights, Rules of Evidence and Rules of Court if they are too bothersome or prevent you from doing what you want to do.




During Mueller, repubs whined and whined it was taking too long.


During hearings, repubs whine that it's not long enough.

Make up your ****ing minds.


No dem calls federal judges "lazy". But, given that 2020 elections are on the horizon, there simply is not enough time to challenge every subpoena Trump defies.


Hell, dems wouldn't even need the courts if Trump wasn't going defy every subpoena and obstruct.

Repubs cause the problem they are complaining about.
 
Democrats have no respect for the rule of law or norms. They are a disgrace.

Yes, nothing spells "respect for rule of law" than a president defying, for the first time history, ALL congressional subpoenas.


Ever heard of the word, "hypocrite"? You might want to meditate on it's meaning.
 
They should of used Gorsuch as a huge middle finger to the Democrats.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Kavanaugh would've been giving them the middle finger.
 
Back
Top Bottom