Jek4141
Active member
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2018
- Messages
- 361
- Reaction score
- 38
- Location
- On the Internet
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Because if it's a day it's been proven wrong.
Please clarify? I'm confused. What do you mean?
Because if it's a day it's been proven wrong.
Let's start with the measure of our day, the sun, having not been created till the third day. Di you think that the time scale was changed once that happened?
Fine. This was interesting. Know I'll be praying for you.
Please clarify? I'm confused. What do you mean?
The Hebrew word yom in the original transcription of the book translates strictly into a 24-hour day. I just used my brain.
Also, cite for me historical or scientific fact that the world is more than 6000-7000 years old
Why should God adhere to the sun's timetable? Wouldn't the reverse be true, that the sun would move at the rate that God predesigned for it?
That's why He wrote it down. In a book. Called the Bible. Been around since Gutenberg, and it was an instant bestseller. I highly recommend it
The Hebrew word yom in the original transcription of the book translates strictly into a 24-hour day. I just used my brain.
Also, cite for me historical or scientific fact that the world is more than 6000-7000 years old
Fine. This was interesting. Know I'll be praying for you.
Any fossil
No one "predesigned" the sun or put it in motion. Solar formation and motion is one of the most understood concepts in the cosmos. The same can be said for their deaths.
Last I recall it was people who wrote it as an "interpretation" of what a deity supposedly said or didn't. You can choose to accept what interpretation of divinity is palatable to you, it's all second hand information. I accept that it's your choice to believe in which ever faith system you like, but it's not the only one out there.
Radiometric dating. Astrophysics.. The fact that the aborigines in Australia have a culture that is 40,000 years old
Radiometric dating is faulty because it relies on human assumption.
How do you know that the aborigines have a 40000 year old culture? did they record it? did scientists carbon date it?
How so??
The flood was 10000 years ago!Any fossils are younger than or equal in age to the flood
How can we prove that the half-life of Carbon 14 is what we assume it is? How could the flood have played a factor in modern scientists' perspectives of modern carbon dating?
https://answersingenesis.org/geology/carbon-14/doesnt-carbon-14-dating-disprove-the-bible/
Here's a good link.
Radiometric dating is faulty because it relies on human assumption.
How do you know that the aborigines have a 40000 year old culture? did they record it? did scientists carbon date it?
The flood was 10000 years ago!
No, actually not. You know that the extreme limits of carbon 14 dating is 50,000 years. they used thermo-luminescence ,and DNA diversification.
Pretend I'm stupid and please talk down to me, or at least explain your big words?
And the concept is the product of the mind of God. You have no point other than claiming that God does not exist
And the concept is the product of the mind of God. You have no point other than claiming that God does not exist
Why should God adhere to the sun's timetable? Wouldn't the reverse be true, that the sun would move at the rate that God predesigned for it?