Hillary is running again for president in 2020.

[Bullseye]

Hillary Clinton: I Will Not Run For President Again

And since she's the most truthful person in American politics I guess that's that. :roll:

 

[beerftw]

Are democrats going to be stupid enough to nominate her again?

I doubt she will run again, she ran one of if not the worst campaign in history, so bad that she lost to the worst candidate in history( well I guess it makes him second worst since he won)

 

[chuckiechan]

Are democrats going to be stupid enough to nominate her again?

She is misreading the trade tactics being used by China. They are tailoring their tarrifs to punish Trump voters and leave Hillary voters alone. Talk about trying to influence our elections!

Either way, this could backfire on the democrats if they are being seen to side with China in trying to increase their power at the expense of American economic policy.

 

[Exquisitor]

I doubt she will run again, she ran one of if not the worst campaign in history, so bad that she lost to the worst candidate in history( well I guess it makes him second worst since he won)

Hillary, if I wasn't propping her up she would have been nowhere, Trump would have ran all over her.

As it was Pence dominated the election as I underestimated him or I would have told the Resonant Mind the same thing I always do, "now we can't go with these Christians because they're not connected to reality."

I told the mind, "See these Republicans, what they've done, I don't want any light going to any of them except a little bit to this Trump."

The mind agreed with me.

They would of all passed the same tax cut.

 

[Hawkeye10]

The conventional wisdom is that Clinton Corp is keeping as much of a hand in the game as they can manage to protect the most of their "legacy" or "work" or as I am sure they put it "Good deeds towards a better American Tomorrow" as they can for as long as they can.

I see no great evidence that disputes this.

 

[Excon]

And since she's the most truthful person in American politics I guess that's that. :roll:

Did I say that?
Or did I just provide valid information that contradicts the OP?

 

[Bullseye]

Did I say that?
Or did I just provide valid information that contradicts the OP?

And I was pointing out that that "valid information" came from a source not known for its honesty.

 

[ModerationNow!]

I doubt she'd run again.
And even if she did, the Democrats are not THAT stupid to let her.

Remember, Hillary and her cohort Debbie Wasserman Schwartz corrupted the DNC to the point where it existed ONLY to work to get Hillary elected, while working AGAINST all other Democratic party candidates. Once again, it was permitted to happen with the complicity of the American news media, who didnt expose the corruption! There was very little reporting on that insanely UN-democratic conspiracy, and that didn't even happen til after the election was over!

On one hand I doubt she'll run again, but it'll be REALLY hard for someone as power hungry as her to just walk away... Besides, I don't think the Democratic party would be able to stop her. Who else wields more power and influence on the DNC than the Clintons?

 

[cuban smokes]

if HRC runs again I hope like Hell it's just a really, really, really, really bad case of diarrhea ..............

 

[ModerationNow!]

And since she's the most truthful person in American politics I guess that's that. :roll:

Hey, if she said she WILL NOT run for president again, then you and I should automatically take that as a 100% fact. That's what the news media does. When republicans make statements, the media will always portray the statements as "well, republicans say blah blah blah, but". When democrats make statements, the anchors will normally just air the statement on its own, with no preface, or portrayal of the statements as anything other than conclusive facts.

When it turns out that the statements were partially or fully inaccurate or untruthful, the media will rarely ever expose the lies or inconsistencies. They are supposed to air the original statement and contrast it with the truth, but I can conservatively state that, when it comes to false statements made by democrats(or progressive elites), they fail to do that at least 80%-90% of the time(bias by omission)!

 

[Dittohead not!]

And since she's the most truthful person in American politics I guess that's that. :roll:

Far more truthful than the winner of the election. Maybe that's why she lost: She wasn't a good enough liar.

The only people who want to see Hillary Clinton running for president again are the Republicans.

 

[Moderate Right]

Are democrats going to be stupid enough to nominate her again?

Hillary couldn't even win by cheating. And, she's a two time loser.

 

[Objective Voice]

https://nypost.com/2018/07/07/is-hillary-clinton-secretly-planning-to-run-in-2020/

Nothing in the NYPost article suggests Hillary plans on running again in 2020. If anything, it shows she's using what little political clout that remains to fundraise for the DNC. But hey! If Mitt Romney could run for the Senate after his third failed bit for the White House, why can't Hillary dare to run for a third time as well if not for any other position in politics lower than POTUS?

 

[Objective Voice]

Hillary couldn't even win by cheating. And, she's a two time loser.

Mitt Romney is a 3-time loser and he's running for the Senate. What's your point?

 

[nota bene]

Nothing in the NYPost article suggests Hillary plans on running again in 2020. If anything, it shows she's using what little political clout that remains to fundraise for the DNC. But hey! If Mitt Romney could run for the Senate after his third failed bit for the White House, why can't Hillary dare to run for a third time as well if not for any other position in politics lower than POTUS?

She can run as many times as she pleases. :roll:

 

[Excon]

And I was pointing out that that "valid information" came from a source not known for its honesty.

So what you are really saying is that you made up a false claim in your OP and can not support it.
Got it.

 

[Objective Voice]

She can run as many times as she pleases. :roll:

That is correct. As long as she follows proper procedures in each state she can run for the presidency as often as she likes. Doesn't mean she'll win, but she certainly can run again...and again...and again.

Again, if Mitt can do it three times, why can't Hillary?

Sidenote: Before anyone says it, I seriously doubt I'd vote for her if she run for a third time. I didn't vote for her the last two times she ran, but I guess it would depend on who else was running.

 

[Grand Mal]

Are democrats going to be stupid enough to nominate her again?

Are Republicans stupid enough to actually hope for this? Could the GOP really think their nuts might be pulled out of the fire by the DNC?
No, no, ain't gonna happen. The best hope for the GOP in 2020 is to bypass the incumbent in their nomination.
Is that even possible in the US? Could the Republican Party nominate someone else besides the sitting President?

 

[Vox]

Are democrats going to be stupid enough to nominate her again?

She's all done.......she screwed the pooch.

She'll just get old and fat and rich now and die a sad and lonely death.

 

[Dittohead not!]

Are Republicans stupid enough to actually hope for this? Could the GOP really think their nuts might be pulled out of the fire by the DNC?
No, no, ain't gonna happen. The best hope for the GOP in 2020 is to bypass the incumbent in their nomination.
Is that even possible in the US? Could the Republican Party nominate someone else besides the sitting President?

They could, of course. It seems rather unlikely that they will, though. Has that ever happened in the past?

 

[PTF]

Are democrats going to be stupid enough to nominate her again?

They would be stupid to nominate any liberal/Demo.