• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hillary Innocence Project

woodsman said:
I didn't think there was anyone left that still believes the State Departments assertion that the Benghazi tragedy was triggered by a youtube video. I’m thinking that those same folks must think Tulsi Gabbard, a sitting congresswomen and war veteran is a Russian asset along with Jill Stein.

As for vindication of HRC in the email probe, yes she wasn’t one of the 38 people found culpable of sending classified documents to her private server but that doesn’t make her innocent by a long shot. In fact, HRC is the only person I’m aware of that could and did get away with destroying protected evidence via a subpoena from the Justice department, meaning, the destruction of computer hard drives , phones and tablets. This is one of don’t try this at home things unless you want to spend the next three decades in prison.

I suppose these same folks will see this as a vindication when it should be seen as more evidence that partisan blinders and pure hatred for the current administration distorts reality.
Click to expand...

The CIA made the video assertion and Hillary never once repeated it. There was no "protected evidence " destroyed. They were her personal emails. You have been fed a bunch of hooey and lapped it up like candy. That is on you. If you are worried about national security start with Trump handing over Syria to Russia and Iran. That is the biggest breech of national security in a generation.
 
Last edited:
I wonder what it's like to be a Trump sucker.
 
iguanaman said:
The CIA made the video assertion and Hillary never once repeated it. There was no "protected evidence " destroyed. They were her personal emails. You have been fed a bunch of hooey and lapped it up like candy. That is on you. If you are worried about national security start with Trump handing over Syria to Russia and Iran. That is the biggest breech of national security in a generation.
Click to expand...

Yep. Even when the thread clearly shows they've been duped. They insist the bull**** they ate was some holy grail of fact that only a wingnut could understand.
 
iguanaman said:
The CIA made the video assertion and Hillary never once repeated it. There was no "protected evidence " destroyed. They were her personal emails. You have been fed a bunch of hooey and lapped it up like candy. That is on you. If you are worried about national security start with Trump handing over Syria to Russia and Iran. That is the biggest breech of national security in a generation.
Click to expand...

nah...thats these folks

comey-clapper-and-brennan-2.jpg
 
ocean515 said:
Yes, you are quite correct. And the Washington Posts extreme bias also shines through.

The headline attempts to suggest Hillary remains unsullied, when in fact, what the State Department said is simply Hillary didn't mean to violate the rules and compromise national security, when she violated the rules and compromised national security.

Given all the heads that got smacked, and other events that occurred, seems her rein at the helm of the State Department was anything but stellar.

And she is the reason the left is tearing the country apart...
Click to expand...

And the Barr summary said "no collusion" when what mueller really said was they weren't sure they could prove that the trump tower crew knew that what they were doing was against the law.

So there's that.
 
ocean515 said:
If that is the case, I would think reporting them at that point would be unnecessary.

Hoping for the killing of non-believers of the liberal cause does seem a bit extreme though.
Click to expand...

He was talking about imaginary things.

Its not his fault y'all believe in imaginary things.
 
Trump said:
nah...thats these folks

comey-clapper-and-brennan-2.jpg
Click to expand...

You sure it is not these? 2 of the 4 have commited multiple felonies. Oh and the other 2 are Russian mobsters.

Fruman-Parnas-Trump-Rudy.png
 
Last edited:
GDViking said:
Trump is still calling world leaders on his personal phone rather than. A secure phone..

The hypocrisy from the right is unfathomable!!!
Click to expand...
Why do you think I would excuse misconduct by Pres. Trump?

Start a thread detailing how Pres. Trump is breaking the law or compromising national security with his personal phone use. Present your evidence. If I find it compelling and see where others are claiming Democrats are "duped" into believing the "crap" about Pres. Trump's phone use, or claiming that Pres. Trump is "innocent" because his actions don't rise to the level of criminality, you can watch me take them to task.

The title of this thread is "Hillary Innocence Project", i.e. Ms. Clinton is innocent because an inquest has (somehow) determined that her handling of e-mails didn't rise to the level of criminal behaviour. This is what I'm speaking against and what you should be speaking against.

Enough of these tu quoque defenses, especially when they're based on false presumptions.

What if...? said:
Like the trump tower crew.
Click to expand...
That's fair.

The Trump Tower meeting damaged Pres. Trump's reputation--as it should have. Set-up or no, to this day it persists as the backbone of the allegations of Russian collusion. It was a stupid thing for Mr. Trump Jr. and Pres. Trump's campaign men to do, whether criminal or not.

You won't see me creating "Trump Tower Crew Innocence Project" threads, I can assure you.
 
calamity said:
Unlike Trump, Hillary did not knowingly release classified information.
Click to expand...

It doesn't matter if she KNOWINGLY release it or not: "or otherwise makes available to an unauthorized person," notice how you went to she didn't break the law to saying Trump did it too. In that case the Democrats should have brought that up for impeachment. Which would mean they had a crime to investigate, to hold up to the public, but it would also have meant they would have to hold Hillary to the same standard.
 
rwee2000 said:
It doesn't matter if she KNOWINGLY release it or not: "or otherwise makes available to an unauthorized person," notice how you went to she didn't break the law to saying Trump did it too. In that case the Democrats should have brought that up for impeachment. Which would mean they had a crime to investigate, to hold up to the public, but it would also have meant they would have to hold Hillary to the same standard.
Click to expand...

It does matter, obviously.
 
calamity said:
It does matter, obviously.
Click to expand...

Then why did Kristian Saucier spend a year in jail? Remember the pictures he had were the LOWEST clearance level, on a phone he tossed out. He didn't INTEND for them to found.
 
State Department finds one of its own not guilty.

Sensible people?

Unsurprised.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom