• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Gun banning Groups

vegas giants said:
Oh please you are openly laughed at even by pro gunners. Lol
Click to expand...

you're lying. and even though every post you make on this board is subject to being liked, your ratio of likes to posts is one tenth. far lower than mine. and the vast majority of your posts are on the gun forum. so few posters have much respect for your posts. guess you lose again
 
TurtleDude said:
you're lying. and even though every post you make on this board is subject to being liked, your ratio of likes to posts is one tenth. far lower than mine. and the vast majority of your posts are on the gun forum. so few posters have much respect for your posts. guess you lose again
Click to expand...

Again this becomes about you and me because you have no argument. You have to go for the personal attack. Everyone can see thru it....and laughs at it
 
vegas giants said:
Again this becomes about you and me because you have no argument. You have to go for the personal attack. Everyone can see thru it....and laughs at it
Click to expand...

if your posts are so great and mine so bad, why the disparity? and its you attacking me personally with your claims, I am attacking your silly posts which are clearly not designed to further rational discussion
 
TurtleDude said:
if your posts are so great and mine so bad, why the disparity? and its you attacking me personally with your claims, I am attacking your silly posts which are clearly not designed to further rational discussion
Click to expand...

People see right thru you....and laugh. LOL
 
vegas giants said:
People see right thru you....and laugh. LOL
Click to expand...

why are you talking about me? how about trying to prove your anti gun claims with something more than

THEY WORK GREAT
 
TurtleDude said:
why are you talking about me? how about trying to prove your anti gun claims with something more than

THEY WORK GREAT
Click to expand...

Or that states with lax gun laws have the most gun deaths. LOL
 
Rucker61 said:
What was he suggesting that wasn't true?
Click to expand...

This legislation is not a gun ban.

Rucker61 said:
Has declaring those areas as gun free zones been successful in keeping those intent on homicide with a gun out of those areas?
Click to expand...

How can you claim to know how many accidents were prevented?
 
vegas giants said:
Or that states with lax gun laws have the most gun deaths. LOL
Click to expand...

why is vermont so low and Maryland so high" and why do you dishonestly count suicide which is not something that is relevant to a public safety inquiry?
 
TurtleDude said:
why is vermont so low and Maryland so high" and why do you dishonestly count suicide which is not something that is relevant to a public safety inquiry?
Click to expand...

Gun death inquiry. I fixed it for you. LOL
 
vegas giants said:
Gun death inquiry. I fixed it for you. LOL
Click to expand...

suicide is irrelevant given Japan, which completely bans handguns, has higher rates of suicide then the most pro gun states in the USA
 
Rucker61 said:
As assault weapons are guns, this is a ban on some guns. It's unacceptable.



The Assault Weapons Ban of 2013 bans types of rifles, handguns and shotguns. Did you not know this?
Click to expand...

You are misunderstanding: i am not claiming that this legislation does not ban any guns. What i'm claiming is that this legislation is an assault weapons ban. That is what it is. Exchanging non-equivalent terms changes that meaningfully.
 
Absentglare said:
You are misunderstanding: i am not claiming that this legislation does not ban any guns. What i'm claiming is that this legislation is an assault weapons ban. That is what it is. Exchanging non-equivalent terms changes that meaningfully.
Click to expand...

first of all what is an "assault weapon" different states have included 3000 dollar 5 shot olympic target pistols. (which is why the Olympic trials which were held in LA for several games had to be moved to Atlanta after California passed its idiotic laws) other states included the famous Winchester Model 12 (introduced before WW ONE) as an assault weapon.

its a complete lie since the term "assault" as used by the military requires select fire firearms and none of the guns the bannerrhoid movement wants to target have that capability.

Secondly, if you support banning guns owned in the 40 million number range, that makes you a GUN BANNER. trying to pretend that since you do not CURRENTLY call for bans on other guns, means you aren't a banner is a lie

BTW absentglare do you support banning any type of firearm?
 
TurtleDude said:
suicide is irrelevant given Japan, which completely bans handguns, has higher rates of suicide then the most pro gun states in the USA
Click to expand...

Is this Japan? This is the US
 
vegas giants said:
Is this Japan? This is the US
Click to expand...

well you constantly invoke Japan, England, Canada (IT WORKS GREAT) and Australia to support your desire for more laws designed to harass legal gun ownership in the USA so why such a silly question?
 
Absentglare said:
This legislation is not a gun ban.
Click to expand...

But it is a gun ban. Assault weapons are guns and it mentions the word "ban" right in the title. It does not have to ban all guns to be a gun ban.
How can you claim to know how many accidents were prevented?
Click to expand...

Pretty sure I did not mention accidents; I only addressed the efficacy of signs in stopping those with homicidal entering school grounds.
 
Absentglare said:
You are misunderstanding: i am not claiming that this legislation does not ban any guns. What i'm claiming is that this legislation is an assault weapons ban. That is what it is. Exchanging non-equivalent terms changes that meaningfully.
Click to expand...

Is an assault weapons ban a type of gun ban? If not, what would have to be included in the legislation to be considered a gun ban?
 
TurtleDude said:
well you constantly invoke Japan, England, Canada (IT WORKS GREAT) and Australia to support your desire for more laws designed to harass legal gun ownership in the USA so why such a silly question?
Click to expand...

Oh god....this is boring
 
vegas giants said:
Oh god....this is boring
Click to expand...

why not go back to where you came if you don't like it here. we were doing fine before we started getting inundated with crap like "IT WORKS GREAT" or

THANK YOU FOR YOUR OPINION Or "ITS A HUGE SUCCESS"

but I agree with you. Silly one liners repeated over and over are BORING
 
TurtleDude said:
why not go back to where you came if you don't like it here. we were doing fine before we started getting inundated with crap like "IT WORKS GREAT" or

THANK YOU FOR YOUR OPINION Or "ITS A HUGE SUCCESS"

but I agree with you. Silly one liners repeated over and over are BORING
Click to expand...

Again I admire your courage for surviving the rape and sodomy of your rights. You are a survivor sir.
 
vegas giants said:
Again I admire your courage for surviving the rape and sodomy of your rights. You are a survivor sir.
Click to expand...

why do you constantly lie about what other posters state?
 
vegas giants said:
We got it loud and clear. You would not care if every child in America was killed by gun violence as long as they are not your kids. We got it. You can stop shouting it now
Click to expand...

Yea. What’s wrong with putting my family before everyone else? Maybe if other people did that...there wouldn’t be so much violence? But hey. You keep letting your heart bleed so much for those poor people. I bet you honestly believe it is somehow noble to sacrifice your family’s safety for the “greater good.” Im glad my family loves me more than the “greater good.” How pathetic and weak.
 
blackjack50 said:
Yea. What’s wrong with putting my family before everyone else? Maybe if other people did that...there wouldn’t be so much violence? But hey. You keep letting your heart bleed so much for those poor people. I bet you honestly believe it is somehow noble to sacrifice your family’s safety for the “greater good.” Im glad my family loves me more than the “greater good.” How pathetic and weak.
Click to expand...
We got it. Filling out a form is too much for you. Got it. Crystal clear
 
blackjack50 said:
Yea. What’s wrong with putting my family before everyone else? Maybe if other people did that...there wouldn’t be so much violence? But hey. You keep letting your heart bleed so much for those poor people. I bet you honestly believe it is somehow noble to sacrifice your family’s safety for the “greater good.” Im glad my family loves me more than the “greater good.” How pathetic and weak.
Click to expand...

do you actually believe that is his motivation?
 
vegas giants said:
We got it. Filling out a form is too much for you. Got it. Crystal clear
Click to expand...

filling out forms leads to rat infestations. rats lead to bubonic plague, rabies, and typhoid. stamp out plagues, stamp out registration
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom