- Joined
- Oct 1, 2005
- Messages
- 38,750
- Reaction score
- 13,845
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Too bad the analogy is false.
Hardly. You advocate raising costs on the other companies in a bid to make GM competitive. You've said this at least half a dozen times.
All that does is cripple the other companies. It doesn't make GM better.
This is exactly what was done in a Harrison Bergeron classroom -- the better students were literally dumbed down so that they wouldn't perform better than the poorer students. THAT'S what you want to do.
According to your reasoning, Tanya Harding was made a more competitive skater because her boyfriend piped Nancy Kerrigan.