- Joined
- Feb 1, 2010
- Messages
- 88,778
- Reaction score
- 39,683
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
but but but...dont bring up stupid **** when it was your own guys fault..."But. but, but.....Clinton!"
but but but...dont bring up stupid **** when it was your own guys fault..."But. but, but.....Clinton!"
You must be ignoring the reality of FEMA and you must be ignoring the ACCEPTED responses of FEMA during the Clinton administration. 4 weeks to respond...acceptable. 3 days to respond...George Bush dont like black people.You must be kidding if you think Brown did a good job. He was in way over his head and had no busness as head of FEMA.
Interesting that you had no problem letting a derogatory term for blacks fly free but managed to keep the respect for the 'Mexicans'...
That makes me want to vote for him even more.
Don't think so. An affiliation is an official or formal connection.
I never understood this. Did this mean that only a number of years ago, those Democrats who identified with the New Deal and a large chunk (maybe not all) of the Great Society programs, and considered themselves liberals, were not liberals after all? To me, this is a disingenuous attempt to strike back at the exaggeration of conservatives regarding American liberalism. It's just as silly as watching conservatives dismiss the contributions of other conservatives from the past 40 years because now they think "they were not conservatives."
Did you read your own Wikipedia article? According to it, 9 of the 10 dismissed had (R)s by their names. Try again.
Did you read your own Wikipedia article? According to it, 9 of the 10 dismissed had (R)s by their names. Try again.
but but but...dont bring up stupid **** when it was your own guys fault...
i gave no implication of the the letter beside their name.
The only one getting fired is going to be Newt himself.
YOur post makes no sense. YOu are comparing a President firing APPOINTED Republican Offiicals with Newt's threat to fire Civil Service employees who are Democrats.
NOt the worst analogy of the year, but definitely a nominee.
no, there is a distinction to be madeseemed like a textbook case of a president firing those that disagreed with him and getting away with it.. pretty much what gingrich implied he would do.
JB thats ok except, if you were to do efficiency studies on what merit employees accomplish in a given day, I bet you could cut the workforce "to the bone" and still have adequate service. Same for administration and management. Id much rather prefer the higher ups get the axe than the rank and file, because lets face it, the heirarchal shape of government bureaucracy is nowhere near as efficient as people would like to believe. The more layers between the top and the bottom the more the system tends to break down. Thats why the red tape has become so insurmountable.
The prupose of government has become to create more and more government. Thats got to change. Governmental mindset needs to change with it or nothing will be accomplished if you DO cut it.
Did you read your own Wikipedia article? According to it, 9 of the 10 dismissed had (R)s by their names. Try again.
Those travel office employees better watch their backs.
Wasn't T. Jefferson the one that said that we need a revolution every 20 yrs? In his mind you not only threw out the tyrant but all of his ministers and bureaucracy went too.