:allhail
I believed we were speaking about his hands in general (like his bruised knuckles), but becasue I lacked specificity in my argument I will admit that my commentary was wrong.
I am not often wrong, but when I am, I admit it. I was wrong and you were correct on this specific of Zimmerman's DNA.
Here are relevant links.
Zimmerman's DNA being taken on the
Police station interrogation video
The Crime Lab analyst's
testimony
Evidence that I knew his DNA was tested. An
argument that was specific in regards to the DNA testing.
Again.
I was wrong and you were correct on this specific regarding testing for Zimmerman's DNA.
But if you think you gained any ground in regards to anything else you have said, you would be sorely mistaken. Sans the DNA commentary, you were wrong in several of your comments as pointed out in post #678.
Wrong that it was a police dispatcher.
Wrong that that was the extent of your errors
Wrong in saying Zimmerman was told to remain in his car
Wrong in saying he was told to get into his car
Wrong in saying he was told not to follow
Wrong in claiming he was playing super hero
Wrong in claiming stalking
etc...
With that said.
A presence of foreign DNA under the nails would indicate defense, there being none under Trayvon's nails would be consistent with him being the attacker.
The incident happened in the rain. After being shot, Trayvon lay face down on the wet grass until he was flipped over for resuscitation efforts, he was then covered after that effort failed. Later his cloths were put away in evidence bags while wet.
Lack of positive results for Zimmerman's DNA is basically as irrelevant as the lack of Trayvon's DNA on the gun is.
While there was mixed DNA that could not include/exclude either regardless of the reason, we have eyewitnesses that put Trayvon on top of Zimmerman, and all of Zimmerman's injuries that were seen moments after they were inflicted, not just by the neighbor who came out, but by the Officer who arrived moments after the shooting.
I have no idea what your stake in this issue is, insisting that Travon caused his own death, and that HE is the criminal. You must have your reasons, you spend enough time trying to dispute any other statements.
Thinking I have a stake in arguing the evidence of a case is absurd.
I'm not going to roll around in the mud with you. I am a conservative, pro 2nd Amendment, CCW holder who ADVOCATES for the right of every law abiding citizen to carry a gun for their personal protection.
Irrelevant.
George Zimmerman is loony bird FOOL and is NOT the high watermark of who should represent 2nd Amendment rights. He stands as the perfect example of what gun grabbers point to as why people should not be given CCWs.
Wrong on all counts. His actions that night were not just justified but prudent as well.
Zimmerman was a fool before he killed Martin and has demonstrated more idiotic behavior since. A lame brained loose cannon who was wrong about Martin, didn't want him to "get away",
Opinionated nonsense.
and when he got out of his car to find Martin he brought his gun to a potential conflict that he had no compelling need to do so.
Irrelevant nonsense. Regardless if he was armed or not, he was trying to keep the suspicious person under observation until the police arrived.
Everything else is Trayvon's doing.
Except for Zimmerman when he was attacked by Trayvon.
and the police were already on their way.
Because Zimmerman called them on a person acting suspiciously.
If Zimmerman is your hero, good for you.
:lamo
You seem to confuse zeal in arguing evidence and the legalities of the issues with thinking a person is a hero.
That is an indication of how
you think of things, not how someone else thinks of things.
