• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Generation Z is anti-gay marriage, trans "rights" - The Times study finds

Vision said:
This article was about Generation Z, those born after the year 2000 - not "millennials". The trend seems to show that Generation Z is more skeptical of the "LGBT narrative" than those previous.
Click to expand...

So they went from being anti-lgbt to skeptical of a "narrative."

I would say that there's a Chasm of difference between anti something and skeptical of the narrative.
 
RabidAlpaca said:
I was wondering when the right's token Uncle Tom was going to show up and defend the person calling you a disease, degenerate and a cult member.
Click to expand...
Are all "people who are gay" diseased? No.

But from everything what I can tell, pride rallies are fronts for diseased people who prey on children - here's a wonderful example of them exploiting underage children to promote their cause:

Is This Child Abuse? Gay Activists Use 10-Year-Old Boy in 'Drag' to Promote NYC Pride Event | CBN News

It's apparent that they attempt to target young children and coach them into "identifying" as gay or trans, maybesince they can't biologically reproduce on their own they have to resort to exploiting children for their own ends.

635711281948630902-Gays007.JPG


So yeah, I believe that unless the LGBT movement stops preying on children, then younger people who are social media savvy will give them a huge backlash - I don't care about "gay marriage" in regards to this.
 
Last edited:
Vision said:
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/teenagers-oppose-gay-marriage-and-shun-tattoos-f2rf0td0b

Younger teenagers sceptical about gay marriage and trans movement, study claims | CatholicHerald.co.uk

As a researcher who keeps up with the trends and social changes in the modern and post-modern world, this is rather interesting: support for the "LGBT" subculture and trans "rights" seems to be dying out among the youngest and most web-savvy generation, with opposition to "LGBT" likely to become the prevailing social norm in the near future.

I'm personally not sure it's worth society's time to "oppose" it, since the "LGBT" cult never amounted to much to begin with - having been more or less comprised of a minority of less educated and socially maladjusted Boomers and Millennials - who one would expect to find a low-rent Los Angeles trailer park or "Insane Clown Posse" concert than they would at library, health food store, or classical music venue to begin with.

I'd venture that it might be better for the more evolved members of society just to let the underclass and evolutionary ineffectuals voluntarily quarantine themselves, and let their myriad of diseases - and lack of any reproductive ability - run their evolutionary course if they choose to perpetuate it.

Given that their sexual problems and identity disorders are arguably less a "disease" and more just a symptom of the trashy and diseased lifestyles that such individuals are prone to as a whole, having coincidentally gone hand-in hand with obesity, chain smoking, and other degenerative lifestyle choices:

https://truthinitiative.org/news/why-are-smoking-rates-higher-lgbt-communities

Among older LGBT adults, 9 percent have HIV disease. Cancer is reported in 19 percent of older LGBT adults, including 16 percent of lesbians, 20 percent of bisexual women, 21 percent of gay men, 24 percent of bisexual men and 16 percent of transgender older adults.


Cardiovascular disease is significantly higher for bisexual men than for gay men, according to SAMHSA. Older transgender adults have higher rates of obesity, cardiovascular disease, asthma and diabetes than other adults, but significantly lower rates of cataracts, and hepatitis.
Click to expand...

"Younger teenagers?" LOL ................ I can tell you that most teens have their heads stuck squarely up their assholes so, I don't particularly care what teenagers 'think.'

I was a teen once & believe me, I know what I'm talking about :lol:
 
RabidAlpaca said:
Because the OP has very clearly called ALL LGBT diseased, degenerate cult members and you're pretend it's just the liberal political wing of the LGBT community he was attacking. I mean ****, I'm not going to tell you who to defend, I just think it's hilarious that's what you're going with.
Click to expand...
"LGBT" is a movement, not a "sexual preference".

So no, I was not saying anyone who has ever had "gay feelings" is degenerate - I was pointing that that the "LGBT movement" is full of degenerates and is likely a front for child predators.

So what do you have to say about the fact that in the 1990s, the LGBT movement supported NAMBLA until they faced public backlash for it?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Man/Boy_Love_Association#ILGA_controversy

In 1993, the International Lesbian and Gay Association (ILGA) achieved United Nations consultative status. NAMBLA's membership of ILGA drew heavy criticism and caused the suspension of ILGA
 
Vision said:
"LGBT" is a movement, not a "sexual preference".

So no, I was not saying anyone who has ever had "gay feelings" is degenerate - I was pointing that that the "LGBT movement" is full of degenerates and is likely a front for child predators.

So what do you have to say about the fact that in the 1990s, the LGBT movement supported NAMBLA?
Click to expand...

So the people who are saying "gays should have rights like everyone else" are degenerates, but the gays who don't think they should have rights are ok?

Vision said:
Are all "people who are gay" diseased? No.
But from everything what I can tell, pride rallies are fronts for diseased people who prey on children - here's a wonderful example of them exploiting underage children to promote their cause:
Is This Child Abuse? Gay Activists Use 10-Year-Old Boy in 'Drag' to Promote NYC Pride Event | CBN News
It's apparent that they attempt to target young children and coach them into "identifying" as gay or trans, maybesince they can't biologically reproduce on their own they have to resort to exploiting children for their own ends.
So yeah, I believe that unless the LGBT movement stops preying on children, then younger people who are social media savvy will give them a huge backlash - I don't care about "gay marriage" in regards to this.
Click to expand...

Reminds me of how Christians have to brainwash their children early for it to stick, and often then it still doesn't.
 
RabidAlpaca said:
So the people who are saying "gays should have rights like everyone else" are degenerates, but the gays who don't think they should have rights are ok?
Click to expand...
Well if they accepted NAMBLA as members, then they apparently think molesting children is a "right", so that says a lot about them.

If they want to cover up their previous involvement with NAMBLA and pedophilia activists like "Harry Hay" in the 1990s and before, then it's all well researchable online, so I don't think that younger internet savvy people are going to be as keen on "LGBT" rights as previous generations are.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Hay

Reminds me of how Christians have to brainwash their children early for it to stick, and often then it still doesn't.
Click to expand...
...stopped reading there
 
Vision said:
Well if they accepted NAMBLA as members, then they apparently think molesting children is a "right", so that says a lot about them.

If they want to cover up their previous involvement with NAMBLA and pedophilia activists like "Harry Hay" in the 1990s and before, then it's all well researchable online, so I don't think that younger internet savvy people are going to be as keen on "LGBT" rights as previous generations are.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Hay


...stopped reading there
Click to expand...

Good that you stopped reading there, it was the last sentence.

I'm not sure what you're on about with NAMBLA. The vast majority of the LGBT community has nothing to do with them. If you hate kiddie ****ers then maybe you should attack the kiddie ****ers and not the LGBT.

The Catholic church has had lots of priests **** little kids. I guess that means Christianity is a cult, right? I mean, they've invited pedophiles into their ranks and defended them.
 
Vision said:
No, that study is about "gay couples", not members of the "LGBT cult".

Not all "gay couples" are members of the NAMBLA-endorsing LGBT cult - at least not anymore than "all Muslims" are members of ISIS.

Most "gay people" do not identify with the LGBT cult or involve themselves with politics - the LGBT movement is just a cult that preys on the mentally ill and lowest-functioning members of society, and actively recruits them into the so-called "lifestyle" merely to serve its own ends.
Click to expand...

Take your homophobic nonsense elsewhere.
 

Why won't you address my post #16 ?
 
TheGoverness said:
But remember, he doesn't hate gay people. No, no, not at all.
Click to expand...

He seems to be all over the place with that, in one pay he says homosexuality is a social construct, in another he's referencing Kinsey suggesting that everybody is bisexual.

It's a strange thought process, I'm intrigued in where it originates.
 
TheGoverness said:
Take your homophobic nonsense elsewhere.
Click to expand...
The point I was making is, if the "LGBT movement" is about rights, then why didn't they take out individuals such as "Harry Hay" who wanted NAMBLA to be admitted to the movement?

It seems like that the movement serves as a front for pro-pedophilia groups and is tacitly sympathetic to, and they can't just "sweep it under the rug" now that people (including younger audiences who may influence the future) who are internet savvy can read up on its history:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Hay

Hay joined several other early gay rights activists in protesting the exclusion of the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) from participation in LGBT social movements, most noticeably pride parades on the grounds that such exclusions pandered to heterosexual-dominated society.
 
Vision said:
This article was about Generation Z, those born after the year 2000 - not "millennials". The trend seems to show that Generation Z is more skeptical of the "LGBT narrative" than those previous.
Click to expand...

They are only 18 years old at the most. Many have yet to experience life outside their parents homes.
 
Vision said:
The point I was making is, if the "LGBT movement" is about rights, then why didn't they take out individuals such as "Harry Hay" who wanted NAMBLA to be admitted to the movement?

It seems like that the movement serves as a front for pro-pedophilia groups, and they can't just "sweep it under the rug
Click to expand...

It doesn't really seem that way.

It really seems that they have severed ties with such things. It seems odd you harp on something that was resolved 24 years ago.

Yes it's political wing was dedicated to equal treatment of so called "sexual minorities."
 
CLAX1911 said:
It doesn't really seem that way.

It really seems that they have severed ties with such things. It seems odd you harp on something that was resolved 24 years ago.

Yes it's political wing was dedicated to equal treatment of so called "sexual minorities."
Click to expand...

It's not that odd. These types want to smear gay people as pedophiles, so the reaching to try to make some connection there is intentional.
 
Vision said:
This article was about Generation Z, those born after the year 2000 - not "millennials". The trend seems to show that Generation Z is more skeptical of the "LGBT narrative" than those previous.
Click to expand...

The chart says "or later," which includes Gen Z.
 
TheGoverness said:
It's not that odd. These types want to smear gay people as pedophiles, so the reaching to try to make some connection there is intentional.
Click to expand...

it's odd in that he is just all over the place with some conflicting views. I really am intrigued. Like talking to someone that thinks the earth is flat. Does he really think these things or is he just saying weird stuff because it casts lgbt in a negative light.

If the latter the motivation intrigues me.
 
Vision said:
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/teenagers-oppose-gay-marriage-and-shun-tattoos-f2rf0td0b

Younger teenagers sceptical about gay marriage and trans movement, study claims | CatholicHerald.co.uk

As a researcher who keeps up with the trends and social changes in the modern and post-modern world, this is rather interesting: support for the "LGBT" subculture and trans "rights" seems to be dying out among the youngest and most web-savvy generation, with opposition to "LGBT" likely to become the prevailing social norm in the near future.

I'm personally not sure it's worth society's time to "oppose" it, since the "LGBT" cult never amounted to much to begin with - having been more or less comprised of a minority of less educated and socially maladjusted Boomers and Millennials - who one would expect to find a low-rent Los Angeles trailer park or "Insane Clown Posse" concert than they would at library, health food store, or classical music venue to begin with.

I'd venture that it might be better for the more evolved members of society just to let the underclass and evolutionary ineffectuals voluntarily quarantine themselves, and let their myriad of diseases - and lack of any reproductive ability - run their evolutionary course if they choose to perpetuate it.

Given that their sexual problems and identity disorders are arguably less a "disease" and more just a symptom of the trashy and diseased lifestyles that such individuals are prone to as a whole, having coincidentally gone hand-in hand with obesity, chain smoking, and other degenerative lifestyle choices:

https://truthinitiative.org/news/why-are-smoking-rates-higher-lgbt-communities

Among older LGBT adults, 9 percent have HIV disease. Cancer is reported in 19 percent of older LGBT adults, including 16 percent of lesbians, 20 percent of bisexual women, 21 percent of gay men, 24 percent of bisexual men and 16 percent of transgender older adults.


Cardiovascular disease is significantly higher for bisexual men than for gay men, according to SAMHSA. Older transgender adults have higher rates of obesity, cardiovascular disease, asthma and diabetes than other adults, but significantly lower rates of cataracts, and hepatitis.
Click to expand...

You sure do worry about being gay a lot
 
gulfman said:
I'm sure these teens feel like this in Catholic schools but in the brain washed liberal public school system the gay life style is heavily promoted.
Click to expand...

What exactly is this "gay lifestyle" homophobes seem to talk about so much?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom