*gasp* Obama portrait includes SECRET SPERM!

[Praxas]

Y’all do realize that perception is reality and from now into forever there will be talk of whether or not there’s a gigantic sperm on Obama’s face.

Of course the loonies will talk about it, but that doesn't make it any less idiotic.

 

[Zyphlin]

Secret sperm?

It also has a secret Homer

 

[X Factor]

It also has a secret Homer

So much win.

 

[Paperview]

Now Limbaugh has picked up the spermatozoa story.

It's official. Cons have lost their ever loving minds.

 

[tres borrachos]

He's a raving mad lunatic.

He was also posting today (linked earlier in the thread, if he hasn't pulled that, too) about lizards who are used for spying.

Lizards used for spying? That explains why that green thing was hopping around in my microwave I guess.

 

[Paperview]

Wonkette cracks me up:



"DOES THIS MEAN BARACK OBAMA IS GOING TO KILL WHITEY BY SPERMING THROUGH HIS BIG EARS AND MAKING ALL THE WHITE LADIES PREGNANT WITH O-BABIES?"

Con-spear-O-see theories about Obama's sperm are a thing now/

lol

 

[PleasantValley]

I see. It was soooooo prevalent that you can't back it up. This makes total sense.

I also do not care to post a link about the Kennedy assassination either, but that does not mean it did not happen.
Are internet links posted by tired and busy strangers at zero dark thirty the only way you get your news?
Certain things about this site are starting to make sense now.

NO LINK = It did not happen. An interesting concept.
It happened. Do a search yourself. I already know it did.
After Trump's election there were riots and burning in some major cities by the left.
Posting links does not make it go away.

Besides, I have seen this logic used many times before on here.
Someone proves it by posting a link, and then the link itself gets disavowed because they do not like its content.

I already PROVED beyond any doubt to one idiot here (not you) the term "neanderthal" was used way back in 1976 in a Dirty Harry movie.
Not necessarily invented then, but it was definitely used back then.
Even posted a link of the segment proving them using it.
They insisted that term was originally coined in 2012 after the Mitt Romney campaign.
They never would or did admit they were 100% wrong. Just kept re-posting their completely wrong claim.

I have better things to do with my time than to attempt to prove to someone on the internet any known facts they deny.
They will just keep denying the facts till the cows come home.
No one, except a rare few will ever admit they are wrong about anything they say on the internet.
No matter how many links or proof is put before them.

Look it up yourself, if you want to know.
I already do, and saw the reports with my own eyes.

 

[yankintx]

Ok, I have no idea if it’s true that the artist regularly paints sperm into his paintings but even if it is, and even if he did that here, that’s not Obama’s fault and if Obama is all good with something that looks vaguely like a giant sperm on his temple, I don’t see why anyone else shouldn’t be.

Sperm on Obamas portrait, sounds like a counter diversion to Russian hookers urinating on Obamas pic in some Russian hotel room. And a piss poor one at that !!:lamo

 

[poweRob]

I also do not care to post a link about the Kennedy assassination either, but that does not mean it did not happen.
Are internet links posted by tired and busy strangers at zero dark thirty the only way you get your news?
Certain things about this site are starting to make sense now.

NO LINK = It did not happen. An interesting concept.
It happened. Do a search yourself. I already know it did.
After Trump's election there were riots and burning in some major cities by the left.
Posting links does not make it go away.

Besides, I have seen this logic used many times before on here.
Someone proves it by posting a link, and then the link itself gets disavowed because they do not like its content.

I already PROVED beyond any doubt to one idiot here (not you) the term "neanderthal" was used way back in 1976 in a Dirty Harry movie.
Not necessarily invented then, but it was definitely used back then.
Even posted a link of the segment proving them using it.
They insisted that term was originally coined in 2012 after the Mitt Romney campaign.
They never would or did admit they were 100% wrong. Just kept re-posting their completely wrong claim.

I have better things to do with my time than to attempt to prove to someone on the internet any known facts they deny.
They will just keep denying the facts till the cows come home.
No one, except a rare few will ever admit they are wrong about anything they say on the internet.
No matter how many links or proof is put before them.

Look it up yourself, if you want to know.
I already do, and saw the reports with my own eyes.

1) I'm not waisting my time digging up your homework because you are too lazy to.
2) Even if I did, I can't prove a negative and I definitely can't prove crap you just make up on line to impress your stromfront buddies.
3) What does the term Neanderthal or Dirty Harry have to do with any of this?

 

[PleasantValley]

1) I'm not waisting my time digging up your homework because you are too lazy to.
2) Even if I did, I can't prove a negative and I definitely can't prove crap you just make up on line to impress your stromfront buddies.
3) What does the term Neanderthal or Dirty Harry have to do with any of this?

WHOOOSH!....
What's that? The sound of my point flying right over your head.

I don't need to prove what I already know as a fact.

ME: It rained this morning.....
YOU: No it did not, show me a link!
ME: My truck is a little low on gas.
YOU: No it is not! Show me a link!
ME: Kitty brought in a "gift" for me a few days ago and i am still finding random tufts of feathers in the carpet.
YOU: No it did not! Show me a link!

ME: There was random rioting and burning the day after trump got elected.
YOU: Not it did not! Show me a link!

ME: You poor soul.

Fortunately, the systems has checks and balances for your type so i never have to hear another stupid thing you post for the rest of my life.
Bye.

 

[poweRob]

WHOOOSH!....
What's that? The sound of my point flying right over your head.

I don't need to prove what I already know as a fact.

ME: It rained this morning.....
YOU: No it did not, show me a link!
ME: My truck is a little low on gas.
YOU: No it is not! Show me a link!
ME: Kitty brought in a "gift" for me a few days ago and i am still finding random tufts of feathers in the carpet.
YOU: No it did not! Show me a link!

ME: There was random rioting and burning the day after trump got elected.
YOU: Not it did not! Show me a link!

ME: You poor soul.

Fortunately, the systems has checks and balances for your type so i never have to hear another stupid thing you post for the rest of my life.
Bye.

Fact don't become facts just because you say so. And if it is fact, it should be rather easy for you to prove. That you don't back up your claims proves you don't live in a fact based world. So you run fast back into the bubble world you live in because your incredibly broken ideology won't be able survive this fact based world.

 

[PleasantValley]

1) I'm not waisting my time digging up your homework because you are too lazy to.
2) Even if I did, I can't prove a negative and I definitely can't prove crap you just make up on line to impress your stromfront buddies.
3) What does the term Neanderthal or Dirty Harry have to do with any of this?

So, now i am a racist, white supremacist Nazi because i will not do your bidding and your homework for you.
Yes, there are perfectly valid reasons the DP systems has certain features built into their system.
(tossing your bait back to you and waving bye, bye as you dissolve into the mist)

The eternal question: Why is it ALWAYS....ALWAYS...leftists that are the first to get personal, attack, throw racism and Nazis into an argument they are loosing? It is like their fallback plan.