- Joined
- Dec 19, 2008
- Messages
- 24,380
- Reaction score
- 7,805
- Location
- Worldwide
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
A deal's a deal and it's not a bad one. I just don't get how his supporters can convince themselves to avoid the truths so that they can praise Him for breathing. Some don't even bother defending him. They just whine about a former President and a former President wannabe. In the meantime, this is a guy who declared PTT horrible and the Iran deal the worst in history. Well his answer to both, in terms of a better deal, was to:
- swap a trillion from throughout the Pacific for a billion from Japan...
- and to walk away from the Iran deal so that he can implement no deal.
The Art of the Deal? The guy is an idiot who center's the best interests of our country around his pathetic and false ego. And he has convinced his constituents that he is all that they deserve.
You mean TPP?
In another post you said bringing up Obama was not relevant or some such nonsense.
Wrong.
It is 100% relevant, for what great agreements did Obama achieve?
If you like your Dr., you can keep your Dr.?
Iran?
Cuba?
All epic failures. As his track record is piss poor, who would put faith in Obama coming up with an agreement beneficial to the US over the long term?
Hillary Clinton Comes Out Against TPP | HuffPost
O’Malley was against it too. Sanders too.
“I was against the Trans-Pacific Partnership months and months ago,” he said. “I believe we need to stop stumbling backwards into bad trade deals.”
Sanders, speaking at the same conference, said he “will let the media speculate on” whether Clinton would have taken this stance if he weren’t in the race.
“...I can simply say I am delighted that Secretary Clinton is on board ... to be very frank with you, it would have been more helpful to have her on board a few months ago.”
Last edited: