Declan
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2014
- Messages
- 4,670
- Reaction score
- 1,926
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
I don't believe it, where did you get that idea from?
You. You said the others had a point.
I don't believe it, where did you get that idea from?
You are learning to play the clarinet. I know musicians that play well, and those that play rather poorly - but they all play. That's not the same thing as the either/or proposition you offer in the OP. Either God eliminates all disease and affliction, or He's not a loving God, but a vengeful and capricious one in your estimation. That conveniently eliminates man from any responsibility or effort to use the tools at his disposal, and the use of reason is chief among those tools.
:agree: By adhering to his teachings, such as those in the Ten Commandments as an example, we are being obedient. There is nothing harmful to us in those rules. We have the choice, much as a child does when he is told something by his parents or other authority figure. You don't have to obey, but there is punishment for not doing so. That is not being vengeful or capricious on the part of authority. . .it's a teaching tool, IMO. We were also given a brain to find cures for disease and other afflictions, and it's left for us to do so, since we do have free will. If we learn some day that there is life on other planets in the galaxy, it will be interesting to learn if the rules, and punishment for not obeying those rules, were universally applied to all creation in the universe.
Anybody can criticize. What are your comments concerning his main points, like bone cancer in children?
Yep. Humans require challenges in order to advance and flourish. Learning and the application of reason are a major part of the effort.
Yep. Humans require challenges in order to advance and flourish. Learning and the application of reason are a major part of the effort.
Here, give me your face. I'm going to bash it with a sledge hammer. Y'know, to give you a "challenge" so you can "advance and flourish". :roll:
What a steaming pile of horse****.
Here, give me your face. I'm going to bash it with a sledge hammer. Y'know, to give you a "challenge" so you can "advance and flourish". :roll:
What a steaming pile of horse****.
History says otherwise. And you look about in the same in horse**** as you would otherwise, I'm sure.
Surely you are kidding. A steaming pile of horse****? Humans DO need challenges. It's what makes us evolve. This is pretty elementary stuff here.
Come here, then. Let's make you flourish.
Christians tell us that god loves us all, I can only go by what they say.
Children born with horrible genetic diseases who know nothing but suffering before they die is not a challenge.
It's sadism.
Why would you believe there is any reason for "God" to have a preference regarding human suffering, or that God cares either way?
Or is it just your aim to ridicule and shame Christians?
If there is a God, it is my belief that it doesn't work with purpose, but rather just exists as a motivating and creative energy. What we do with that energy is what matters. The individual, with whatever problems he or she may have, is insignificant. I am insignificant, as are you. No God owes me anything whatsoever.
Any being that doesn't give two ****s about causing terrible suffering can go **** himself as far as I'm concerned. Such a being will get no worship from me.
Children born with horrible genetic diseases who know nothing but suffering before they die is not a challenge.
It's sadism.
You'd think a dude who could construct a star with his bear hands wouldn't be so offended by butt sex.
When did you start believing Christians?
Guess it's a good thing that your religious practices make no difference to me. Why would you think that God causes suffering?
Why would you think that God causes suffering?
So if we get rid of God then we get rid of everything that hurts us?
The man is a moron.
You are learning to play the clarinet. I know musicians that play well, and those that play rather poorly - but they all play. That's not the same thing as the either/or proposition you offer in the OP. Either God eliminates all disease and affliction, or He's not a loving God, but a vengeful and capricious one in your estimation. That conveniently eliminates man from any responsibility or effort to use the tools at his disposal, and the use of reason is chief among those tools.
:agree: By adhering to his teachings, such as those in the Ten Commandments as an example, we are being obedient. There is nothing harmful to us in those rules. We have the choice, much as a child does when he is told something by his parents or other authority figure. You don't have to obey, but there is punishment for not doing so. That is not being vengeful or capricious on the part of authority. . .it's a teaching tool, IMO. We were also given a brain to find cures for disease and other afflictions, and it's left for us to do so, since we do have free will. If we learn some day that there is life on other planets in the galaxy, it will be interesting to learn if the rules, and punishment for not obeying those rules, were universally applied to all creation in the universe.
It's almost certainly not fair to paint all atheists with this brush, but it is quite noticeable that the atheists who have most loudly spoken up in this thread, and Mr. Fry himself, are individuals who willfully and knowingly defend—or even engage in—immoral conduct, and seek to deny the wickedness of their conduct by trying to deny the authority that is most recognized as condemning this evil behavior. They hate any authority that will not condone their wickedness.