Friday Night Massacre

[code1211]

1 It did happen.
2. and anyone else who dared to investigate anything too close to the president.
3 Comey already was fired for conducting the investigation into Russian meddling in the election.
4 No, why?
5 Documented by which blog, Breitbart? The World Net Daily? Infowars?

1. There is an investigation and it has produced nothing that it was intended to produce. It goes on. why?

2. In point two, you mistake investigate for conspiring against. Strzok was so biased, even Muldoon was forced to dump him.

3. Comey was for a number of acts of idiocy and grandstanding.

4. It doesn't surprise me that you haven't wondered.

5. You obviously know nothing about this and yet you are absolutely sure you know it all. You must be a Democrat.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...3470754bbb9_story.html?utm_term=.2dcb7cb8ddd8
<snip>
The Clinton campaign and the DNC, through the law firm, continued to fund Fusion GPS’s research through the end of October 2016, days before Election Day.
<snip>

 

[Dittohead not!]

1. There is an investigation and it has produced nothing that it was intended to produce. It goes on. why?

2. In point two, you mistake investigate for conspiring against. Strzok was so biased, even Muldoon was forced to dump him.

3. Comey was for a number of acts of idiocy and grandstanding.

4. It doesn't surprise me that you haven't wondered.

5. You obviously know nothing about this and yet you are absolutely sure you know it all. You must be a Democrat.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...3470754bbb9_story.html?utm_term=.2dcb7cb8ddd8
<snip>
The Clinton campaign and the DNC, through the law firm, continued to fund Fusion GPS’s research through the end of October 2016, days before Election Day.
<snip>

1. My statement: "and the "partisan hack" who dared to pursue the Russia investigation had to be fired quickly before he could do more damage, even if he was about to retire anyway." That already happened. The Russia investigation produced proof positive that the Russians meddled in our election. Russia was sanctioned by Obama, then, after he could no longer deny plain facts, by Trump.

2. If investigating foreign interference with our election is conspiring against the president, then one must wonder just where the loyalties of the president really lie.

3, Comey was fired for pursuing the Russia investigation that Trump wanted to sweep under the carpet.

4. You obviously have a theory based on partisanship. Please, do enlighten us oh wise one.

5. Yep. That's it. I disagree with your partisan point of view, and therefore must be one of those Democrats.

 

[code1211]

1. My statement: "and the "partisan hack" who dared to pursue the Russia investigation had to be fired quickly before he could do more damage, even if he was about to retire anyway." That already happened. The Russia investigation produced proof positive that the Russians meddled in our election. Russia was sanctioned by Obama, then, after he could no longer deny plain facts, by Trump.

2. If investigating foreign interference with our election is conspiring against the president, then one must wonder just where the loyalties of the president really lie.

3, Comey was fired for pursuing the Russia investigation that Trump wanted to sweep under the carpet.

4. You obviously have a theory based on partisanship. Please, do enlighten us oh wise one.

5. Yep. That's it. I disagree with your partisan point of view, and therefore must be one of those Democrats.

What you seem to be entirely ignorant of is the plain and simple fact that the investigation being conducted by Muldoon and the Gang That Won't Shoot Straight is a partisan witch hunt.

Why is it that the Democrats involved in this whole mess are entirely and completely ignored by Muldoon and his henchmen?

The FBI's Office of Professional Responsibility and the Office of the Inspector General both recognize that something stinks in all of this among their ranks, but poor Muldoon couldn't find either this or his pitute using both hands.

My partisan point of view? Sorry. Doesn't apply in this. I happen to hate the principals of both parties that are unified in opposition to Trump's efforts to help the American people.

It's your partisan point of view that is blinding you to the obvious real world events being demonstrated daily with actual facts and evidence.

You blindly accept anything that attacks Trump and blindly dismiss anything that exposes any Democrat. Trouble is, there is no evidence to support your position.

 

[Dittohead not!]

What you seem to be entirely ignorant of is the plain and simple fact that the investigation being conducted by Muldoon and the Gang That Won't Shoot Straight is a partisan witch hunt.

Why is it that the Democrats involved in this whole mess are entirely and completely ignored by Muldoon and his henchmen?

The FBI's Office of Professional Responsibility and the Office of the Inspector General both recognize that something stinks in all of this among their ranks, but poor Muldoon couldn't find either this or his pitute using both hands.

My partisan point of view? Sorry. Doesn't apply in this. I happen to hate the principals of both parties that are unified in opposition to Trump's efforts to help the American people.

It's your partisan point of view that is blinding you to the obvious real world events being demonstrated daily with actual facts and evidence.

You blindly accept anything that attacks Trump and blindly dismiss anything that exposes any Democrat. Trouble is, there is no evidence to support your position.

You need to review the difference between fact and opinion.

Punishing a man by firing him days before his retirement is pure unadulterated vindictiveness. What we need to ask ourselves is what he really did to threaten the power elite, and what effect his firing might have on others in similar positions.

Get too close to Trump and his relationship with Putin, and you risk being targeted.