Its a radical sect of Islam. We discriminate against terrorists, don't we? Plus, it isn't discrimination since there interpetation to Islam does not have an official status.
No it's not, you're discriminating against someone who wanted to wear a swimsuit with a hood on it; not a group of terrorists.
Thats because they choose not to work, learn the language or integrate. They live in Europe without even learning the language, most of them. And thats the Turks! So imagine how much more conservative these bunch are. Dont move to a country if your not already familiar with the language or cultural ways, otherwise your asking for trouble.
They can't get proper jobs, they can't integrate into society. They are kept in the slums and not allowed to improve their lot. You have to allow free access to the society and workplaces if you want people to integrate into it. We're not talking on the whole about terrorists or anything like that. On the whole, Muslims in France are terrible disparaged against, and until that ends you aren't going to foster integration into the society.
Can you prove this fact? Your just making ridiculous accusations while remaining ignorant as to WHY they are left out; they havent integrated with US, or learnt OUR language. If they cannot do that, how can we invite them in?
All you have to do is take an honest look at the system. The slums are inhabited primarily by the Muslim community. It's hard to break into jobs because of the horrible amounts of socialism which permeate the French job markets. Sure, they can try harder to integrate but France has to make it possible to integrate as well.
If the people didnt believe a certain law made a neccessary compromise to a certain right, they will seek to enroach that law made. This is not the case with the Bhurka ban, the people have that choice, and they dont use it, because the French also share with the government its need and that feeling of importance to preserve the native culture which is being trashed by 3rd world citizens.
Well teach them to surrender, and they'll fit right in with the French.
hahah
j/k
But some of these bans are against free expression and practice of religion. I think there can be reasonable claims with IDs and things of that nature, but just wearing a swimsuit with a hood on it goes over the line.
No, im saying small restrictions of freedoms and rights have been HAPPENING here and there in the US. Im not saying that should happen, thats totally wrong. Eg; the hate speech.
There's no law against hate speech in America, those laws are stupid and encroach on the right to freedom of speech. Hate crime legislation, which we do have, is also right out. A crime is a crime and should be treated as such. It doesn't matter if it was perpetrated because of racism or any other form of hate, the crime is to be punished if you infringed upon the rights of others. End of story.
How is it fascism when the government inacts a law that affects a small minority in the country to help stem a native culture that is receding and social tensions in France that is being stirred by such people who refuse to integrate, when the majority of those French people in the country are accepting of such a ban?
You're talking of freedom through the health and power of the State, that's fascism. You don't enslave your freedom to the whims of the State, that's fascism. The State isn't the end all be all of legitimate power, the People are. When you start making arguments based on the prosperity of the State at the cost of liberty and freedom of the individual, you are walking in the realm of fascism.