- Joined
- Apr 28, 2015
- Messages
- 104,027
- Reaction score
- 94,602
- Location
- Third Coast
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
:lamo"Sure, sweetie, your Mustang is a Mustang too."
:lamo"Sure, sweetie, your Mustang is a Mustang too."
"Prince" :2razz:God of Darkness!
Seems off topic, I know...but stick with me, here, it will relate, trust me.
You got Ford fans, and Chevy fans, in the racing community. And of course, all of them, be it a mustang or a camero, or a focus, or even a corvette, or modified. Changed.
Mustang guys have been dropping Chevy 350s into their stands for years, and camaro guys have long enjoyed using ford 9 bolt rear diffs.
So, the question...at what point is a mustang no longer a mustang? If I build a 5.0 notch back, full cage, LS1 (Chevy motor) with a t56 trans, and a Dana 44 rear (from a corvette), is it still a mustang? Why, or why not?
The current generation Camaro V6 is pretty sweet, too. Revs beautifully. I really enjoyed my test drive.Don't knock the modern 4's and v6 in the current iteration of the Stang they each put out over 300 ponies and weigh a couple hundred pounds less than the V8 version. But I have to admit your response made me laugh. :lol:
That's pretty much how I see it. The Shelby Cobra being the prime production example. Basically the only thing British on those is the coachwork. On my Triumph Spitfire I have a Motus V4 mounted to a Tremec T-56 light weight version with most the rest of the car with the exception of the dark lord Lucas's wiring, is from Triumph, the rear suspension is a modified Rotoflex that came on the GT6. I still think of my Spitfire as Triumph and British just slightly modified.
No.
This is worse than standing on graves for political purpose. It's worse than standing on soldiers. You're standing on muscle cars. How dare you?
Hmm... I guess it depends on whether you care more about the superficial appearance or what's under the hood.![]()
Yeah. I know.
But its a problem. People want to be called something that other people don't think they are. Its kinda like race, too. What IS black? African American, lol? Plenty of white folk born and raised in Africa...for generations. But they ain't black.
Appearances. That's what matters.
I think you misspelled “content of their character.”
Hmm... I guess it depends on whether you care more about the superficial appearance or what's under the hood.![]()
You don't get that from a person you pass on the street, or a stranger you see walking into a restroom.
What if you don't know what's under the hood...you just see it going by one day?
I don’t buy your argument equating cars with people. I kinda got why you chose this forum and the OP, but I don’t agree.....as to your quote that appearances is what matters, that’s way too superficial, imo
Spitfire? Must have masochist bent! I was big into TR-3s in the 1970s. Had a yard full of projects. About 15 years ago I bought a restored 1959. When you are 20 a car with minimal suspension is no big worry, at 55+ it’s a little different. I drove a ‘56 from San Jose to Ft Bragg in ’73. Another adventure....
Does it come with a skirt?
But that's who we are.
You're walking down the street, and you see a hot chick go by, that was a girl. Or a guy in a suit pass, with a beard...you think, that's a dude. Content of character don't enter into it.
What passes me by is of little importance, what I take for a ride or buy just might.![]()
I'm not convinced that ground effects skirts would do much to make a brick such as the Mustang corner any faster.
Just for the record Id never own either a Mustang or a Camaro. I like the Focus ST or the Fiesta ST. The Focus is an American made GTi that doesn't cost you $700 every time Hans and Franz open the hood.
Yes...but the vast majority of cars you see, you aren't going to get in, drive, or buy...and you ID them primarily by appearance.
I routinely drive mine on long trips. I used to race SCCA events with a Spitfire, I loved kicking Ferrari and Porsches ass, they could never go near as deep into a turn as I could, They would catch up on a straightway only to have to back out in a turn. I always thought of my Spitfire as a supped up go kart and drove it like that. Passing vehicles at speed is an experience as my car is so light the back wash of air really effects it as I pass. I make it a point to pass quickly as that backwash makes the handling squirrelly.
You the sort that goes around opening hoods?........:mrgreen:
Yep, and that ID from afar makes no difference to them (or me).
Seems off topic, I know...but stick with me, here, it will relate, trust me.
You got Ford fans, and Chevy fans, in the racing community. And of course, all of them, be it a mustang or a camero, or a focus, or even a corvette, or modified. Changed.
Mustang guys have been dropping Chevy 350s into their stands for years, and camaro guys have long enjoyed using ford 9 bolt rear diffs.
So, the question...at what point is a mustang no longer a mustang? If I build a 5.0 notch back, full cage, LS1 (Chevy motor) with a t56 trans, and a Dana 44 rear (from a corvette), is it still a mustang? Why, or why not?
I'm not convinced that ground effects skirts would do much to make a brick such as the Mustang corner any faster.
Just for the record Id never own either a Mustang or a Camaro. I like the Focus ST or the Fiesta ST. The Focus is an American made GTi that doesn't cost you $700 every time Hans and Franz open the hood.
God of Darkness!