Liks has been said over and over again, he took the plea to end the expense of a defense.
End then moved to withdraw guilty plea, and get Trump through back channels to get Barr to force a motion to dismiss charges, incurring even more expense?
:lamo
See this is why you don't get taken seriously. You spit out
things random lying propagandists on Fox say as if they are truth. As if you claiming someone else said that the only reason he plead guilty was "to end the expense of a defense" means that that is, in fact, why he plead guilty.
You can't know that, not unless there are actual recorded conversations between Flynn and his original attorneys (and I cannot imagine why there would be, unless it was written correspondence) and Flynn waived attorney-client privilege to them (I can't imagine why), AND those recordings bore that out.
You aren't operating based on facts. You just tell any lie and act like it's the truth. The sole goal is to protect Team Trump and tell yourself that all the ugliness you engage in is justified
because look at what those meanyhead liberals made you do.
You'll say it even though Flynn's next move was to invite much more expense. Instead of merely paying lawyers through a trial, he is now paying lawyers to litigate this unprecedented motion to dismiss, to fight about it in the circuit court too, yadda yadda. Just like a 9/11 truther, your conspiracy theory defeats itself. It makes no sense because you never thought it through beginning to end.
Pure, unmitigated bull.
And here's a little clue: when you're a man of means and connections, "expense" is a hell of a lot better than a felony conviction. If you're acquitted you can get back on your feet. Completely different than the poor guy who cannot afford bail but knows he is innocent asking himself whether he could spend as much or more than the max sentence waiting for trial, lose everything in pursuing trial, be acquitted, and then be homeless...