solletica
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2011
- Messages
- 6,073
- Reaction score
- 926
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
Actually I think all of them have admitted to it.
Big whoopie. After having been locked up and waterboarded in Guantanamo for all these years, who wouldn't admit to it ? Besides anyone who hated a country a lot would only be too glad to admit to doing something like 9/11 against it.
Bottom line is that admission does not prove guilt.
The only one I don't think admitted to the 9/11 plot that is on trial is the person who admitted to killing Pearl. Either way, there is indeed evidence.
Then kindly cite the evidence, i. e. fingerprints, verifiable witness accounts, etc. that would suggest that they were responsible and/or involved in planning/executing 9/11.
FYI, US govt. allegations and/or statements the US govt. itself makes about what someone else said does not count as evidence. Nor does testimony taken under duress (i. e. torture).
I'm all for conducting trials when guilt is uncertain, but if they are admitting to it, the trial should be short and justice swift.
So if someone admits to something he/she didn't do simply to take credit for it (which is likely the case here), you have no problem allowing the real culprit to go free?