- Joined
- Aug 11, 2011
- Messages
- 75,431
- Reaction score
- 47,679
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Here is one attack currently inspiring outrage:
:lamo
Anything beats selling the US military for fake news.
You mean the IG believes it is possible for someone (Page) to have obvious biases and still not illegally act on them?? That type of judgement should also exonerate Trump on this impeachment hearing since there is all kinds of evidence Trump wanted Zelensky to investigate the Bidens and to investigate the Crowdstrike server but there is all kinds of evidence Trump never acted upon it.
Irony meter exploded.
You mean the IG believes it is possible for someone (Page) to have obvious biases and still not illegally act on them?? That type of judgement should also exonerate Trump on this impeachment hearing since there is all kinds of evidence Trump wanted Zelensky to investigate the Bidens and to investigate the Crowdstrike server but there is all kinds of evidence Trump never acted upon it.
You are defending a low life that ran a hate filled investigation on the low life that you don't like.
Classic Ecofarm..........keeping perfect stride.
From the OP's link:
Page opened a Twitter account Sunday, with a statement promoting her sympathetic interview with the Daily Beast published Sunday evening.
...Page expects to be cleared of wrongdoing by the IG report.
...The interview is getting the reaction it was designed to get: Page as victim and Trump as abuser:
“I want to retweet every paragraph of this so that everyone knows how Trump has abused Lisa Page the way he’s abused so many other women, physically, emotionally & psychologically. "I’m done being quiet": FBI Love Bird Lisa Page Breaks Silence on Eve of DOJ IG Report, Portrays Herself as Victim of President Trump
From retired FBI supervisory special agent and a CNN law enforcement analyst James Gagliano writing at The Hill:
These “humble public servants” were hell-bent on influencing efforts in two consequential FBI investigations in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election. And now we have irrefutable proof they were complicit in a Department of Justice (DOJ) “media leak strategy” and aware of other government entities that were “leaking like mad” to the press.
...let’s not pretend the IG’s report didn’t identify nefarious intentions by Strzok and others at the FBI and DOJ. As reported by the Washington Post in the wake of the report’s release, “The inspector general concluded that Strzok’s text, along with others disparaging Trump, ‘is not only indicative of a biased state of mind but, even more seriously, implies a willingness to take official action to impact the presidential candidate’s electoral prospects.’ The messages ‘potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations,’ the inspector general wrote.”
The #Resistance refuses to acknowledge more damning Strzok texts | TheHill
Or if she's really lucky, perhaps she'll hit the lecture circuit.
That is, if people buy her selling of herself as a victim.
The victim is Mrs. Strzok.
Yes, attorney Melissa Hodgman AND their three children.
And also Joseph Burrows, Page's husband, AND their two kids.
Soooo...seeing as she’s almost certainly going to be cleared of major wrongdoing by the IG report, your hatred for her will be based on....what....that she slept with a married man?
"...influencing efforts in two consequential FBI investigations in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election" is so vague as to be meaningless.
Are you capable of being honest, Cardinal, and not trying to manipulate? I've expressed no hatred for Page.
Well, when it comes to the desperate final hours of the resistance campaign, they have little choice. She must be a victim or they would have to face the real possibility that they have been played the fool for years.
So clarify for us, then. What’s your concern regarding her?
Claiming any kind of victimhood is mighty brazen.
You’re the one who started this thread with a rant from a trashy right wing blog.
One thing about Gateway Pundit that most of its audience never seems to notice, is that GP does no reporting.
This might come as a surprise to Trumpsters, who don’t seem to know the difference between news and the partisan editorial rants they substitute for news all along.
As with most GP pieces, this one was cribbed from somewhere else.
Uh, I'm participating on a thread about her new Twitter account and her attempting to position herself in advance of 12-9 as a victim. She's part of today's news cycle. Any more inane questions?
From the OP's link:
Page opened a Twitter account Sunday, with a statement promoting her sympathetic interview with the Daily Beast published Sunday evening.
...Page expects to be cleared of wrongdoing by the IG report.
...The interview is getting the reaction it was designed to get: Page as victim and Trump as abuser:
“I want to retweet every paragraph of this so that everyone knows how Trump has abused Lisa Page the way he’s abused so many other women, physically, emotionally & psychologically. "I’m done being quiet": FBI Love Bird Lisa Page Breaks Silence on Eve of DOJ IG Report, Portrays Herself as Victim of President Trump
Her timing does make one ponder...lol
Frankly, I would expect a moderator to be better informed and well versed in the tricks certain media plays.
The cribs from Daily Beast make up 90% of the GP article.
This is less than the typical GP product, which typically builds its content on selectively cribbed text from other sources.
GP does no reporting.
This piece, which is 100% political vitriol is typical. No new information. No original reporting.
Just cribbed excerpts, surrounded by vitriol and name calling.
This is the non-MSM forum, which allows for any potentially schlock news source anyone chooses to post. Were you expecting something else in this forum?