FBI going to investigation possible corruption within itself

[Barnacle]

Rick Grenell is to the Democrat-Socialist conspirators what my lawn mower is to the blades of grass in my lawn. The grass is once again over reaching and it's time, TODAY, for me to take care of the problem.
Every time Grenell declassifies another document hidden by our dirty cops and our thug police, we get another step closer to exposing the dirt they've been hiding.
I'm lovin' it!

Ratcliff will be sworn in today. I very much hope he continues Grenell's "work" and releases more info on those 5 corrupt FBI levels.

 

[Helix]

More conservative noise and distraction. It's sickening, one after another and it's all nothing but bull**** and conspiratorial hoaxes.

Dismiss everything that Trumpists say as a lie unless there is proof otherwise.

 

[code1211]

Ratcliff will be sworn in today. I very much hope he continues Grenell's "work" and releases more info on those 5 corrupt FBI levels.

Radcliff has talked the talk in the past.

I hope he walks the walk.

 

[code1211]

Dismiss everything that Trumpists say as a lie.

With as much respect as I can muster, are you in favor of the FBI withholding exculpatory evidence from judges in order to rig prosecutions?

 

[Barnacle]

Radcliff has talked the talk in the past.
I hope he walks the walk.

Yeah; I am a bit worried about that, too.

 

[HumblePi]

The plot thickens. FBI Director Chris Ray wants to get to the bottom of all the **** bubbling around him



I can hear the sphincters slamming shut throughout the J. Edgar Hoover Building from here. :lamo

If you're going to pander a cheap conspiracy theory around the internet, at least get the 'scoundrels' name correct. It's W-R-A-Y.

 

[HumblePi]

He didn't redefine them. He only shined a light on what they have become. They are dirty cops breaking the law, violating rights, attacking citizens and rigging prosecutions by withholding exculpatory evidence.

In what way(s) do the violations of law, procedure, policy and ethics negatively impact our national security?

Of what value is national security if it imposes all of the injustices from which we seek to be secured?

Yeah, yeah, 'everyone is dirty' except the real crooks, Trump and his evil administration.

 

[Helix]

With as much respect as I can muster, are you in favor of the FBI withholding exculpatory evidence from judges in order to rig prosecutions?

Huh? Oh, ok. Let's make **** up! Are you in favor of burning teddy bears and using nitro glycerine in pogo sticks?

Hooray!

 

[Bullseye]

If you're going to pander a cheap conspiracy theory around the internet, at least get the 'scoundrels' name correct. It's W-R-A-Y.

LOL, if the best you've going is spelling Nazi nonsense, I made my point.

 

[Barnacle]

Radcliff has talked the talk in the past.
I hope he walks the walk.

We are about to find out ... hopefully in the next few days. Grenell finished declassifying ...

Today - "Richard Grenell has declassified a new batch of Russia probe documents on his way out as acting director of national intelligence, leaving the decision on whether to make those files public up to newly sworn-in Director John Ratcliffe. ..."

Grenell declassifies slew of Russia probe files, as Ratcliffe takes helm as DNI | Fox News

 

[HumblePi]

LOL, if the best you've going is spelling Nazi nonsense, I made my point.

I don't know what you're talking about. What do you mean exactly? Be more specific.

 

[code1211]

Ratcliff will be sworn in today. I very much hope he continues Grenell's "work" and releases more info on those 5 corrupt FBI levels.

I ran into this comment yesterday and again today.

Is the word "levels" a typo? What does it mean?

 

[Barnacle]

I ran into this comment yesterday and again today.
Is the word "levels" a typo? What does it mean?

FBI director is level 1. The political game playing is "handled" in the top 5 FBI levels.

 

[code1211]

Yeah, yeah, 'everyone is dirty' except the real crooks, Trump and his evil administration.

The news has been filled with a story of Minneapolis Cops inappropriately targeting a victim and abusing their authority and power resulting in the deprivation of civil rights severe injury to the citizen.

The news has been filled with many stories of Federal Police inappropriately targeting a victim and abusing their authority and power resulting in the deprivation of civil rights severe injury to the citizen.

Do you defend BOTH both actions of the abuse of power by dirty cops or only the one that your lying propagandist handlers tell you to defend?

 

[code1211]

Huh? Oh, ok. Let's make **** up! Are you in favor of burning teddy bears and using nitro glycerine in pogo sticks?

Hooray!

Do your propaganda sources carry no actual news?

The Remarkable Prosecution Of Michael Flynn
<snip>
In short, the documents strongly suggested that the FBI’s sole purpose for interviewing Flynn was to catch him in a perjury trap, and that prosecutors had failed to disclose exculpatory evidence to Flynn’s lawyers.

Following the release of the aforementioned documents, the DOJ moved to dismiss its case against Flynn, arguing that continuing the prosecution “would not serve the interests of justice.”
<snip>

 

[Helix]

Do your propaganda sources carry no actual news?

The Remarkable Prosecution Of Michael Flynn
<snip>
In short, the documents strongly suggested that the FBI’s sole purpose for interviewing Flynn was to catch him in a perjury trap, and that prosecutors had failed to disclose exculpatory evidence to Flynn’s lawyers.

Following the release of the aforementioned documents, the DOJ moved to dismiss its case against Flynn, arguing that continuing the prosecution “would not serve the interests of justice.”
<snip>

Looks like the take home is don't lie to the FBI and then plead guilty. ****, i think i could go all day without doing that. I hope that you can, too.

 

[code1211]

We are about to find out ... hopefully in the next few days. Grenell finished declassifying ...

Today - "Richard Grenell has declassified a new batch of Russia probe documents on his way out as acting director of national intelligence, leaving the decision on whether to make those files public up to newly sworn-in Director John Ratcliffe. ..."

Grenell declassifies slew of Russia probe files, as Ratcliffe takes helm as DNI | Fox News

What we need is a "Pentagon Papers" kind of release of the whole sordid mess.

Given the extent of the time line in this, it's likely that 6000 pages is just the tip of the ice berg.

I've heard that the thugs and goons conducting the Mueller Investigation reviewed the FBI documents and knew in the first month of the swindle that there was NOTHING to investigate.

The subsequent multi-month, multi million dollar investigation supported exactly what they found in that first month.

The lying butt holes parading on TV from the Obama Administration and the lying butt holes in the Congressional Crap Show must have similar exculpatory evidence that they hid with every lie and every slimy word oozed from their diseased mouths.

It's time too get it all out there.

 

[code1211]

FBI director is level 1. The political game playing is "handled" in the top 5 FBI levels.

Wouldn't it have been refreshing if the new FBI Director had not turned out to be as corrupt and as bureau-centric as the previous ones?

As an optimist, I was really hoping he was going to clean house.

It appears now that he was only trying to wash the stink off.

 

[code1211]

Looks like the take home is don't lie to the FBI and then plead guilty. ****, i think i could go all day without doing that. I hope that you can, too.

You seem to have been less blindly biased in the past.

You might change your mind if the FBI or other police entities decide to ruin you. Regardless of that, though, we give our police unusual power.

Abuse of that power by police is to be condemned. Errors of judgement made in the blink of an eye can be simple mistakes. Prolonged over time, abuses of power are not errors of judgement. They are intentional abuses of power.

Whether we find police abusing their power in the Michael Flynn frame up or in the George Floyd killing, abuse of the unusual powers we accord to police officers need to be checked in every reasonable way.

 

[Helix]

You seem to have been less blindly biased in the past.

You might change your mind if the FBI or other police entities decide to ruin you. Regardless of that, though, we give our police unusual power.

Abuse of that power by police is to be condemned. Errors of judgement made in the blink of an eye can be simple mistakes. Prolonged over time, abuses of power are not errors of judgement. They are intentional abuses of power.

Whether we find police abusing their power in the Michael Flynn frame up or in the George Floyd killing, abuse of the unusual powers we accord to police officers need to be checked in every reasonable way.

I'd probably not lie for an imbecile who wouldn't piss on me if I was on fire. After trying that strategy first, I would probably decide not to plead guilty, as I wouldn't have lied for a spray painted orange waterhead in the first place.

 

[What if...?]

Wow, massive amounts of "nuh-uh" coming from the left side of the forum. I must have scoured a direct hit on a Democult meeting. :lamo

So do you have the next investigation cued up for when Durham comes up with nothing of moment.

I, for one, and still waiting for the amazing things Grumps operatives in Hawaii were just about to release about Obama's birth certificate.

And how many benghazi investigations do we have again with nothing found? Seven?

I have also noticed that Hillary is not in jail.

So what exactly should I be concerned about?

 

[Bullseye]

So do you have the next investigation cued up for when Durham comes up with nothing of moment.

I, for one, and still waiting for the amazing things Grumps operatives in Hawaii were just about to release about Obama's birth certificate.

And how many benghazi investigations do we have again with nothing found? Seven?

I have also noticed that Hillary is not in jail.

So what exactly should I be concerned about?

Dang! I hope no one lights a match! With all these strawmen flying around we'd have a conflagration!

 

[code1211]

I'd probably not lie for an imbecile who wouldn't piss on me if I was on fire. After trying that strategy first, I would probably decide not to plead guilty, as I wouldn't have lied for a spray painted orange waterhead in the first place.

Of course, as observed by the agents who interviewed him, Flynn did not lie. So you and Flynn were on the same page with that.

Flynn fought the good fight for years and entered his plea only to protect his son from similar abuse of power tactics when the DOJ Goons made that ADDITIONAL illegal threat on top of all of the others.

You are ignoring the actual crime and accepting as fact the lies told by the police abusing their power.

Why are you doing this? Are you supporting abuse of power by our policing entities? Are you in favor of the murder of Mr. Floyd at the hands of police?

What happened to you?

 

[Helix]

Of course, as observed by the agents who interviewed him, Flynn did not lie. So you and Flynn were on the same page with that.

Flynn fought the good fight for years and entered his plea only to protect his son from similar abuse of power tactics when the DOJ Goons made that ADDITIONAL illegal threat on top of all of the others.

You are ignoring the actual crime and accepting as fact the lies told by the police abusing their power.

Why are you doing this? Are you supporting abuse of power by our policing entities? Are you in favor of the murder of Mr. Floyd at the hands of police?

What happened to you?

Well, one thing that happened is that I didn't lie to the FBI and then plead guilty.

 

[code1211]

Well, one thing that happened is that I didn't lie to the FBI and then plead guilty.

As I read this, it makes me sad.