• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Exxon Prevails in Court

RetiredUSN said:
I guess you didn't mean what you meant to say to begin with.........even though everyone knows what you meant.
Click to expand...

Just stop, RUSN. You're embarrassing yourself with your desperate attempt to insert words into my mouth that simply do not exist. :lol:
 
Phys251 said:
Just stop, RUSN. You're embarrassing yourself with your desperate attempt to insert words into my mouth that simply do not exist. :lol:
Click to expand...

Sorry, but you're the only one embarrassing yourself (just like last time). The plaintiffs lost on the merits.
 
Another example of wanna-be socialist cities abusing our court system because they can't get the whole country to pass the laws they want to impose on everyone.
 
Jack Hays said:
Sorry, but you're the only one embarrassing yourself
Click to expand...

I'm rubber, you're glue. :)

The plaintiffs lost on the merits.
Click to expand...

You mean, the plaintiffs lost because the defendants had the best attorneys that money can buy, making their case almost unloseable.
 
Jack Hays said:
Good lawyers lose in court all the time, and the plaintiffs had high-end legal talent on their side too.
Click to expand...

Not a proof. Not even close. Try again.
 
Jack Hays said:
Good lawyers lose in court all the time, and the plaintiffs had high-end legal talent on their side too.
Click to expand...

Especially when one of them is the states ATTORNEY GENERAL!

:lol:
 
[FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[h=1]Judges Explain Why They Are Knocking Down Enviro Attempts To Sue Oil Companies Into Oblivion[/h][FONT=&quot]From The Daily Caller Chris White Tech Reporter January 21, 2020 4:30 PM ET Activists who are working to level lawsuits on oil companies and the federal government are reeling after a series of brutal defeats, with one environmentalist saying a child-led climate lawsuit was a “big ask.” Judges have nixed climate lawsuits leveled at…
Continue reading →
[/FONT]
 
[FONT=&quot]Climate News[/FONT]
[h=1]BUSTED: State climate lawsuits are all about ignoring legislature to get cash stream[/h][FONT=&quot]From Government Accountability & Oversight Transparency Group Provides Federal Court of Appeals with Records Proving State “Climate” Lawsuit is to Obtain “Sustainable Funding Stream”, After Failing to Convince Legislature to Fund its Priorities BOSTON, MA, March 10, 2020 – The Transparency group Energy Policy Advocates (“EPA”) yesterday filed a motion with the United States Court…
[/FONT]
 
Jack Hays said:
“The office of the Attorney General failed to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that ExxonMobil made any material misstatements or omissions about its practices and procedures that misled any reasonable investor,” Ostrager wrote in a 55-page ruling. The AG “produced no testimony either from any investor who claimed to have been misled by any disclosure,” the judge said.
Click to expand...

They don't need to read the facts. They are the true deniers of fact, reason, and science. They have their faith, and that's all they need.

The Bloomberg article is obviously denied by them.

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

They couldn't show that Exxon violated the Martin Act - Wikipedia

Just how stupid were the lawyers bring this case to trial, anyway?
 
Phys251 said:
A big oil company prevails in a lawsuit with the best attorneys that money can buy.

In other news, water is wet.
Click to expand...

That's right. Deny the facts in the supporting article.
 
Sunsettommy said:
Ha ha, you have yet to explain why the Prosecution didn't get any of the investors to testify they were being allegedly mislead by Exxon.

From the 55 page ruling:



You think you can do better than the States Attorney General?



Cheers
Click to expand...

Out of the millions of investors in Exxon, they couldn't find one single person?

Wow... Why didn't they know they had no case?
 
Steve Case said:
Click to expand...


Irreversible is totally stupid. Putting them in jail for something not specified?

Man... This is the guy democrats will most likely be voting for in Novemeber, and they call president Trump stupid.

Has there ever been a speech Biden hasn't said stupid things?
 
Lord of Planar said:
They don't need to read the facts. They are the true deniers of fact, reason, and science. They have their faith, and that's all they need.

The Bloomberg article is obviously denied by them.

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

They couldn't show that Exxon violated the Martin Act - Wikipedia

Just how stupid were the lawyers bring this case to trial, anyway?
Click to expand...

They run on ideology, that is why they torture anything to maintain their ideological delusion.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom