• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ex-Forbes reporter says Trump posed as spokesman, lied to him to embellish wealth

and other than another TDS Trump hate thread, what the hell does this have to do with today at all?

how many threads do you need to post to show how much you dislike and revile the man?

we get it....i dont like him much either....so what

he is duly elected, and until removed from office, he is OUR president

this was over 30 years ago....give it up
 
iLOL
You didn't have to as the 5mil vs 100mil figures are what is being discussed. Not something else.

Maybe in your mind. All I said was who lies about his wealth.
You said the claim entirely was unsupported, and you can't admit that I was right. Trump lies about his wealth. Doesn't matter the number apparently.
 
The story broke today.

Also no thanksies. I'm not in the business of pleasing you guys. Don't like it, don't comment.

so something that happened 30+ years ago is "breaking news" to you

i realize someone may have written it lately...

just because they keep digging for trash, doesnt mean you have to pick it up

:peace
 
So you don't think pointing out that something is really irrelevant matters?
1. Good to know.
2. Don't point out that something is irrelevant then.

Who the hell do you think you are? You don't get to decide for other people what is relevant.
 
Maybe in your mind. All I said was who lies about his wealth.
And absent any other reference, would only be in reference to the topic.
So take your silly little game somewhere else.


You said the claim entirely was unsupported, and you can't admit that I was right.
You are not right.
It is an unsupported opinion. If you do not understand that is in reference to the topic of discussion, that is your ignorance at play. Either that, or you are playing a silly little game.



Trump lies about his wealth. Doesn't matter the number apparently.
Apparently not by the information you provided. But again, this is about the reporters unsupported claim in regards to 5mil vs 100mil that was reported on all the way back in the 80's.
 
An author who has written a number of books on trump for decades once claimed in one of his books that trump was actually worth about 265 million while trump was claiming to be a billionaire.

Trump sued him...

Trump lost...

The dirtbag Trump suing the guy for FIVE BILLION dollars is only the second best part of that story.

That he lost that suit...bigly, is the best.
 
Who the hell do you think you are? You don't get to decide for other people what is relevant.

Hilarious.

So what you are really slaying is that you do not have the ability to distinguish between what is relevant and what is irrelevant.
Figures.

What is the topic about huh? An in-general claim, or a specific claim in regards to something that occurred back in the 80's? Do you need help answering that question?
 
Trump exaggerating is news?

:doh

Isn't everything he does/will do get categorized as the "best ever", or "never in the history of [insert name] has [embellished action]"?
 
From the 80's?? LOL!!

Dude...I'm a good guy now, but I wasn't such a good guy back in the 80's. Seems to be the same for Trump. Amazing what more than 30 years will do to a person, eh?

He never really changed his MO though; all 30 years have done is age him and make him more "pleasantly plump".
 
Apparently not by the information you provided. But again, this is about the reporters unsupported claim in regards to 5mil vs 100mil that was reported on all the way back in the 80's.

Trump once said he was worth $10 billion with no proof. Not a stretch to believe that Trump said he was worth $100 million when he was really worth $5. Also, there is a tape of him lying about it. You lose.
 
Trump once said he was worth $10 billion with no proof. Not a stretch to believe that Trump said he was worth $100 million when he was really worth $5. Also, there is a tape of him lying about it. You lose.

Excon doesn't care if Trump lies. In fact I think he seems to like it when Trump lies. It's like people wearing a hair shirt to punish themselves.
 
Hilarious.

So what you are really slaying is that you do not have the ability to distinguish between what is relevant and what is irrelevant.
Figures.

What is the topic about huh? An in-general claim, or a specific claim in regards to something that occurred back in the 80's? Do you need help answering that question?

What part of you don't get to decide for other people what is relevant are you not getting?

If YOU don't think it matters to you, don't post about it.

This isn't hard. Walk are if you don't care, or continue to display your duplicity.
 
Last edited:
From the 80's?? LOL!!

Dude...I'm a good guy now, but I wasn't such a good guy back in the 80's. Seems to be the same for Trump. Amazing what more than 30 years will do to a person, eh?

How many alter ego's did you have? Two, three?
 
Apparently you just want to argue to argue.
You were wrong, get over it.


Trump once said he was worth $10 billion with no proof.
And. He doesn't have to provided proof to state how much he is worth.


Not a stretch to believe that Trump said he was worth $100 million when he was really worth $5.
I do not care if you think it is a stretch or not.
It is an unsupported claim by the reporter. That is fact. What you think is irrelevant to that.


Also, there is a tape of him lying about it. You lose.
Wrong. It is you who has lost as already shown.

And who is supposedly on the tape is an allegation, not proven. So again you are wrong..
 
Apparently you just want to argue to argue.
You were wrong, get over it.


And. He doesn't have to provided proof to state how much he is worth.


I do not care if you think it is a stretch or not.
It is an unsupported claim by the reporter. That is fact. What you think is irrelevant to that.



Wrong. It is you who has lost as already shown.

And who is supposedly on the tape is an allegation, not proven. So again you are wrong..

Your argument only makes sense if you believe Trump.
 
Try again, con, who claims to not care, but is kicking up a holy hell-storm, not caring.

Trump admitted in court testimony he's been known to go by John Barron.
 
Your argument only makes sense if you believe Trump.

The TrumpCult demands unwavering loyalty and support. Eternally.

There are some who would literally take a bullet for him, rather than let a disparaging word be uttered against their God Emperor Cult Leader.
 
Back
Top Bottom