Evidence doesn't support claims against Kavanaugh, prosecutor says

[ALiberalModerate]

Oh riiiiiiight, Kavanuagh's name was never folated out there as an SC nominee.

Stop embarassing yourself. If Merrick Garland was sitting in Kavanugh's chair and some *right wing Republican* woman was leveling the the same paper thin charges against him, ( and sounded just as wifty as she did) you know you wouldn't be going though all these gymnastics to prop her up and bring him down.

Kavanaugh was on the short list of possible nominees well before he was nominated.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trumps-supreme-court-list/

So it actually looks like you are embarrassing yourself on this one. In fact, if I am not mistaken, Trump floated Kavanaugh as a possible nominee all the way back during the campaign in 2016.

 

[Moderate Right]

Really … got link?

Seriously? About 2-3 Democratic senators said they would vote for Kavannaugh. Everyone else was firmly against.

 

[KLATTU]

Kavanaugh was on the short list of possible nominees well before he was nominated.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trumps-supreme-court-list/

So it actually looks like you are embarrassing yourself on this one. In fact, if I am not mistaken, Trump floated Kavanaugh as a possible nominee all the way back during the campaign in 2016.

LAFF RIOT . wel I see that point went right over my head. In your gymnastics routine to make Ford seem credible, YOU were the one who asserted she told Feinstein before he was even nominated. My brilliant pount , affirmed by you, ( thanks!) was that she had a pretty good idea he would be nominated.

 

[Moderate Right]

Sure, this woman contacts her Senator before Kavanaugh was even nominated, she doesn't go public until her letter is leaked, she takes a polygraph, she asks for a FBI investigation, but she is the liar...... Yeah, see not buying that. She had nothing at all to gain from any of this.

Sure she does. She is a livid anti-Trumpster and pro-abortionist who fears Kavannaugh will overturn RvW.

 

[Irwin Corey]

Originally Posted by StuPedaso
Really … got link?

Seriously? About 2-3 Democratic senators said they would vote for Kavannaugh. Everyone else was firmly against.

So .. no.

 

[Moderate Right]

Oh riiiiiiight, Kavanuagh's name was never folated out there as an SC nominee.

Stop embarassing yourself. If Merrick Garland was sitting in Kavanugh's chair and some *right wing Republican* woman was leveling the the same paper thin charges against him, ( and sounded just as wifty as she did) you know you wouldn't be going though all these gymnastics to prop her up and bring him down.

That one information that came out was that in 2012 Ford was afraid that Romney might win over Obama and appoint Kavannaugh to the Court so all of a sudden she secretly started this campaign against Kavannaugh but when Obama won it was all shelved and brought back up again now, 6 years later.

 

[Moderate Right]

Kavanaugh was on the short list of possible nominees well before he was nominated.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trumps-supreme-court-list/

So it actually looks like you are embarrassing yourself on this one. In fact, if I am not mistaken, Trump floated Kavanaugh as a possible nominee all the way back during the campaign in 2016.

Ford started this campaign against Kavannaugh back in 2012 when she was afraid Romney might beat Obama and appoint Kavannaugh to the Court and then shelved all of those plans when that didn't happen, bringing her plan to fruition now when Trump appointed Kavannaugh, six years later. The seeds were already planted in 2012.

 

[KLATTU]

Ford started this campaign against Kavannaugh back in 2012 when she was afraid Romney might beat Obama and appoint Kavannaugh to the Court and then shelved all of those plans when that didn't happen, bringing her plan to fruition now when Trump appointed Kavannaugh, six years later. The seeds were already planted in 2012.

Liberals tend to lack the ability to see outside the liberal bubble. Else the ridiculously stupid question " what did she have to gain" would never be asked.

 

[Moderate Right]

Liberals tend to lack the ability to see outside the liberal bubble. Else the ridiculously stupid question " what did she have to gain" would never be asked.

Yup. That is about the stupidest question I have heard from the left, wondering what a pro-abortion liberal activist has to gain by taking Kavannaugh down.

 

[Lord of Planar]

https://www.aol.com/article/news/20...s-against-kavanaugh-prosecutor-says/23547150/



Also, the Maryland PD of the city she claims she thinks it happened in, invited her to file a report as there is no statute of limitations for sexually assault in Maryland.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bethb...ey-respond-to-state-lawmakers-reques-n2523791

So now it's time for her to fish or cut bait. And it is time for the FBI to subpoena Go Fund Me records to see if her sudden windfall is the result of principally one or two big donors, AKA "Go Launder a Bribe for Me".

Yep.

See if she is making any money for this.

 

[Lord of Planar]

Okay well they cut her off before she could get anywhere.

Good point. She didn't have a gorbasm yet.

 

[ALiberalModerate]

Ford started this campaign against Kavannaugh back in 2012 when she was afraid Romney might beat Obama and appoint Kavannaugh to the Court and then shelved all of those plans when that didn't happen, bringing her plan to fruition now when Trump appointed Kavannaugh, six years later. The seeds were already planted in 2012.

So otherwise, Ford was concerned that a man that sexually assaulted her as a teen would be nominated to the Supreme Court in 2012. When it was obvious he would not be, in that Romney lost, she did not publicly out him as who sexually assaulted her. It was only after he was on the short list of potential nominees to SCOTUS in 2018, did she contact her senator out of concern that the man who sexually assaulted her was being considered for a SCOTUS justice. Sounds like she did Kavannaugh a favor by only coming forward when he was being seriously considered for SCOTUS.

 

[ALiberalModerate]

LAFF RIOT . wel I see that point went right over my head. In your gymnastics routine to make Ford seem credible, YOU were the one who asserted she told Feinstein before he was even nominated. My brilliant pount , affirmed by you, ( thanks!) was that she had a pretty good idea he would be nominated.

So she did Kavanaugh a favor. Despite him having sexually assaulted her as a teen, she only came forward when he was seriously being considered for SCOTUS. Had he never been considered for SCOTUS, she would have never came forward despite the fact she was sexually assaulted by him.

 

[Lord of Planar]

So she did Kavanaugh a favor. Despite him having sexually assaulted her as a teen, she only came forward when he was seriously being considered for SCOTUS. Had he never been considered for SCOTUS, she would have never came forward despite the fact she was sexually assaulted by him.

Her claim.

The proper context would be "allegedly sexually assaulted."

What first hand facts do you have, or are you a useful idiot of the left?

 

[KLATTU]

Yup. That is about the stupidest question I have heard from the left, wondering what a pro-abortion liberal activist has to gain by taking Kavannaugh down.

Yeah really . Now why in the world would a lefty try to torpedo a *TRUMP* nominee?? I mean it's not like they dial up the freakout outrage to 11 every time he sneezes.

 

[Lord of Planar]

https://www.aol.com/article/news/20...s-against-kavanaugh-prosecutor-says/23547150/



Also, the Maryland PD of the city she claims she thinks it happened in, invited her to file a report as there is no statute of limitations for sexually assault in Maryland.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bethb...ey-respond-to-state-lawmakers-reques-n2523791

So now it's time for her to fish or cut bait. And it is time for the FBI to subpoena Go Fund Me records to see if her sudden windfall is the result of principally one or two big donors, AKA "Go Launder a Bribe for Me".

 

[KLATTU]

So she did Kavanaugh a favor. Despite him having sexually assaulted her as a teen, she only came forward when he was seriously being considered for SCOTUS. Had he never been considered for SCOTUS, she would have never came forward despite the fact she was sexually assaulted by him.

“How did you get home? I don’t remember. How did you get there? I don’t remember. Where is the place? I don’t remember. How many years ago was it? I don’t know. I don’t know. I don’t know.”

At this, the crowd at the rally guffawed. They cheered. They broke out into applause. The president, thus galvanized, thus supported, thus loved, continued his one-man interrogation: “What neighborhood was it in? I don’t know. Where’s the house? I don’t know. Upstairs, downstairs, where was it? I don’t know. But I had one beer. That’s the only thing I remember.”

LIBERALS: " I believe her"

 

[jnug]

The WH continues to call Ford an Accuser bringing forward accusations and continues to call this a case which it is not.

Dr Ford has brought forward Allegations. We should call her what she is, an alleger.

We should stop calling this a case which it is not. Until somebody brings charges, its not a case.

The prosecutor's notes that have been bandied about as having some relevance have no relevance as she stated the obvious, she did not have enough evidence to mount a prosecution. No kidding!!! Remember its the GOP that decided to bring in a prosecutor. Claiming now that her comment that she could not mount a prosecution based on what she heard is not relevant to anything other than the GOP's obfuscation and desire to pull the wool over our eyes.

The only GOP major figure that calls Dr Ford properly is McConnell who I guess did not get the memo. He properly calls these allegations and thus calls Dr Ford an alleger. Sara Sanders as usual is claiming to state facts when she states NONE!