- Joined
- Mar 31, 2013
- Messages
- 63,587
- Reaction score
- 28,955
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
I might take a look, but considering your viewpoint and the very mention of CO2, I have pretty much placed you in the category of a zealot. As such, I doubt seriously your commitment to science and I seriously doubt your understanding of it as well. You have a primarily political agenda, and that causes you to respond critically to any mention of a non-CO2 driver. You may continue to pretend that the prediction track record is on the money, but the facts demonstrate that the track record is abysmal. And yes, I can post links as a testament to AGW prediction failures.
In your case, I'd advise more reading and less poorly thought out posting.