Durham tells IG he can’t back right-wing theory that Russia case was U.S. intelligence setup

[Cardinal]

More like, "NYT source"...:lamo

If you have a legitimate source, then you should link to that.

 

[US&THEM]

Or perhaps most conservative Republicans are far more intellectually honest and diligent in their duties than their political opposition gives them credit for.

If you presume that Republicans are as idiotic as Donald Trump, you will find yourself constantly surprised.

Like Mueller a lifelong Republican.

 

[apdst]

If you have a legitimate source, then you should link to that.

The link is in my post. At least I didn't plagiarize anything. :lamo

 

[Hamish Howl]

"Hot Air."

It is my interest that right wingers bury themselves in a pile of wishful thinking poop.

 

[Cardinal]

The link is in my post. At least I didn't plagiarize anything. :lamo

Your link is to a Hot Air article.

 

[W_Heisenberg]

Or perhaps most conservative Republicans are far more intellectually honest and diligent in their duties than their political opposition gives them credit for.

If you presume that Republicans are as idiotic as Donald Trump, you will find yourself constantly surprised.

Bless your heart.

 

[Hamish Howl]

Bless your heart.

That's Southern belle for something, isn't it? :lol:

 

[Felis Leo]

Bless your heart.

Please. All blessings and praise belong to Allah.

 

[W_Heisenberg]

So which investigation will Republicans be hanging their hats on next?

They won't. After Trump, they will become a permanent minority party.

 

[apdst]

Your link is to a Hot Air article.

That cites a NYT piece. Do try to keep up...lol

 

[Hamish Howl]

That cites a NYT piece. Do try to keep up...lol

So you obviously should have no problem linking to the original article.

 

[Cardinal]

That cites a NYT piece. Do try to keep up...lol

If I click on your link I’ll effectively be giving Hot Air advertising dollars. I’m not going to do that. So if there’s a link to a nytimes article that supports some position of yours in any way, post that link here.

 

[apdst]

So you obviously should have no problem linking to the original article.

Why do you have a problem clicking on the link and reading the original article yourself? Are you just looking for something to bitch about?

 

[apdst]

If I click on your link I’ll effectively be giving Hot Air advertising dollars. I’m not going to do that. So if there’s a link to a nytimes article that supports some position of yours in any way, post that link here.

You scared, bro?...lol

 

[Athanasius68]

yawn...

More "people familiar with the matter". In other words...fake news.

Let me know when y'all have an actual quote of something Durham says. Until then...

Thread dismissed. (see my sig)

See-- here's the problem. Crime or bust.
When there so many more plausable theories to explain why the Obama Admin thought Trump was conspiring with Russia.

 

[Hamish Howl]

Why do you have a problem clicking on the link and reading the original article yourself? Are you just looking for something to bitch about?

Because you seem to have a vested interest in not linking directly to the article.

Almost as if the hot air article is misrepresenting the NYT article.

 

[apdst]

Because you seem to have a vested interest in not linking directly to the article.

Almost as if the hot air article is misrepresenting the NYT article.

Yeah, you're just looking for something to bitch about...lol

 

[Cardinal]

Because you seem to have a vested interest in not linking directly to the article.

Almost as if the hot air article is misrepresenting the NYT article.

There is basically a 100% chance that whatever Hot Air is saying Nytimes said, Nytimes didn't say it.

 

[Hamish Howl]

There is basically a 100% chance that whatever Hot Air is saying Nytimes said, Nytimes didn't say it.

I know. Which is why APSTD refuses to post the actual article.

 

[apdst]

There is basically a 100% chance that whatever Hot Air is saying Nytimes said, Nytimes didn't say it.

Prove it.

 

[CaughtInThe]

Rush and Sean have plenty more lies to spread.

And the rubes want to eat them up.

 

[apdst]

I know. Which is why APSTD refuses to post the actual article.

Don't alter my username.

Here's more, btw...

Report: IG has no evidence from Durham that Mifsud was a U.S. asset -- but does have evidence that FBI omitted concerns about dossier from FISA applications

 

[Hamish Howl]

Prove it.

So. No direct link.

 

[Hamish Howl]

Don't alter my username.

Here's more, btw...

Report: IG has no evidence from Durham that Mifsud was a U.S. asset -- but does have evidence that FBI omitted concerns about dossier from FISA applications

1. I am not obligated to remember your weird username.

2. Another hot air article. Pfffft.

 

[apdst]

So. No direct link.

If you think Hotair is lying, feel free to prove it. Otherwise, you're lying.