And it might have something to do with the fact that yanking a 15 yr old girl out of school, usually followed by a quick impregnation, means that she will be unable to support herself or her children in the future, because she doesn't have the education or ability to do so. Teaching young girls that they must rely on men to care for them for their entire lives might be Phil's idea of utopia, but it sure as hell isn't mine.
"Phil's time" was in the freaking 1960's... you know, hippies, free love, bra burning? He was not a product of the Victorian Age, for god sake. I was around in the 1960's, and believe me, women had the same hopes and dreams for their future then as they do now.
As for your statement about women today having no concept of being a home maker, I guess you'd have to describe what your concept of a home maker might be. If it's toiling from dusk to dawn polishing, mopping, cleaning toilets, changing diapers, getting meals on the table for menfolk, washing dishes and scrubbing the kitchen then bending over for a quick, perfunctory poke before falling into an exhausted sleep in order to get up and do the entire thing all over again, day after day for the rest of her life... then yes, yes I can agree that most of "today's women" would prefer a more varied and interesting life... including the joy of educating themselves, preparing for a time when the children are grown enough that they can actually do something that fulfills them as a person, rather than being just a cross between an unpaid maid and a free whore for their entire lives.