ItAin'tFree
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2013
- Messages
- 1,293
- Reaction score
- 338
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
What part of "false pretense" do you not understand.
The part you apply to the GOP but not the Dems.
What part of "false pretense" do you not understand.
That is still silly. Those are requirements in order to be a pilot or continue flying a plane. Those laws have their own problems, but they are not involuntary servitude since they have are directly tied to the passenger getting service. Quality of service perhaps, but not service itself.
Personally, I think anyone trying to compare a $695 penalty for not having health insurance to slavery and murder is a bit delusional. To the point where that person's interpretation of the constitution is suspect.
Really? Did he go to law school too?
I'll take my chances with Roberts or Scalia.
Being elected President of the USA is not a business, but if it was Barack Obama is pretty good at it.
No, it is service itself. I can literally go to jail for flying passengers around without a license. I can lose my license for flying passengers around without proper authorization and training.
Why is that? Heres what the Doctor said: "“Obamacare is really, I think, the worst thing that has happened in this nation since slavery,” Carson declared. “It is slavery in a way because it is making all of us subservient to the government.”
He is exactly correct.
No, it is service itself. I can literally go to jail for flying passengers around without a license. I can lose my license for flying passengers around without proper authorization and training.
The facts don't need changing. If you watched the video you would know that.Didn't know it was a contest. But I do know the death penalty stuff was nonsense. She didn't. She wasn't prepared for the media. She has made herself look silly. There's no one you can quote that would change these facts.
Aw, I see. So the lawyers on the supreme court have never made a mistake that was later changed. They must have never missed a connection or never misread the constitution, that's impressive.
The penalty is $95 dollars for the first year, not $695.Personally, I think anyone trying to compare a $695 penalty for not having health insurance to slavery and murder is a bit delusional. To the point where that person's interpretation of the constitution is suspect.
Care to back that up?
I lived in NY on 9/11/01 and I ****ing disagree.
The facts don't need changing. If you watched the video you would know that.
The penalty is $95 dollars for the first year, not $695.
So the fine is equivalent to buying a videogame+two controller+memory card.
No. A doctor. You guys never get this right. You have more. To fear from your insurance provider, who really is between you and your doctor. And he works for your employer, not you.
So the government isn't involved in Obamacare at all?
I never asked for your sympathy. I am however wondering how a state can justify taxing people for leaving the country for good.
In the care, no. Other than to improve insurance standards so more get care, no it isn't.
The trick, as many are discovering, is not to invest in the United States. That's why many companies are moving overseas or only hiring part time help. It's exceedingly important that the American people elect some responsible adults as soon as possible.
The Dems didn't drum us into a war over WMD when no such weapons existed.The part you apply to the GOP but not the Dems.
The case in question has to do with the government telling doctors how to provide their service. It has nothing to do with insurance.
The trick, as many are discovering, is not to invest in the United States. That's why many companies are moving overseas or only hiring part time help. It's exceedingly important that the American people elect some responsible adults as soon as possible.
Yes, flying passengers around is a service provided to consumers. Requiring someone to have a license to fly their plane and use it as they see fit is a violation of property rights.
Hardly. Not in the way we are discussing.