Donnie Dirtbag Smears a Juror To Get His Criminal Associates Off

[PirateMk1]

What Credico later claimed about the threat, does not erase the fact that the threat was made. Are you really enjoying defending the wonderfully evil Roger Stone?

The Credico did not take the statements at face value. He doubled down and said he and Stone always battered like this.

 

[TheDoctorWasIn]

The witness who Stone "threatened", told the FBI he was in no way threatened, that was the way he and Stone talked.

He told that to the jury, too - and yet they convicted Stone anyway.

Because the emotional state of the victim is not relevant to the elements of the crime.

 

[digitusmedius]

Read the article and you will be privy too.

A pukefunnel source like that? You might as well link directly to Donnie Dirtbag's asshole. You people just don't ever realize how you look to the rational world. That's what the Cult has done to you.

 

[TheDoctorWasIn]

It was a threat - that's why he was convicted of witness tampering.

Whether or not the victim felt the threat was "serious" is irrelevant.

 

[digitusmedius]

The Credico did not take the statements at face value. He doubled down and said he and Stone always battered like this.

You and your PoS source seems to have left out a lot of Credico's and other testimony. Shall I educate you? Yes, I shall:

“Prepare to die ...” Stone wrote in one profanity-laced text to Credico. “You are a rat.”

“I don’t know why you had to lie and say you had a backchannel,” Credico later told Stone in texts sent in early December 2017. “You could have just told them the truth ... You want me to cover you for perjury now.”

“I guarantee you, you are the one who gets indicted for perjury if you are stupid enough to testify,” Stone replied.

And [Stone] invoked Richard Nixon saying: 'Stonewall it, plead the fifth, anything to save the plan ... Richard Nixon.'

Kravis asked former FBI agent Michelle Taylor, the prosecution's first witness, however: 'On the 26th, on the same day he testified before the committee that his [Stone's] intermediary [Credico] was not an email guy, how many written communications did Roger Stone have with Randy Credico?'
Taylor replied: '72.'

Stone's lying under oath was massive and repetitive. His 7 convictions could have carried a 50 year sentence so the idea that the 7-9yr recommendation was egregiously harsh is bull****. But, instead of just waiting on the judge to rule, Dirtbag had to get into it and actually **** things up worse for Stone. And we all know he's going to pardon that PoS anyway so it's just Dirtbag's stupidity and big "mouth" at work again and again. People really have to be damaged to create a Cult of worship around a PoS like that.

 

[Paradoxical]

It beats a religion that upholds Donald Trump as a role model. I'll take the guy with a moral backbone over the huckster and his defenders any day of the week.

Of COURSE you would. He back stabbed the man that MSM has made all of you hate. The only question is. Why wouldn't you?

 

[Jay59]

You couldn't have broadcast your pathetic desperation any louder than that.

Back in the early 1970s, the not yet good Pittsburgh Steelers were getting kill by the Bears. One of the young players spit on Dick Butkus. Butkus only laughed, thumped his chest and said, "Who's All Pro?"

Want to spit again?

 

[iguanaman]

Your title is as stupid as it is lame. If the President wants to get someone off the hook for a crime all he has to do is pardon them.

And take the heat for it like a man. It's much easier for a coward like Trump to corrupt the entire justice system from within. Trumpists like you eat it up. You want Trump to be the law anyway.

He tweets about federal prosecutors' sentencing recommendation for his old friend, convicted felon Roger Stone, and the Justice Department, appearing to abandon its independence, files a memo calling for "far less" prison time instead. All four prosecutors quit the case, and two resigned from the US attorney's office in Washington, DC.

Trump boasts about a robust economy, but then summarily cuts the 2.5% pay raise slated for millions of federal employees down to 1%. He offers no justification beyond a simple declaration that "national emergency or serious economic conditions" necessitated the cut.
Days after he is acquitted in the Senate impeachment trial, Trump removes Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman — and his twin brother — from the National Security Council, in what can only be explained as an act of retaliation after Vindman answered a subpoena and testified in the House impeachment inquiry. Vindman's brother got the ax because, well, Trump could.
We should expect the President to crash through all the norms and traditions that create the foundation of Washington to demonstrate his personal power and fulfill his campaign promise "to win so much you are going to be so sick and tired of winning." But if you think Trump's "winning" will have something to do with the public good, think again.

Trump's twisted 'winning streak' (opinion) - CNN

 

[Moderate Right]

Roger Stone Requests New Trial Amid Presidential Meddling Scandal | Talking Points Memo

Just waiting to see if Barrfbag stomps into this one, too. He's already flung his feces into the Flynn trial twice.

LOL. The Senators in the impeachment trial were jurors and the left smeared all who refused to indict Trump. So, I guess you guys really don't give a damn about smearing jurors.

 

[goldkam]

The leftist lying media has been getting away the vilest of false accusations and misrepresentations directed against innocent Americans.

The media is not perfect and I don't dispute that. But you use the leftist labelling as means of categorising and segregating and it proves nothing. All it proves is this underlying level of hate and ferocity with an almost perfect duplication of Trumps rhetoric and quite frankly its wrong. Trump makes this into he said she said teenagers arguing at school level.

What examples are you referring to?

Trump is not soft spoken and is not tactful and uses offensive language but remains the perfect personality to stand in constant rebuke to the vile leftist media propaganda.

So you accept and support a President using offensive language?

What you call vile leftist media propaganda is nothing more than an accurate depiction of Trumps behaviour and his presidency entwined with the typical media hype and sensationalisation. Even more interestingly the personality that you say is required is the one who prompts the accurate reporting to occur. He triggers the media and him alone creates a good story for them, yet complains when the story is accurately reported because it doesn't suit him.

ITS THIS DOUBLE STANDARD AT ITS VERY BEST.

 

[JMR]

The Credico did not take the statements at face value. He doubled down and said he and Stone always battered like this.

You miss the obvious...Stone was tampering with a witness, whether he was really gonna kill a dog or not. That is a crime.

 

[JMR]

Of COURSE you would. He back stabbed the man that MSM has made all of you hate. The only question is. Why wouldn't you?

I had serious doubts about the character of Donald Trump way before MSM was discussing him. Back in the days when he used an alias to call into journalists to brag about his sexual conquests....John Barron was his alias... Also, he ran quite a few casinos into the ground, and was known to be a cheat and a liar. Then he really showed his true colors, becoming the king of the birthers.

Mitt Romney didn't back stab anyone. He evaluated the evidence and cast a vote. Trump is not entitled to his support. So, OF COURSE, you would not understand that. Why would you?

 

[marke]

The media is not perfect and I don't dispute that. But you use the leftist labelling as means of categorising and segregating and it proves nothing. All it proves is this underlying level of hate and ferocity with an almost perfect duplication of Trumps rhetoric and quite frankly its wrong. Trump makes this into he said she said teenagers arguing at school level.

What examples are you referring to?



So you accept and support a President using offensive language?

What you call vile leftist media propaganda is nothing more than an accurate depiction of Trumps behaviour and his presidency entwined with the typical media hype and sensationalisation. Even more interestingly the personality that you say is required is the one who prompts the accurate reporting to occur. He triggers the media and him alone creates a good story for them, yet complains when the story is accurately reported because it doesn't suit him.

ITS THIS DOUBLE STANDARD AT ITS VERY BEST.

Just because leftist democrats hate what Trump says does not make what he says hate speech. The left have a problem with real hate speech which has real disastrous and/or deadly consequences. Consider leftist democrat mobs marching down the streets of big cities calling for the innocent assassination of American police officers, or the violence of the leftist resistance mobs protesting the elected USA government. Trump does not advocate violence.

Liberal America has a political violence problem - Chicago Tribune

 

[CaughtInThe]

Mafia

 

[goldkam]

Just because leftist democrats hate what Trump says does not make what he says hate speech. The left have a problem with real hate speech which has real disastrous and/or deadly consequences. Consider leftist democrat mobs marching down the streets of big cities calling for the innocent assassination of American police officers, or the violence of the leftist resistance mobs protesting the elected USA government. Trump does not advocate violence.

Liberal America has a political violence problem - Chicago Tribune

It only took three words before you started labelling and attacking others....interestingly I never said anything about hate speech as well. That is a very different matter I don't necessarily believe Trump has crossed into yet.

Do you have some sort of obsession with the left....your are on a march of labelling, hating and attacking constantly with no constructive comments at all. The left have a problem with real hate speech and that is correct and rightly so......what about conservatives?

Their are extreme groups on both sides of politics your comments are based on this made up fantasy about what I am stating.

 

[snakestretcher]

The sun came up this morning. There, I've posted facts and you haven't.

No, the sun didn't "come up". The Earth orbited around it. There, that's a fact.

 

[digitusmedius]

LOL. The Senators in the impeachment trial were jurors and the left smeared all who refused to indict Trump. So, I guess you guys really don't give a damn about smearing jurors.

Senate Republican lackeys smeared themselves with cowardice and shame. All "the left" did was quote them.

 

[Excon]

Oh, he will certainly do that but Dirtbag's m.o. is to **** all over the justice system from start to finish in his plan to subjugate all of it to his will and power.

iLOL
Biased nonsense.

For a very large portion of the population - Stone has been mistreated. You can not convince them they are wrong becasue the evidence in toto allows for such an interpretation, just as it allows for that interpretation to be ignored.

Here's an idea. Instead of making grandiose claims like that why don't you give us a link to where this groundswell of Stone support comes from? We'd all love to see your source(s) for it.

Hilarious.

You honestly do not think the President's supporters don't believe Stone has been mistreated? Really?
Surrrrrrrrrrrrreeeeeeee? :rollseyes&slapsforehead:

No, but he's certainly the leading Dirtbag accomplice in the the rightwing media pukefunnel in Dirtbag's attempt to destroy our system of justice and make it his personal police force.

Stupidly biased nonsense.

---

And take the heat for it like a man. It's much easier for a coward like Trump to corrupt the entire justice system from within. Trumpists like you eat it up. You want Trump to be the law anyway.

[SUP]Trump's twisted 'winning streak' (opinion) - CNN[/SUP]

:2rofll:
Your reply is nothing but irrelevant nonsense.

 

[Excon]

Being tried and convicted by a jury of witness tampering and lying to investigators is now being "mistreated"?.

As I stated.
The evidence allows for such an interpretation.
You would understand that if you weren't biased.

Of course if you're Stone or a fan of corruption, you would naturally agree. Trump is both, as his woeful record shows

iLOL Doh!.
Your reply is noting but biased nonsense.