• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Donnie Dirtbag Smears a Juror To Get His Criminal Associates Off

digitusmedius said:
Here's what the Federal Rules of Evidence has to say on this subject:


The total time this jury deliberated was only 8 hours. To try to impugn that verdict would require that the foreperson had done A, B or C above. The Cult of Dirtbag is, as usual, grasping at straws.
Click to expand...

The predictable response is that the juror's prior behavior is the "extraneous prejudicial information," and that will be rejected due to the fact that said response is dumb as dirt.
 
Cardinal said:
The predictable response is that the juror's prior behavior is the "extraneous prejudicial information," and that will be rejected due to the fact that said response is dumb as dirt.
Click to expand...

A.k.a. BS on its BS face.
 
digitusmedius said:
All you have to do is prove she imposed her will on all the other jurors (who took just a couple of hours to reach their verdict) and/or introduced information during deliberations that was not part of the evidence given in the trial. Good luck.
Click to expand...

Would you defend her if she was discovered to be a racist?
 
digitusmedius said:
It might be possible that some day you could accidentally post something that's factual or true but I won't hold my breath.
Click to expand...
The sun came up this morning. There, I've posted facts and you haven't.
 
apdst said:
Would you defend her if she was discovered to be a racist?
Click to expand...

If her Facebook feed was filled with nothing but pictures of her in full Nazi regalia, it wouldn’t change the fact that if she behaved herself and followed the judge’s orders during trial, there wouldn’t be a mistrial.

And if she did appear in full Nazi regalia, then it would be up to one of the lawyers to remove her during void dire.
 
marke said:
Democrats are not ashamed to slander the President of the United States with the vilest of terminology for suggesting the existence of unjust bias in court proceedings against a targeted republican commentator.
Click to expand...

It is absolutely frightening that you believe what you just posted.
 
JMR said:
He probably will pardon Stone. First he has to throw up the giant fantasy that poor Roger has been mistreated. Then his followers will fall in line and demand that Roger be pardoned.
Click to expand...

Facts are a messy thing.
 
JMR said:
He probably will pardon Stone. First he has to throw up the giant fantasy that poor Roger has been mistreated. Then his followers will fall in line and demand that Roger be pardoned.
Click to expand...

The same God that Mitt adores is the Mormon one, invented by a huckster named Joseph Smith. Next!!!!
 
Paradoxical said:
The same God that Mitt adores is the Mormon one, invented by a huckster named Joseph Smith. Next!!!!
Click to expand...

Oh which religion are you claiming is real?
 
marke said:
Democrats are not ashamed to slander the President of the United States with the vilest of terminology
Click to expand...

Well I mean if you look at how the Presidents speaks and acts towards others there is zero respect, zero cooperativeness and zero integrity. The man has said some of the vilest things no other President has ever said, yet a double standard by those who support him is said. Everything wrongful, unethical or disrespectful he says is downplayed and ignored yet anything Democrats (or anyone against Trump for that matter) say is attacked with an over reactive response.
 
US&THEM said:
Oh which religion are you claiming is real?
Click to expand...

Mitt thinks his is. I wonder if he'll meet Jesus on another planet after he dies? Does he think those gold plates Joseph Smith found were whisked back to heaven? THIS is the "great" intellect we are dealing with in Mitt.
 
Paradoxical said:
Mitt thinks his is. I wonder if he'll meet Jesus on another planet after he dies? Does he think those gold plates Joseph Smith found were whisked back to heaven? THIS is the "great" intellect we are dealing with in Mitt.
Click to expand...

Oh so being a Mormon is different than being any other religion?
 
apdst said:
Would you defend her if she was discovered to be a racist?
Click to expand...

Will you publicly (i.e., on this forum) call out Dirtbag as a lying scumbag when we learn his attacks were just another unfounded smears he launches on anyone he considers his enemy?
 
marke said:
Democrats are not ashamed to slander the President of the United States with the vilest of terminology for suggesting the existence of unjust bias in court proceedings against a targeted republican commentator.
Click to expand...

It's not slander when all the charges are true. Dig a new dry hole.
 
JMR said:
Did McCabe threaten the life of a witness?

In these days of Trump lying doesn't seem to matter much.
Click to expand...

The witness who Stone "threatened", told the FBI he was in no way threatened, that was the way he and Stone talked.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom