Mach
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2006
- Messages
- 27,745
- Reaction score
- 24,087
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
Sounds productive. Sounds like they will actively, individually, seek out areas of the market that value their service. unemployed people, working hard, outrageous right? That you don't think it's reasonable is unsettling.The poor and jobless can just fight amongst each other to find someone who doesn't cut their own grass.
Also, I have to chuckle at the notion that the government "forces employment on employers" by...employing people with the money it taxes from employers.
It's the sort of thing that sounds like it would kind of make sense in your head...until you take three seconds to think about it and realize it's nonsense.
So you can't show why it's wrong, you just "disagree". That's no different than forfeiting the position, you do realize that? No really, describe what you mean and how it's NOT like what I wrote above. I will gladly accept your own words rather than the logical implication that we're left to conclude based on the little information you were brave enough to provide. I agree that it's nonsense for the voters that don't earn enough to actually pay their portion of the federals/state spending burden, it's only a minority that is largely bearing the burden of taxing so government can spend on XYZ.