- Joined
- Aug 26, 2012
- Messages
- 8,247
- Reaction score
- 2,713
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
It's not Joe's property or if it is he's renting it to Joe's Diner. Just check Joe's Diner's tax records. I'm betting the business's rent/mortgage payment as well as all it's utilities and many other things get deducted from it's income. Joe doesn't get to do that, only businesses get that privilege.
Joe's Diner is responsible for what Joe does when he's serving and cooking food, how clean the Diner's restroom is and many other aspects of Joe's Diner. As for "violent interference" I have no clue what you're talking about. The police aren't going to throw Joe in jail if that's what you mean but the jurisdiction could certainly fine Joe's Diner for noncompliance with business laws and could banish the business if it's illicit behavior calls for that extreme.
No person's property or person has been violated. No person's property has been taken. Business assets are a different subject.
Let's say Joe owns a piece of land. He builds a building on that land. He begins serving food to people who want to buy that food. It's all Joe.
Nobody has any justification for telling Joe who he must serve food to in his own diner on his own property.