Democrats refuse to believe Keith Ellison accuser

[HumblePi]

I see the jury is still out on Keith Ellison. Others like Ted Kennedy and JFK were just grandfathered in without consequences for sex sins. Bill Clinton got a pass from liberals wanting to put Bubba and his golly josh sexual missteps behind them.

And a man that admitted his own sexual proclivities for assaulting women got elected president despite outing himself on video. A man that bragged that his Vietnam was fighting STD's in the 70's. I'm pretty certain that if Bill Clinton's marital infidelities were known before his election he would still be working on a farm in Arkansas. And if you recall, Bill Clinton was impeached for lying under oath in the House if Representatives but didn't get the 2/3 majority in the Senate., so no....he didn't get a pass.

 

[eohrnberger]

Could be worse, imagine if we had a president that was a sexual predator.

We already have had one. Bill Clinton.

We still have one, Trump

Disputable.

Sexual predator
Obeying to the sole urge of discharging himself, the sexual predator erroneously thinks he can build self-confidence by having sex with unwilling girls
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Sexual predator

This definition certainly applies more so to Clinton than to Trump. There are at least 4 cases where women have accused Clinton of being unwilling in the act.

This doesn't speak to how badly and inappropriately Trump has treated women in the past (he has), or even presently (we don't know, no reports of such involving Melania Trump).

An accusation of being a sexual predator is such a loaded incendiary 'smear term' that it shouldn't be thrown around lightly. Unfortunately many do, along with nearly every other loaded incendiary 'smear term', such as racist, simply because there's a difference in people's politics.

It's time to put a moratorium on the word 'racist' | Reniqua Allen ...
[url]https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/nov/.../time-to-retire-the-word-raci...[/URL]
Nov 7, 2013 - Reniqua Allen: Racism has a specific definition. ... usage" of the word "racist" especially when used as an "accusation" or "smear word" because: ... but the constant use of such incendiary and dramatic language often takes us ...

I think this author has it right.

 

[marke]

This post right here is why people figured out you are racist. Both exist but to say that black racism is a bigger problem than white racism is incredibly stupid.

Just because ignorant people are misled to think blacks cannot be racist does not minimize the fact that the abundant evidence is irrefutable.

 

[marke]

And a man that admitted his own sexual proclivities for assaulting women got elected president despite outing himself on video. A man that bragged that his Vietnam was fighting STD's in the 70's. I'm pretty certain that if Bill Clinton's marital infidelities were known before his election he would still be working on a farm in Arkansas. And if you recall, Bill Clinton was impeached for lying under oath in the House if Representatives but didn't get the 2/3 majority in the Senate., so no....he didn't get a pass.

Bubba did not get a pass from republicans like he did from his wife and from other democrats.

 

[eohrnberger]

Bubba did not get a pass from republicans like he did from his wife and from other democrats.

So much so that as Clinton exited the impeachment hearing he got a standing ovation from other Dems.

 

[MAGAnificent]

Of course! The Democrats did the exact right thing with Al Franken, remember? And that involved a photo of him 'pretending' to be reaching for a woman asleep, he never touched her! Nevertheless, the Democrats had him out of office faster than the speed of light. See, the Democrats respect women, the Republican simply do not. So to answer your question as to whether or not Keith Ellison would be asked to resign if charges are proven true, you bet your ass they would.

When you make up half your story, the whole story is in doubt. The truth is that the democrats at first circled the wagons around Franken. Then when the heat of their hypocrisy became too much, they decided they would sacrifice Franken if it would help them get the Alabama seat, knowing that a democrat would be appointed to fill Franken's senate seat.

 

[MAGAnificent]

Could be worse, imagine if we had a president that was a sexual predator.

Does the name "Bill Clinton" ring a bell?

 

[MAGAnificent]

We still have one, Trump

Prove it.

 

[MAGAnificent]

I see the jury is still out on Keith Ellison. Others like Ted Kennedy and JFK were just grandfathered in without consequences for sex sins. Bill Clinton got a pass from liberals wanting to put Bubba and his golly josh sexual missteps behind them.

They even gave a pass to a former klansman who held the rank of "grand kleagle" and "exalted cyclops". As a matter of fact, Hillary Clinton claimed that he was her mentor. That would be democrat senator Robert "sheets" Byrd.

 

[HumblePi]

Prove it.

source: Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_sexual_misconduct_allegations

Another type of accusation was made, primarily after the audio recording surfaced, by several former Miss USA and Miss Teen USA contestants, who accused Trump of entering the dressing rooms of beauty pageant contestants. Trump, who owned the Miss Universe franchise, which includes both pageants, was accused of going into dressing rooms in 1997, 2000, 2001, and 2006, while contestants were in various stages of undress. During a 2005 interview on The Howard Stern Show, Trump said that he could "get away with things like that".

 

[MAGAnificent]

View attachment 67241017


View attachment 67241016

source: Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_sexual_misconduct_allegations

Another type of accusation was made, primarily after the audio recording surfaced, by several former Miss USA and Miss Teen USA contestants, who accused Trump of entering the dressing rooms of beauty pageant contestants. Trump, who owned the Miss Universe franchise, which includes both pageants, was accused of going into dressing rooms in 1997, 2000, 2001, and 2006, while contestants were in various stages of undress. During a 2005 interview on The Howard Stern Show, Trump said that he could "get away with things like that".

I'll say it again. Prove any sexual harassment by Trump whatsoever.

 

[HumblePi]

I'll say it again. Prove any sexual harassment by Trump whatsoever.

 

[wolfsgirl]

I assume you'd want your advice to apply to Ford as well: If Ford is unhappy with the Senate investigation, she can file a police report with the appropriate police jurisdiction - the Maryland Police.

But don't you feel that the DNC should be duty-bound to make a determination on Monahan's complaints? Do you feel they should sit on it forever, or do you feel they should issue their determination at some point?

The DNC has been investigating a little over a month. That's hardly forever. Monahan only made her allegation on facebook Aug 12th.

 

[veritas1]

It's not like this happened 36 years ago, It happened last month so they need to be sure Ellison isn't falsely accused.:lol:

 

[MAGAnificent]

View attachment 67241017


View attachment 67241016

source: Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_sexual_misconduct_allegations

Another type of accusation was made, primarily after the audio recording surfaced, by several former Miss USA and Miss Teen USA contestants, who accused Trump of entering the dressing rooms of beauty pageant contestants. Trump, who owned the Miss Universe franchise, which includes both pageants, was accused of going into dressing rooms in 1997, 2000, 2001, and 2006, while contestants were in various stages of undress. During a 2005 interview on The Howard Stern Show, Trump said that he could "get away with things like that".

Sorry. I don't consider wikipedia as a serious source, considering that the reader can edit the text. Howard Stern? Are you kidding?

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

 

[MAGAnificent]

View attachment 67241101

You do understand the difference between allegation and proof don't you? Get back to me when you are serious.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

 

[Spartacus FPV]

The Democrats don't care about victims, they care about power. They're sick of being losers.

 

[HumblePi]

Sorry. I don't consider wikipedia as a serious source, considering that the reader can edit the text. Howard Stern? Are you kidding?

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Just to give you some information regarding Wikipedia, editing is possible only on pages that are not protected. The information I linked to Wikipedia is a protected page and cannot be edited by anyone. The contributor sources are clearly noted on the bottom if you care to check them out. The 'lock' icon at the right hand of the title is an indication that this is a protected source.



[snip]Wikipedia is a wiki, meaning that anyone can edit any unprotected page and improve articles immediately for all readers. You do not need to register to do this. Anyone who has edited is known as a "Wikipedian" (commonly referred to as, simply, editors) and, no matter how trivial the edit may seem, can be proud that they have helped make Wikipedia what it is. All of these edits add up! Wikipedia uses two methods of editing: the new VisualEditor (VE), and classic editing through wiki markup (wikitext).

Some pages are protected from editing. These pages are denoted by a lock icon on the top right of the page and, if you are not allowed to edit the page, it will have a "View source" tab instead of an "Edit" tab. You can still edit these pages indirectly, by submitting an edit request—an editor with the ability to edit the protected page will respond to your request. You can submit a request by clicking on the "View source" tab on that page and using the "Submit an edit request" link at the bottom right. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Editing

As far as Howard Stern, it wasn't his claim about Trump's personal Vietnam, it came right from Trump himself.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=deA6MMXSjCg

 

[HumblePi]

You do understand the difference between allegation and proof don't you? Get back to me when you are serious.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

You're laughable and not worth my time. I'd rather discourse with someone with a logical mind, thanks anyway.

 

[MAGAnificent]

You're laughable and not worth my time. I'd rather discourse with someone with a logical mind, thanks anyway.

First, you must develop a logical mind yourself. And while your at it....maybe when you age a few years, you may be able to tell the difference between evidence,accusation, and locker room talk. Have a nice life.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

 

[MAGAnificent]

Just to give you some information regarding Wikipedia, editing is possible only on pages that are not protected. The information I linked to Wikipedia is a protected page and cannot be edited by anyone. The contributor sources are clearly noted on the bottom if you care to check them out. The 'lock' icon at the right hand of the title is an indication that this is a protected source.

View attachment 67241152

[snip]Wikipedia is a wiki, meaning that anyone can edit any unprotected page and improve articles immediately for all readers. You do not need to register to do this. Anyone who has edited is known as a "Wikipedian" (commonly referred to as, simply, editors) and, no matter how trivial the edit may seem, can be proud that they have helped make Wikipedia what it is. All of these edits add up! Wikipedia uses two methods of editing: the new VisualEditor (VE), and classic editing through wiki markup (wikitext).

Some pages are protected from editing. These pages are denoted by a lock icon on the top right of the page and, if you are not allowed to edit the page, it will have a "View source" tab instead of an "Edit" tab. You can still edit these pages indirectly, by submitting an edit request—an editor with the ability to edit the protected page will respond to your request. You can submit a request by clicking on the "View source" tab on that page and using the "Submit an edit request" link at the bottom right. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Editing

As far as Howard Stern, it wasn't his claim about Trump's personal Vietnam, it came right from Trump himself.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=deA6MMXSjCg

Like it or not, when it comes to politics, I just do not take wikipedia seriously as a source. It amounts to little more then a blog. If you care whether I take you seriously, just use grown up sources. If you do not care, I wish you well.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk