First, I researched and we do have background checks. I resent being called a liar for being incorrect.you are lying. we have national background checks and in the 24 years they have been in place and involve all licensed dealers (which is the only kind of sale that such checks can be enforced) there is NO evidence they have done anything to decrease violent crime
law enforcement agencies routinely gather than information so I have no idea what you are claiming.
So you're the real victim here. Gotcha.
Freedom has nothing to do with being able to own an ak-47.
No, not to inflict anything on their fellow citizens...to have the ability to protect themselves from the govt.
It's about freedom, and staying free. You can choose to sacrifice yours bit by bit. I prefer not.
See my signature, in blue.
You're against anyone examining any policy changes that might prevent mass shootings? Do you like mass shootings?
Also.... Why are you politicizing this? People are dying and you want to talk about one vague line in one tweet by one senator.
Government???...The founding fathers wanted to allow citizens to fight their own government?...What kind of logic is that?.....The shooter was de-ranged and insane...To allow him to legally and easily get these weapons is equally insane....
Sorry DemoRats but we already have gun control; The Second Amendment has already been infringed upon beyond belief ..........
I went to the Guns N Roses concert in Tel Aviv not long ago. They had many marksman units, and many more rifle equipped squads surrounding the entire venue. We should consider doing the same.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Thanks for explaining why I got quoted in that post and then couldn’t find your post. Mystery solved!
What makes you think that Obamacare provided for mental illness treatment whereas Trump’s plan did not? I don’t know that. How do you? No offense, but I never saw a,sensible point by point comparison.
I think it was the Reagan Adinistration that decimated the country’s mental health hospitals in this country. Not sure. I agree with you, though, that if we want mental health issues treated, we’ve got to provide the funds.
you're the one gleefully using the deaths of innocents to bait other posters knowing damn well that thing you do would have made not a difference. You just want to harass people who own guns
Sorry, but I've been hearing crap like that my whole life. In the 1960s, conservatives said 'passing Medicare would lead to doctors being told where to live and how much money they earn -- and we'd look back on the days when men were free.' That was BS then and the idea that unless we live like the wild-wild-west we can't be free, is BS now.No, not to inflict anything on their fellow citizens...to have the ability to protect themselves from the govt.
It's about freedom, and staying free. You can choose to sacrifice yours bit by bit. I prefer not.
See my signature, in blue.
Freedom has nothing to do with being able to own an ak-47.
You write in total ignorance now. Yes, the FF's absolutely wanted American citizens to be able to strike against their govt if it turned against them. THey were very clear on their use to fight back against govt tyranny.
Gun Control?.....Where?.....My guess the folks in Las Vegas and the families of those killed and wounded would beg to differ
I went to the Guns N Roses concert in Tel Aviv not long ago. They had many marksman units, and many more rifle equipped squads surrounding the entire venue. We should consider doing the same.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Sorry, but I've been hearing crap like that my whole life. In the 1960s, conservatives said 'passing Medicare would lead to doctors being told where to live and how much money they earn -- and we'd look back on the days when men were free.' That was BS then and the idea that unless we live like the wild-wild-west we can't be free, is BS now.
You are missing the point, either mistakenly or intentionally. This isn't about me personally. The idea that we waste lives -- such as school children, people attending a concert or going to a night club, should be abhorrent to all people. To answer the problem with shrugged shoulders is more abhorrent.
Ah no they were not...The wanted a citizen militia in place of a standing army to defend against an invasion.....No talk of fighting their own government...That was over 250 years....Hardly relevant to today....That logic won't make the families of the victims feel better
Sandy hook marked the end of the gun control debate. If a bunch of kids getting shot wasn't enough to enact change then nothing will be.
What makes you so sure they werent semi-auto?
Fully automatic weapons are illegal in the US. You can re-engineer them and make them fully auto...also illegal.
I doubt it was fully auto and am waiting to hear. Fully auto just adds to the highly emotional rhetoric.
The contention, if true, that the Las Vegas shooter used a full-auto firearm in his crime makes the act even more mind boggling than other tragic mass shootings. It means that the shooter somehow had access to extraordinarily rare and difficult-to-obtain weapons
What would propose that would have prevented this guy and the Sandy Hook killer?
No, let's allow silencers and armor piecing bullets and full-auto machine guns. There is a reason we call them gun nuts. And, that reason is obvious. They are nuts.