• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Democrats Have Always Called Republicans "Racists" and Other Vile Names

We know. You call everyone who disagrees with you racist.

That's such a ridiculous argument, I'm going to stop right there.

Unless you can provide proof?
 
The silence from GOP lawmakers is tacit support for Trump's racists remarks.

Actually, it's not. It's just them avoiding taking a stand based on their perception of political risk. The Dem lawmakers do the same thing.
 
LOL!!

Yeah. Right. I'm going to listen to a middle school when it tells me how to evaluate a website.

Your post demonstrated you lack the skills taught at that website.

Do you think that the middle school is part of a liberal conspiracy?

Now...give me an elementary school's take on how to recognize biased articles.

Generally teaching how to evaluate sources of information is taught in middle school. You obviously missed it, possibly because of age? Why not go back and learn something you are obviously ignorant about?
 
Last edited:
Before Donald Trump The Left Accused Conservatives of Being "racist," "homophobe," "sexist," "mean-spirited," "insensitive" and much more.

FDR was retroactively insinuating that Calvin Coolidge was a Nazi in 1944, and Walter Cronkite was doing the same to Barry Goldwater 20 years later. A lie repeated for three-quarters of a century...

When the Newt Gingrich-led Republicans wanted to cut taxes and pursue welfare reform in the mid-nineties, the New York Times excoriated Gingrich for his "race-based, anger-charged politics" and compared him to southern segregationist George Wallace.

Harlem's Democratic congressman Charles Rangel attacked Republican tax cuts as pure race hatred. "It's not 'spic' or 'nigger' anymore," Rangel growled. "They say, 'Let's cut taxes.' "

Speaking on ABC's This Week, feminist and high-paid Gore consultant Naomi Wolf casually accused George W. Bush's "advisors" by whom she meant City Journal's editors of being "racist." Wolf's evidence? The truthful observation that some members of the underclass, because of their dysfunctional worldview, ignore the economic opportunities blossoming all around them.

After the Republicans won the House in 1994 President Clinton said that "What [conservative Republicans] want to do," President Clinton said, "is make war on the kids of this country."

Left-leaning host Bryant Gumbel asked liberal children's advocate Marian Wright Edelman a classic leading question: "In light of the new welfare-reform bill, do you think the children need more prayers than ever before?"

Former Democratic New York governor Mario Cuomo evoked the image of "Republican storm-troopers."

Another New York Democrat, Congressman Major Owens, went further: "These are the people," he thundered, "who are practicing genocide with a smile: they're worse than Hitler."

A crazed nut-job attacked a practice of the congressional GOP baseball team. The hatred that drove 66-year-old James Hodgkinson to attempt a massacre of the Republican baseball team was that Republicans are sub-human haters. That hatred has been fermented by the Democratic Party...

Democrats have portrayed their Republican opposition as sub-human, narcissistic, greedy, rich, fat-cat, corporate chieftains and/or hillbilly, gun-toting, women-hating, religious fanatics, and racist xenophobes who hate Jews and want to reinstitute slavery.

Biden, speaking to a group of black supporters, told them that Republicans want to "put ya'll back in chains."

I could go on with examples like this all day.

This sort of rhetoric has not really changed since Pres. Trump was elected.

Instapundit >> Blog Archive >> FLASHBACK 2001: Before Donald Trump The Left Accused Conservatives of Being “racist,” “homophobe,” “…

Well, 'if the shoe fits...', etc. What size does Trump wear?
 
Your post demonstrated you lack the skills taught at that website.

Do you think that the middle school is part of a liberal conspiracy?



Generally teaching how to evaluate sources of information is taught in middle school. You obviously missed it, possibly because of age? Why not go back and learn something you are obviously ignorant about?

I already pointed out why that one link you presented is BS. I don't have problems recognizing biased nonsense when I see it.

Perhaps you should graduate from middle school, eh?
 
That's such a ridiculous argument, I'm going to stop right there.

Unless you can provide proof?

You meaning Liberals you your claim, We call racists racists.
 
Last edited:
Actually, today, it has nothing to do with party. We call racists racists. Honestly, it's not that difficult. For example, when someone is the leader of the racist Birther Movement, then they are a racist. And we will call them racists, because that's what they are.

The reason it so often seems to be aimed at Republicans? Perhaps you are ignorant of some American history, so let me help you. This:

Southern strategy - Wikipedia

has led to virtually all the racists being gathered under the Republican banner. Take the time to learn about your own history, a Canadian shouldn't have to explain it to you.

I think it is enjoyable watching you call Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi racists. Guess that means if Biden wins the nomination, you won't be supporting him because surely you wouldn't support a racist, would you?
 
That's such a ridiculous argument, I'm going to stop right there.

Unless you can provide proof?

I did notice you decided not to answer the question about being a racist for asking for tax returns over Obamas birth certificate.
 
Nobody wants to admit that they are a knuckle-dragger. It's easier to blame the messenger than to actually admit that they are garbage.

It is your opinion the birther movement was racist. Maybe it was, maybe it wasn't. Just because the intended target of something is black, or whatever, doesn't mean it was racism.
 
It's a documented fact that Trump was the leader of the racist Birther Movement:

Donald Trump Clung to ‘Birther’ Lie for Years, and Still Isn’t Apologetic - The New York Times

Trump is still reportedly pushing his racist “birther” conspiracy theory about Obama - Vox

Le phénomène Trump et la racialisation de la politique américaine
(translation)
Trump’s popularity is the outcome of the Republican Party’s longtime “Southern Strategy” that goes back to Nixon if not earlier, a coded appeal to white race prejudice and bigotry.6 The new White House incumbent is decidedly the GOP’s creature and the latest symptom of its crisis, a demagogue whose outspokenness made him the hero and mouthpiece of white nationalism and helped it morph into open militancy. There is grim irony in the fact that America’s first black President was “followed by the untitled leader of the Birther movement, a candidate slow to disavow support from the Ku Klux Klan7 and happy to receive the backing of white nationalists […]”; in that sense “Donald Trump can easily be portrayed as a personal repudiation and also proof of racial regression”.8

They've provided all the links to reputable sources to support those statements. If you disagree, let me know which sources you disagree with and why.

LOL. It was Hillary's campaign that was the birth of the birther movement.
 
It is your opinion the birther movement was racist. Maybe it was, maybe it wasn't. Just because the intended target of something is black, or whatever, doesn't mean it was racism.

Sure it does, Haven't you heard? The fraud squad told us so. You can't reprimand them because they are women of color. Just ask San Fran Nan. You didn't hear, shes now a racist as well.
 
LOL!!

Yeah. Right. I'm going to listen to a middle school when it tells me how to evaluate a website.

Now...give me an elementary school's take on how to recognize biased articles.

That was about the lamest excuse I have ever seen in trying to prove a point. Can't believe they even posted that with a straight face.
 
Oh yes...it DID change since Trump was elected...they ramped it up about 1000%.
Dems are keenly aware of two wrongs making a (W)right...however the wrong that may be perceived.
 
Actually, today, it has nothing to do with party. We call racists racists.

You sure do. Now that Liberals have determined that Pelosi is a racist, we are awaiting the next Liberal to be called out.
 
I guess that means the silence on the left of David Dukes endorsement of Dem candidate Tulsi Gabbard makes them all racist as well.

I didn't realize it worked that way, thanks for getting me up to speed on that.

Former KKK Leader David Duke Endorses Tulsi Gabbard 2020 Presidential Campaign, Says She'll Put American Interests Over Israel
Meh. The dems hate Gabbard for other reasons. Like she was a member of the military but doesn't wish America to engage in countless military skirmishes with other countries...Dems be HAWKS...Russia. Any country in middle and S. America. Iran. The middle east....Dems be HAWKS.

They wanna push that national debt higher and higher.
 
I guess that means the silence on the left of David Dukes endorsement of Dem candidate Tulsi Gabbard makes them all racist as well.

I didn't realize it worked that way, thanks for getting me up to speed on that.

Former KKK Leader David Duke Endorses Tulsi Gabbard 2020 Presidential Campaign, Says She'll Put American Interests Over Israel

I think very few Americans give a **** what Dukes thinks or says. I know I don't. His statement simply means that he does not agree with our policies towards Israel. He isn't alone in that. The ignorance comes from those who think that disapproval of Israeli policies is anti-Semitism. It isn't.

My point is throughout recorded human history, silence in the face of obvious racism or other types of hate towards a specific group has always been tacit approval of resulting atrocities. Speaking out against hatred takes courage. Silence about something you know is wrong is cowardly, which is what most congressional Republicans are currently displaying.
 
I think very few Americans give a **** what Dukes thinks or says. I know I don't. His statement simply means that he does not agree with our policies towards Israel. He isn't alone in that. The ignorance comes from those who think that disapproval of Israeli policies is anti-Semitism. It isn't.

My point is throughout recorded human history, silence in the face of obvious racism or other types of hate towards a specific group has always been tacit approval of resulting atrocities. Speaking out against hatred takes courage. Silence about something you know is wrong is cowardly, which is what most congressional Republicans are currently displaying.

So the silence from Republicans has always been tacit approval of racism but the silence from Democrats isn't because nobody cares what a real racist who approves of Dems thinks or says.

Naturally convenient or just a double standard?

Weren't Democrats all up in arms screaming Trump was a racist when Trump didn't denounce Duke fast enough?
 
It is your opinion the birther movement was racist. Maybe it was, maybe it wasn't. Just because the intended target of something is black, or whatever, doesn't mean it was racism.

So tell me why the 4 women were singled out to be "sent back to where they came from," even though they were either born, or naturalized here?

If it's not race-based, what is it?
 
So tell me why the 4 women were singled out to be "sent back to where they came from," even though they were either born, or naturalized here?

If it's not race-based, what is it?

I think it's anti-American.
 
Back
Top Bottom