Dear Boys: We Hate You

[marke]

So you're more of the Richard Spencer type, clean cut and not outwardly demonstrative of your sick and twisted beliefs. You hide in plain sight, waiting for the moment when you can finally strike a bold blow in the defense of your white supremacist Christian Identity.
Yes, I understand.

TICK TOCK, TICK TOCK...

View attachment 67247170

The trouble with leftist fools is that they think they can speak evil of any good person they want to by simply suggesting those good people are secretly wicked barbarians just waiting to do something terribly evil even though nobody with good sense has ever seen any indication of that whatsoever.

 

[marke]

I think he's got you right on the money.

Do you think I am a "Klan loving skinhead" also? What kind of psychological disfunction causes someone to come up with such stupidity?

 

[Hawkeye10]

The trouble with leftist fools is that they think they can speak evil of any good person they want to by simply suggesting those good people are secretly wicked barbarians just waiting to do something terribly evil even though nobody with good sense has ever seen any indication of that whatsoever.

Fantasizing about other peoples motives is a very harmful ignorant and time consuming pastime.

 

[marke]

They all became Republicans after the Nixon Southern Strategy.
To paraphrase Lyndon Johnson on the day he signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964:

"We've lost the South for a generation."

Unlike most democrats and too many republicans, I am not a party guy who supports whatever position the party promotes, whether wise or stupid. I am a Christian and God is my guide, not politicians, especially barbarians who hate God because they love sin.

Indeed, it appears we lost it for all eternity but if one looks back, the South has been a lost cause for 160 some odd years, and we only had the South as long as other Democrats in the East, West and North looked the other way. That became impossible finally, and that's when your ilk abandoned the Democratic Party, as any student of real history already knows.

You say I abandoned the democrat party. That is not true. I was never a democrat party mob supporter even though I may have voted for a democrat or two over the last 40 years.

I can't help it that you're so young and ignorant that you were taught weapons grade historical revisionism that depends on amnesia regarding the events of the Civil Rights movement.

You need to reexamine your thought processes. You call me young and yet claim I abandoned the democrat party during Nixon's day. Have you ever studied logic in school?

Yes indeed, in the 1860's the Democrats WERE the conservative racist party and the Republicans WERE the liberal party, the party of Lincoln.

I admire Lincoln. No matter who stood against him or what sort of names or labels his enemies put on him he still stood for emancipation of the slaves and for honoring God. Good man. Good republican.

But as anyone who observes history knows, political parties undergo drastic shifts in ideology all the time, often several times over several generations.

True. One year Hillary and dozens of other democrats were for going to war with Iraq and the next year they were with one mouth condemning Bush for doing so.

The key to all of this is that people recognize the fact that liberalism requires an open mind with regard to matters of race, creed and color, and thus demands the courage to BE "liberal" in the acceptance and tolerance of our differences, whereas conservatism teaches fear of the new and different with regard to same.

I suppose the reason Obama and Hillary did not respect God was because God is not as tolerant towards sin and wickedness as they thought He should be.

Your god is still the god of the burning cross and the lynch mob, the god of the Third Reich and the god of white supremacy no matter what party happens to embrace it.
And you are now exposed for all to see. Sunshine is the best disinfectant.

The Creator God of the universe is for judging wickedness and casting willful rebels against God into hell where they belong.

 

[marke]

It very well could be.
Doesn't change the fact that you believe in everything that they believe, as evidenced by the sources you quote in your arguments.

American Renaissance Magazine


American Renaissance
Editor: Jared Taylor
Website amren.com

American Renaissance (AR or AmRen) is a monthly white supremacist online publication founded and edited by Jared Taylor.
It is published by the New Century Foundation, which describes itself as a "race-realist, white advocacy organization".

Jared Taylor is a former member of the advisory board of The Occidental Quarterly and a former director of the National Policy Institute, a Virginia-based white nationalist think tank. He is also a board member and spokesperson of the Council of Conservative Citizens.

You can run, but you can't hide, boy.

I don't support moronic racist white mobs any more than I support moronic racist black mobs.

 

[marke]

Perhaps not, but southern racist morons sure do profess to love your god.

So? Black racist morons also claim to love the same God.

 

[CLAX1911]

Do you think I am a "Klan loving skinhead" also?

not in the strictest sense.
You do seem to share a cult-like irrational animosity toward homosexuals. And it seems to be equally based on bigotry in misconception.

So metaphorically yes

What kind of psychological disfunction causes someone to come up with such stupidity?

Ironic.

I would ask what kind of psychological dysfunction causes someone to come up with such stupidity as to think that all homosexuals are pedophiles.

suggesting you have some irrational hatred in your heart based on the profoundly stupid things you said here is not as big of a stretch is you saying everyone you don't like is a child molester.

 

[CLAX1911]

I don't support moronic racist white mobs any more than I support moronic racist black mobs.

The parallels aren't with the characteristic you hate put the heating of a characteristic.

 

[Checkerboard Strangler]

The trouble with leftist fools is that they think they can speak evil of any good person they want to by simply suggesting those good people are secretly wicked barbarians just waiting to do something terribly evil even though nobody with good sense has ever seen any indication of that whatsoever.

Speaking evil of any good person? The problem with that is, (A) I am not a "leftist" and have no affiliation with communism or marxism, (B) I'm feeding your own references to you, stuff YOU posted, therefore it's the actual TRUTH and not "evil", and you're scared to admit it, which means you lack the guts to stand behind it when it's exposed, (C) you're not a "good person", you're a white supremacist, and (D) most people who believe the stuff you believe wind up committing acts of barbarism, and wind up facing the consequences.

Of course, it could be that so far the only thing you've ever done is scrawl big swastikas on the front door of some old Jewish lady, or spray paint "NIGGER" on the home of a black family.

In which case, you're just an IMPOTENT white supremacist with dreams of grandeur, hence the reason you wind up here at Debate Politics. You feel that this is your cause celebre', your bully pulpit, where you can filibuster all day long.
You'd like to do more, but you can't muster up the courage. You don't have the stomach for it.

 

[Hawkeye10]

I started to see modern feminism back 1984-1985 as I lived with a gaggle of self professed radical dyke feminists at the Hedrick House co-op at Michigan State University. They liked me enough to invite me to hang out with them at the gay bars where they often met up with the fellow radical dyke feminsts, many of whom lived at the other housing co-ops. I was a liberal then you see, a self professed feminist with a somewhat radical bent myself as I was getting deep into Zen at that point which was a ****ing radical thing to do in 1984.... anyways one of the feminists I lived with took a real interest in me, we had a thing were we would go together to listen to folk music artists, her girlfriend who also lived in the house did not like that sort of thing plus she was a Vet student and had time issues because that was a demanding field of study. What I am telling you is that I was on the inside way back then, I know damn well what I am talking about, I listened as they talked amoungst themselves on where they wanted feminism to go, I listened to how much hate they had for men generally....and then over the years I watched feminism go exactly in the direction they had wanted to go. By the early 90's the radical dyke contingent of the feminist movement had won, the conservatives and all other non-conformist to their ideology were driven out.

I just reread this and it occurred to me that I forgot the bottom line that these people believed in, and that became the bottom line of feminism during the early 90's:

Men are evil, taking men down requires war, and the ends justify the means so dont worry much about honesty or anything else related to civil behavior.

 

[Checkerboard Strangler]

It's awful....but....my first reaction was, that that is a fantastic photograph...

Oh of course it is, it's striking. Evil can photograph well just as good can, photography is just a lens and light.

 

[Checkerboard Strangler]

Unlike most democrats and too many republicans, I am not a party guy who supports whatever position the party promotes, whether wise or stupid. I am a Christian and God is my guide, not politicians, especially barbarians who hate God because they love sin.

You already exposed what you really are, now you're trying to paper it over with hogwash.
It isn't working.

 

[Checkerboard Strangler]

I don't support moronic racist white mobs any more than I support moronic racist black mobs.

Yes you do. American Renaissance.

 

[Checkerboard Strangler]

I just reread this and it occurred to me that I forgot the bottom line that these people believed in, and that became the bottom line of feminism during the early 90's:

I don't think they were listening to your made-up homilies.

 

[notquiteright]

I would have said that happened to generation after the Civil Rights act. Further a racist Nation would have never tolerated president from the wrong race. I don't know why you're posting this to me I have not made one complained at all about women. Just feminists. Feminists are misogynistic. once again never said anything about women so making a strawman is not an argument. I'm sorry it's over. Fewer women currently identify as feminists than ever since the movement began. And let's look at this stupid s*** they complain about. Manspreading micro aggression Laura croft's ass in tomb raider. And then there are the morbidly obese women that want everyone to think that they're healthy. There is always the wage Gap myth as well. Yeah when you start making up nonsense to rage Against your movements over.

LMAO, I'm not the one raging, the OP was raging, try to focus on who says what...

Now who is making strawmen... never said the entire nation was racist but those who claim racism is over in America because we elected a black President are wrong.

Can I make such derogatory blanket statements about all who stand for gay rights??? There is more than one type of feminist- so few are misogynistic that even trying to make the blanket statement is rather ignorant.

You can be sorry all you want, but 'it' isn't over as long as men think they can pass laws restricting women's rights to their own bodies, some putz geek can post who bad women are in the IT field....

That you and a few others try and use the 'worst' of a group to define the entire group is the same type of bigotry that racists use...

That ain't a strawman.... eace

 

[marke]

not in the strictest sense.
You do seem to share a cult-like irrational animosity toward homosexuals. And it seems to be equally based on bigotry in misconception.

So metaphorically yes


Ironic.

I would ask what kind of psychological dysfunction causes someone to come up with such stupidity as to think that all homosexuals are pedophiles.

suggesting you have some irrational hatred in your heart based on the profoundly stupid things you said here is not as big of a stretch is you saying everyone you don't like is a child molester.

Homosexuality is sexual perversion and immorality. It is like drunkenness in that it does damage to the moral fabric and stability of people and civilizations.

 

[marke]

Speaking evil of any good person? The problem with that is, (A) I am not a "leftist" and have no affiliation with communism or marxism, (B) I'm feeding your own references to you, stuff YOU posted, therefore it's the actual TRUTH and not "evil", and you're scared to admit it, which means you lack the guts to stand behind it when it's exposed, (C) you're not a "good person", you're a white supremacist, and (D) most people who believe the stuff you believe wind up committing acts of barbarism, and wind up facing the consequences.

Of course, it could be that so far the only thing you've ever done is scrawl big swastikas on the front door of some old Jewish lady, or spray paint "NIGGER" on the home of a black family.

In which case, you're just an IMPOTENT white supremacist with dreams of grandeur, hence the reason you wind up here at Debate Politics. You feel that this is your cause celebre', your bully pulpit, where you can filibuster all day long.
You'd like to do more, but you can't muster up the courage. You don't have the stomach for it.

It takes little more effort for you to call me a white supremacist than it does for me to call you a black racist agitator who hates whites and Christians. Is either accusation true? Who knows? No proof has been given as far as I know.

 

[Bodi]

If you'd like to tell me how I'm wrong and the 3 things mentioned in the OP are in fact feminists' fault, then go ahead and we can talk about it in a civil manner. Until then I will mock him for saying something that stupid then being cowardly enough to refuse to defend or explain it.

I was just trying to help you out...

 

[Bodi]

Look at it like a pendulum. The pendulum has been far over to one side for a long long time.

Now it's swinging back, and perhaps it overshoots the mark a bit. That's what we would expect, not that the pendulum is going to stop perfectly at dead center.

I understand... but modern day man hating femi-Nazis are not concerned with balance... I have met many that think men are a plague...

 

[Hawkeye10]

I understand... but modern day man hating femi-Nazis are not concerned with balance... I have met many that think men are a plague...

A problem to be managed by women at best......

 

[CLAX1911]

LMAO, I'm not the one raging, the OP was raging, try to focus on who says what...

You weren't responding to the op you were responding to me. If you want to bitch about the op I'm not interested.

Now who is making strawmen... never said the entire nation was racist but those who claim racism is over in America because we elected a black President are wrong.

You still are the only one making a strawman. I don't deny there are about 5000 inbred idiots scattered around the country that don't like black people. They don't equate to anything.

Can I make such derogatory blanket statements about all who stand for gay rights???

No, but than again that isn't the equivalent. Gay people have equal rights, and believing that is right is not equivalent to feminism.

Feminism first assumes there is a patriarchy. That belittles and nullifies women's accomplishments. Therefore it is misogynistic.

There is more than one type of feminist- so few are misogynistic that even trying to make the blanket statement is rather ignorant.

If they are fighting a phantom patriarchy they fit the description. If they aren't than they aren't feminists. Patriarchy is it's only foe.

You can be sorry all you want, but 'it' isn't over as long as men think they can pass laws restricting women's rights to their own bodies, some putz geek can post who bad women are in the IT field....

No such laws are being passed.

It's over.

That you and a few others try and use the 'worst' of a group to define the entire group is the same type of bigotry that racists use...

I wasn't using the few, I was using the entirety of modern feminists. See above.

That ain't a strawman.... eace

You misrepresented my argument and attacked your misrepresentation. That's a strawman fallacy.

 

[Lursa]

That may be, but it is impressive that Machismo is so strong in Latin America that it even survives full-blown Communism. In the times I have been to Cuba, not even once was there an anti-male message. A slum that is free of feminism is better than a mansion with a feminist in it.

Of course weak men that need to feel superior and cannot compete with women on a level playing field would feel that way, love the message and the advantages.

 

[Lursa]

For the record my life is fabulous....I have had so much time with my kids and so much time to follow my curiosity and I been exposed to wisdom that almost no one anymore ever gets exposed to......and it is lovely having a sex slave for a wife and to be in demand in the BDSM swinger scene....even as the erotic pleasure have dried up for so many we Alpha Males who have figured out how to read and please women tend to get more Fun Time than we can handle sometimes....we have access to the best women.....they come and find us.

Then there is all of the awesome eating and drinking and weed as I spend my days having fun which include learning as my wife works....which was the deal we had back in 1985.....because we both by then had some sense of who we were......and I picked my woman well which is one of the most important things a guy can do to have a fabulous life.

I make no apologizes for being good at life.

So you try to use a ludicrous and incredibly narcissistic level of braggadocio (and not everyone will uh, be impressed, believe me) instead of continueing the argument? :doh

How deeply disturbed did the posts challenging you to support your words bother you?

 

[Lursa]

I am really good at something, at least you can figure that much out......it is the what that has you flummoxed.

Facts not in evidence sir, not since Dec 2015 anyway.

 

[CLAX1911]

Homosexuality is sexual perversion and immorality.

That is an opinion, one you can hold and not be the equivalent of a Klan member.

Not liking something, which is all you are stating, is acceptable. But being obstinate to people with different opinions than yours is the very definition of bigotry.

It is like drunkenness in that it does damage to the moral fabric and stability of people and civilizations.

You'll have to explain how keeping in mind that perversion and immorality, also known as you simply not liking it, is irrelevant.