• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

David Kellery. The latest patsy

John Prewett said:
View attachment 67224641
Click to expand...

I, for one, don't understand your post and from what I've seen this morning that doesn't look much like the Devin Kelley they've been showing on TV
th
. And I believe it's "Devin Kelley".
 
Wow, the conspiracy theorists took a full 12 hours before they began their utter nonsense.
 
beefheart said:
Wow, the conspiracy theorists took a full 12 hours before they began their utter nonsense.
Click to expand...

Gun lovers have been at it from the get-go. He's DD so banned from owning a gun (not true) he's an atheist (???) He's antifa (not true) He's mentally ill (standard denial mode) the disinformation and distraction list goes on.
 
Manc Skipper said:
Gun lovers have been at it from the get-go. He's DD so banned from owning a gun (not true) he's an atheist (???) He's antifa (not true) He's mentally ill (standard denial mode) the disinformation and distraction list goes on.
Click to expand...

The sheriff said the following:
As investigators try to determine a motive, they are also probing how the attacker obtained his gun. Kelley had sought a license to carry a gun in Texas but was rejected, Abbott said.

“By all of the facts that we seem to know, he was not supposed to have access to a gun, so how did this happen?” Abbott said in an interview on CNN. “We are in search of answers to these questions.”
Click to expand...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ing-spans-generations/?utm_term=.23990ab6bd68

So, it appears that he was not in legal possession of the weapon.
 
Manc Skipper said:
Gun lovers have been at it from the get-go. He's DD so banned from owning a gun (not true) he's an atheist (???) He's antifa (not true) He's mentally ill (standard denial mode) the disinformation and distraction list goes on.
Click to expand...

HowardBThiname said:
The sheriff said the following:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ing-spans-generations/?utm_term=.23990ab6bd68

So, it appears that he was not in legal possession of the weapon.
Click to expand...

(d) It shall be unlawful for any person to sell or otherwise dispose of any firearm or ammunition to any person knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that such person—
...
(6) who [2] has been discharged from the Armed Forces under dishonorable conditions

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/922

So it looks as though if he really was dishonorably discharged then he shouldn't have had a gun.
 
bubbabgone said:
(d) It shall be unlawful for any person to sell or otherwise dispose of any firearm or ammunition to any person knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that such person—
...
(6) who [2] has been discharged from the Armed Forces under dishonorable conditions

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/922

So it looks as though if he really was dishonorably discharged then he shouldn't have had a gun.
Click to expand...

He got the Big Chicken Dinner, not the Duck Dinner, so there was no restriction on gun ownership. (Bad Conduct Discharge)
 
Manc Skipper said:
He got the Big Chicken Dinner, not the Duck Dinner, so there was no restriction on gun ownership. (Bad Conduct Discharge)
Click to expand...

Yes, but the BCD was for a felony conviction for abuse, so he wasn't permitted to own a fire arm anyway.
 
Manc Skipper said:
He got the Big Chicken Dinner, not the Duck Dinner, so there was no restriction on gun ownership. (Bad Conduct Discharge)
Click to expand...

How about ...

(8) is subject to a court order that restrains such person from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner of such person or child of such intimate partner or person, or engaging in other conduct that would place an intimate partner in reasonable fear of bodily injury to the partner or child, except that this paragraph shall only apply to a court order that—...


"In 2012, he was court-martialed after being accused of assaulting his spouse and child, spokeswoman Ann Stefanek said."
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nat...kelley-court-martialed-2012-article-1.3613635

Was there a civilian court order? I couldn't find evidence of one but it would be reasonable that there would be.
 
To a conspiracy theoprist everything is a conspiracy
 
Fletch said:
You clearly have a secret reason for misspelling that....
Click to expand...

Maybe, maybe not. Ill have to ask the Space Vamps what my answer should be
 
Amazing how many people are so slow they still automatically almost always believe the Mockingbird Stream Media narrative, no matter how implausible it is
 
John Prewett said:
Amazing how many people are so slow they still automatically almost always believe the Mockingbird Stream Media narrative, no matter how implausible it is
Click to expand...

I've never seen MSM or whatever it's called.
 
John Prewett said:
Amazing how many people are so slow they still automatically almost always believe the Mockingbird Stream Media narrative, no matter how implausible it is
Click to expand...

Implausibilities happen every minute of every day. Little is predictable, very little turns out as planned, the unexpected is the rule, not the exception. So inventing a CT on a base of the improbable is a mistake.
 
John Prewett said:
Amazing how many people are so slow they still automatically almost always believe the Mockingbird Stream Media narrative, no matter how implausible it is
Click to expand...

You couldn't even spell the guy's name right, nor offer any links or any scintilla of any proof. Yeah, that is why no one takes conspiracy theorists seriously.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom