Continued from above, SPOILERS AHEAD
Someone mentioned another dumb behavior in one of the IMDB reviews. The main character is in hiding from his former FARC guerrilla boss Anibal, who is trying to find him to murder him as a traitor. He is hiding in Bogota with his son and his mother (the guerrilla boss said he will kill him and his whole family). So the bad guys find him and the guerrilla boss sends two assassins after him. He manages to kill one and disable the other, refrains from killing the other, letting the other go and saying "I'm letting you go so that you tell Anibal that I'm prepared for him." The guy runs away, he goes inside the home and keeps looking at the street from the window; doesn't immediately say anything to his mother and son, but eventually like a couple of days later, moves away with them to another hide out, not before leaving the two of them alone to go talk to his handler about relocating.
First of all, why in the hell should he let the second assassin go, to give Anibal this kind of message that you're a tough guy? Killing both assassins would already be the message, no? Second, your biggest concern is to hide your family from the bad guys, but you let the second assassin go warn Anibal, who might them immediately send ten assassins to the same location. Sure, you watch from a window... but you might not be able to stop all ten and you are actually unarmed (even if like I say below he is good at killing people with his bare hands, he wouldn't be able to do it to too many armed bad guys). And you leave your family behind, at the exact same location Anibal already knows of, to go negotiate with your handler, while in that interval Anibal could easily come in and kill your mother and son??? Any rational person would kill both assassins and immediately get your mother and son out of there.
Oh, not to mention another hugely dumb behavior. Truly dumb, this one. When the incident above happens, he doesn't have a gun. Well, he disarms one of the assassins, and actually uses the assassin's gun to kill the other one. But then he throws away the gun. Next when he goes see his handler, he begs for a gun. How in the hell didn't he keep the assassin's gun at least temporarily, while he was looking through the window to see if more assassins were coming? How would he defend his mother and son with an empty hand? Well, maybe he didn't want to keep a gun that had his fingerprints and the ballistics would identify it as shooting the bullet that killed the second assassin, but what good would this prevention do to him, if Anibal sent 10 more people and the gun-less character ended up dead, with his mother and son equally dead? At the very least, he'd keep that gun temporarily until his handler gave him another one, and THEN would toss it away.
And look at this: his handler enlists him as the infiltrated agent, but refuses to give him a gun (supposedly due to his previous past as a guerrilla guy, might turn the gun against the handler?). But he is a big strong man and the handler is a tiny woman. The first time they meet, when she first tries to recruit him and he refuses, he jumps her and easily dominates her and slams her head on a table. He is skilled at killing people both when he is armed and unarmed. So later when he changes his mind and accepts her offer of recruitment, he meets her in deserted back allies several times to relay his findings from infiltrating the gang. Well, if he wanted to kill her, he could have done so, unarmed, anytime in one of those encounters in the back alley. He is seen strangling strong men to death, why couldn't he simply strangle her too, if he wanted to kill her? Therefore, it makes no sense whatsoever to deny him a gun because she is afraid of him, but then, go meet this trained assassin twice her size, in deserted back alleys.
So, she sends him into dangerous situations, gun-less??? Into situations where everybody else has guns, but him? She seems to think that he is a very valuable asset to the law enforcement agency, and sends him to dangerous assignments, but denies him a weapon, based on what? That he might kill her? Well, he had dozens of opportunities to kill her, gun or not, and didn't.
So, I'm not usually a big nitpicker, but these blunders are killing this show for me. So far, I'll give it a 4 out of 10, and the 4 is more for the visuals and the the good actors and pretty actresses than for the plot.
You start cheering for the villain because the heroes are so stupid.
