• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Current Attempts to destroy Gun rights in Congress

the fright wing doesn't understand the Constitution

in no small part due to reading limitations

I am not right-wing

Majority of leftists want the document changed
 
it is not yet 2021, when progressives control the congress and the white house

then those scared ******s will have to eat ****
:lamo

Look at you. You have finally become just another bitter angry hate filled anti-gun leftist, with all your "gun owners are ******s!" rhetoric. What a tough little man you have become!

:lamo

Just remember...if they ever do pass a ban or confiscation YOU should be leading the charge to take the guns...k?
 
:lamo

Look at you. You have finally become just another bitter angry hate filled anti-gun leftist, with all your "gun owners are ******s!" rhetoric. What a tough little man you have become!

:lamo
absurd. have been a gun owner since i was 9 years young (.410), 58+ years

Just remember...if they ever do pass a ban or confiscation YOU should be leading the charge to take the guns...k?
NO confiscation from homes will be needed
they are not a menace to the public if they remain in the home

on the street. surrender it or be willing to pull its trigger to try to hold on to it (if it's on the list turtledude laughed at)

and yea, people who parade around showing off their weapons are ******s
 
absurd. have been a gun owner since i was 9 years young (.410), 58+ years


NO confiscation from homes will be needed
they are not a menace to the public if they remain in the home

on the street. surrender it or be willing to pull its trigger to try to hold on to it (if it's on the list turtledude laughed at)

and yea, people who parade around showing off their weapons are ******s
:lamo

I love it.

You are no different than every other leftist gun owner Ive ever seen. Look at you..stomping your feet like a BIG boy..."I'm a GUN OWNER dangit!!!"

But you are going to be leading the parade when the rats in congress push legislation banning guns. You will be cheering them on. "TAKE those guns from those gun rubber ******S!!! Yeah!! Thats right!!! I said ******S!!!! Hey guys...did you see that? I called them ******S!!! I'm just LIKE you...don't you love me? I'm YOUR kind of gun owner...right?"

Absurd? No...Bubba...they COUNT on people like you. They NEED you. And you will be right there for them.
 
:lamo

I love it.

You are no different than every other leftist gun owner Ive ever seen. Look at you..stomping your feet like a BIG boy..."I'm a GUN OWNER dangit!!!"

But you are going to be leading the parade when the rats in congress push legislation banning guns. You will be cheering them on. "TAKE those guns from those gun rubber ******S!!! Yeah!! Thats right!!! I said ******S!!!! Hey guys...did you see that? I called them ******S!!! I'm just LIKE you...don't you love me? I'm YOUR kind of gun owner...right?"

Absurd? No...Bubba...they COUNT on people like you. They NEED you. And you will be right there for them.

if that is what it takes to make our kids safer, then absolutely i will be with them
 
Point and case

The fact that many on the economic left, want the Constitution at least changed if not completely replaced, is evidence that it should be,

Only conservatives want to conserve an 18th century relic.
They could still keep the (current) Constitution but it would be in a museum, not in any law book.
 
if that is what it takes to make our kids safer, then absolutely i will be with them
:lamo

Except it doesnt make ANYONE safer and you know that. But you will be their Neville...not to keep kids safe...but because its what you are.

but at least you can admit that your "I'm a gun owner!" foot stomping bull**** was just that and you are as committed to banning guns as any other anti-gun leftist. You took a nice dump on your 'gun owner' credibility.
 
The fact that many on the economic left, want the Constitution at least changed if not completely replaced, is evidence that it should be,

Only conservatives want to conserve an 18th century relic.
They could still keep the (current) Constitution but it would be in a museum, not in any law book.

an 18th century relic is the foundation of all democracy in the world
 
an 18th century relic is the foundation of all democracy in the world

Americans are prone to making stupid parochial statements.

Name another democratic country that bases its democracy on that of the USA



Have you never heard of the English Civil War or the English Revolution ? (both in the 17th century)
Does the world "parliament" mean anything to you ?


Only in America do they think they invented democracy.
 
=justabubba;1071542051]absurd. have been a gun owner since i was 9 years young (.410), 58+ years
Damn, I mean just damn. Not doubt you are a serious gun owner.
NO confiscation from homes will be needed
As long as you have to do it (if asked)? Or period.
they are not a menace to the public if they remain in the home
In public the only way my firearms are menacing is, if in the hurry to runaway and hide the fool trips over his feet and bust his face face open.
on the street. surrender it or be willing to pull its trigger to try to hold on to it (if it's on the list turtledude laughed at)
Surrender it sure if you're committing a crime then odds are you won't. Walking down the street holstered or slung I doubt most cops could care less, unless they had a panicked anti gunner call in about someone with a gun acting suspicious.
and yea, people who parade around showing off their weapons are ******s
And if you had an AK-47 or AR-15 so would you given the chance. But you got your .410 so... Which with 000 is a good home defense weapon.
 
...and if you had an AK-47 or AR-15 so would you given the chance. But you got your .410 so... Which with 000 is a good home defense weapon.

If you had an AK-47 (legal that is), why would you want to walk around with it scaring people ?
 
That is not the bill Turtledude posted. Yours if from 2018, his is from 2020. Yours is from the 115th congress,his from the 116th congress. Different cosponsors.

This is from Turtledude's post.18 cosponsors no RINOs.
Cosponsors - H.R.5717 - 116th Congress (2019-2020): Gun Violence Prevention and Community Safety Act of 2020 | Congress.gov | Library of Congress
\All Info - H.R.5717 - 115th Congress (2017-2018): Jake Laird Act of 2018 | Congress.gov | Library of Congress

This is from yours.15 cosponsors with a lot of RINOs
All Info - H.R.5717 - 115th Congress (2017-2018): Jake Laird Act of 2018 | Congress.gov | Library of Congress
Do you know if there any major differences between the two versions?
 
All the sponsors currently are Democrats. The chance of this getting passed is almost zero, but it shows what many Democrats want to impose on this Country

Text - H.R.5717 - 116th Congress (2019-2020): Gun Violence Prevention and Community Safety Act of 2020 | Congress.gov | Library of Congress

the biggest joke is listing hundreds of firearms-many of which are obsolete and no longer relevant as NOT banned.

They left my Mini 30 and 14, proof these guys are idiots. Yes, it is DOA before it starts
 
Last edited:
They left my Min 30 and 14, proof these guys are idiots. Yes, it is DOA before it starts

I think the more clever of the turds that push that nonsense, are hoping that it allows them to get lesser restrictions as "more reasonable"
 
i'm not anti-gun for responsible adults, but getting the orange moron voted out is my top issue. we can worry about hobbies later.

Democrats are throwing this election, so good luck.
 
What about the "turds" who oppose it ?

opposing restrictions on constitutional rights never makes one a turd. politicians who do want to restrict our rights I have little use for.I am talking about political operatives-not ordinary citizens or even posters
 
my guess is that the hobby won't be disrupted no matter who wins. there's too much money in it.
My gun isn't for use as a hobby. I do not participate in gun sports or hunting. MY AR-15 is for 4-legged critter control, and my handgun is for 2-legged critter control.
 
Last edited:
Democrats are throwing this election, so good luck.

Maybe but I think some of them are banking on the current unrest to help senile Joe
 
Democrats are throwing this election, so good luck.

Hopefully enough anti-Tweetyborg independents like me will bite the bullet (pun intended) and show up. My guess is that if Biden wins, no one is going to show up and tell backyard Rambos that they can no longer hobby with their boomsticks.
 
If you had an AK-47 (legal that is), why would you want to walk around with it scaring people ?

a desire to scare people

a belief that some might be scared but figuring most won't?

or no desire to scare people but realizing that some irrational folks might be scared?

presentation is everything.
 
Hopefully enough anti-Tweetyborg independents like me will bite the bullet (pun intended) and show up. My guess is that if Biden wins, no one is going to show up and tell backyard Rambos that they can no longer hobby with their boomsticks.

You made a post a while back that really resonated with me personally, Helix. " Nutters ruin it for the class ", or something very close to those words. There's a LOT of truth in those words.
 
Hopefully enough anti-Tweetyborg independents like me will bite the bullet (pun intended) and show up. My guess is that if Biden wins, no one is going to show up and tell backyard Rambos that they can no longer hobby with their boomsticks.

Biden will try to appoint judges who would allow state governments to ban and confiscate "broomsticks" that cause liberals to be fearful or hateful
 
Back
Top Bottom