- Joined
- Dec 3, 2011
- Messages
- 1,154
- Reaction score
- 432
- Location
- Kingdom of Nigh
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
Personally, I don't disagree. I'm just pointing out the existing precedent. For right or for wrong, because of the long-standing precedent, it has to be included in the discussion.
Precedent isnt law. Precedent is the decision of one specific case under specific circumstances and needs to be treated as such rather than be treated as gospel for all cases as the courts do now.