Constitutional terms, do they have meaning, do they have weight?

[Rich2018]

lol. it just is under our form of Capitalism. it is a Poverty of Capital to circulate among the Poor that is the problem. Equal protection of the laws can promote our general welfare in this case.

You mean the government doesn't tax enough and redirect those tax dollars to medicare.

You still keep talking about general and common welfare like you understand the difference.

 

[danielpalos]

You mean the government doesn't tax enough and redirect those tax dollars to medicare.

You still keep talking about general and common welfare like you understand the difference.

I think we are overtaxed already. Public policies should promote the general welfare and general prosperity with positive multiplier effect. Two or more means those types of public policies can pay for themselves. A welfare-State can be more market friendly, unlike a right wing warfare-State.

 

[Rich2018]

I think we are overtaxed already. Public policies should promote the general welfare and general prosperity with positive multiplier effect. Two or more means those types of public policies can pay for themselves. A welfare-State can be more market friendly, unlike a right wing warfare-State.

Please explain how a public policy can pay for itself (without new taxes that is)

 

[danielpalos]

Please explain how a public policy can pay for itself (without new taxes that is)

With a multiplier of Two or more. Meaning that for every one dollar invested in that public policy, two dollars in economic activity is generated.

 

[Rich2018]

With a multiplier of Two or more. Meaning that for every one dollar invested in that public policy, two dollars in economic activity is generated.

Such as ?

Could you give an EXAMPLE of such a public policy ?

I know you have REPEATABLY refused to gives examples before to illustrate your understanding of government concepts.

 

[danielpalos]

Such as ?

Could you give an EXAMPLE of such a public policy ?

I know you have REPEATABLY refused to gives examples before to illustrate your understanding of government concepts.

lol. I know you have Repeatedly refused to eschew appealing to ignorance of express Constitutional law, economics, and ethics.

Unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States is such a policy.

 

[Rich2018]

lol. I know you have Repeatedly refused to eschew appealing to ignorance of express Constitutional law, economics, and ethics.

As stated in another thread, an appeal to ignorance is one of 15 fallacies in debate, I seriously doubt you can explain any of them or know when they apply.

Case in point is above

But go on, explain what an appeal to ignorance fallacy is and how it applies in this case.

Unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States is such a policy.

So is the policy of paying unemployment compensation a "general" or "common" policy and why ?

 

[danielpalos]

As stated in another thread, an appeal to ignorance is one of 15 fallacies in debate, I seriously doubt you can explain any of them or know when they apply.

Case in point is above

But go on, explain what an appeal to ignorance fallacy is and how it applies in this case.




So is the policy of paying unemployment compensation a "general" or "common" policy and why ?

It should be a general policy since the 1930's when it was introduced by the legislature.

The common law can render it a more equitable public policy.

 

[Rich2018]

It should be a general policy since the 1930's when it was introduced by the legislature.

The common law can render it a more equitable public policy.

So you admit you used an argument from ignorance incorrectly or didn't know what it means ?

What makes it a "general" policy, what changes would have to be made to make it a "common" policy ?

 

[danielpalos]

So you admit you used an argument from ignorance incorrectly or didn't know what it means ?

What makes it a "general" policy, what changes would have to be made to make it a "common" policy ?

We have co-equal branches of Government. The judicial branch is vested with the judicial Power of the United States.

 

[Rich2018]

We have co-equal branches of Government. The judicial branch is vested with the judicial Power of the United States.

We have 27 amendments to the Constitution, the first 10 are termed the Bill of Rights.



Do you admit you used an argument from ignorance incorrectly or didn't know what it means ?

What makes it a "general" policy, what changes would have to be made to make it a "common" policy ?

 

[danielpalos]

We have 27 amendments to the Constitution, the first 10 are termed the Bill of Rights.



Do you admit you used an argument from ignorance incorrectly or didn't know what it means ?

What makes it a "general" policy, what changes would have to be made to make it a "common" policy ?

lol. I used terms that you are too incompetent to understand.

 

[Rich2018]

lol. I used terms that you are too incompetent to understand.

Nope as stated before you repeat thing you have heard but have absolutely no understanding of.

You always dodge challenges to show you understand



So, do you admit you used the "argument from ignorance" incorrectly or didn't know what it means ?
If not, what does it mean ?

It should be a general policy since the 1930's when it was introduced by the legislature.

The common law can render it a more equitable public policy.

What makes it a "general" policy, what changes would have to be made to make it a "common" policy ?

 

[danielpalos]

Nope as stated before you repeat thing you have heard but have absolutely no understanding of.

You always dodge challenges to show you understand



So, do you admit you used the "argument from ignorance" incorrectly or didn't know what it means ?
If not, what does it mean ?





What makes it a "general" policy, what changes would have to be made to make it a "common" policy ?

I explained that in a previous post, which you ignored like usual.

 

[Rich2018]

I explained that in a previous post, which you ignored like usual.

You you didn't

You repeat thing you have heard but have absolutely no understanding of and always refuse to give examples to show your understanding


1. Do you admit you used the "argument from ignorance" incorrectly or don't know what it means ?
If not, what does it mean ?

2. What makes it a "general" policy, what changes would have to be made to make it a "common" policy ?

 

[danielpalos]

You you didn't

You repeat thing you have heard but have absolutely no understanding of and always refuse to give examples to show your understanding


1. Do you admit you used the "argument from ignorance" incorrectly or don't know what it means ?
If not, what does it mean ?

2. What makes it a "general" policy, what changes would have to be made to make it a "common" policy ?

I explained it previously. If I have to go back and post the post number, it is Because you are simply too incompetent to understand the argument. Your choice.

 

[Rich2018]

I explained it previously. If I have to go back and post the post number, it is Because you are simply too incompetent to understand the argument. Your choice.

NO YOU HAVEN'T

You repeat thing you have heard but but you have absolutely no understanding of it and repeatedly refuse to give examples to show your understanding


1. Do you admit you used the "argument from ignorance" incorrectly or don't know what it means ?
If not, what does it mean ?

2. What makes it a "general" policy, what changes would have to be made to make it a "common" policy ?


Can you answer either of those questions ?

 

[danielpalos]

NO YOU HAVEN'T

You repeat thing you have heard but but you have absolutely no understanding of it and repeatedly refuse to give examples to show your understanding


1. Do you admit you used the "argument from ignorance" incorrectly or don't know what it means ?
If not, what does it mean ?

2. What makes it a "general" policy, what changes would have to be made to make it a "common" policy ?


Can you answer either of those questions ?

You are the one appealing to ignorance and claiming you are right. In right wing fantasy, you are Always right.

Besides, it is about the scope of the powers. Our welfare clause is General not limited or common and must cover any contingency not expressly provided for. Only Congress is delegated the authority to legislate for the general welfare. Common powers are usually adjudicated via the judicial Power of the United States.

Any given public policy can be subject to either of those branches of Government; the legislature enacts public policy which is then subject to adjudication via the common law for equity and law purposes.

 

[Rich2018]

You are the one appealing to ignorance...

Can you give a definition of the "appeal to ignorance" and an example of it ?

....Our welfare clause is General not limited or common and must cover any contingency not expressly provided for. Only Congress is delegated the authority to legislate for the general welfare....

Meaningless drivel

Until you can give an example of both it remains a phrase you do not understand.


Do you know what an EXAMPLE is ?

 

[danielpalos]

Can you give a definition of the "appeal to ignorance" and an example of it ?




Meaningless drivel

Until you can give an example of both it remains a phrase you do not understand.


Do you know what an EXAMPLE is ?

I posted this already; you conveniently ignored it.

It is about the scope of the powers. Our welfare clause is General not limited or common and must cover any contingency not expressly provided for. Only Congress is delegated the authority to legislate for the general welfare. Common powers are usually adjudicated via the judicial Power of the United States.

Any given public policy can be subject to either of those branches of Government; the legislature enacts public policy which is then subject to adjudication via the common law for equity and law purposes.

 

[Rich2018]

I posted this already; you conveniently ignored it.

It is about the scope of the powers. Our welfare clause is General not limited or common and must cover any contingency not expressly provided for. Only Congress is delegated the authority to legislate for the general welfare. Common powers are usually adjudicated via the judicial Power of the United States.

Any given public policy can be subject to either of those branches of Government; the legislature enacts public policy which is then subject to adjudication via the common law for equity and law purposes.

Do you know what an EXAMPLE means ?

 

[danielpalos]

Do you know what an EXAMPLE means ?

Yes, I do. What part of my explanation did you not understand as a practicable example at law?

 

[Rich2018]

Yes, I do. What part of my explanation did you not understand as a practicable example at law?

I want you to give me an Example

You say you know what is meant by this....so far you've just regurgitated meaningless words.

 

[danielpalos]

I want you to give me an Example

You say you know what is meant by this....so far you've just regurgitated meaningless words.

lol. Only "rebels without a cause", say that.

 

[Rich2018]

lol. Only "rebels without a cause", say that.

So you don't know what an example is ?