• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Conservative refuse to admit these facts are true

I didn't call you stupid. I commented on your failure to grasp logic.

You're also assuming I'm pro life...i'm not. I'm pro choice, always have been. The thread title and first post made a statement and asked a question. I answered.

I'll reiterate...conservatives refuse to acknowledge your facts, because they aren't facts...they're opinions.

In a woman's OPINION, they did the correct thing in getting an abortion.

You've stated a series of facts regarding women's opinions, and then called them facts.

In my opinion, I made the right choice in selling my Honda civic to buy a.Chevy corvette. Its faster. Ergo, I did the right thing.

Is that a fact?

If 7 out of 10 men say they believe that selling their Honda Civic to by a CC was the right choice...then that is a correct, factual statement: "that many men believe that action was the right choice."

This is the barely coherent and grammatically inept speech of a man who desperately wants to be able to claim that he "cured coronavirus."

That's it, in a nutshell. When we do get a handle on this crisis, he wants to be able to pull out footage and declare "I called it! I said use this! I said try this! I told them to do this, it was my idea!" He's just doing it with lots of stupid stuff because he doesnt want to miss an opportunity. He's afraid 'the big one' will be mentioned and he wont get credit for it.

It's all about declaring himself the savior of the cv crisis and we'll hear all about it, esp in his campaign. (Which is basically each of his press briefings these days) --- Lursa
 
Just because something leaves you better off doesn't make it the "right" thing to have done.

The question was about "what she believes."

This is the barely coherent and grammatically inept speech of a man who desperately wants to be able to claim that he "cured coronavirus."

That's it, in a nutshell. When we do get a handle on this crisis, he wants to be able to pull out footage and declare "I called it! I said use this! I said try this! I told them to do this, it was my idea!" He's just doing it with lots of stupid stuff because he doesnt want to miss an opportunity. He's afraid 'the big one' will be mentioned and he wont get credit for it.

It's all about declaring himself the savior of the cv crisis and we'll hear all about it, esp in his campaign. (Which is basically each of his press briefings these days) --- Lursa
 
No, my argument makes a woman's ability to think for themself irrelevant.

Because even dependants deserve the right to body autonomy.

Yes, they do.

But if you classify the unborn as 'dependents,' then no. Dependent kids, elderly, disabled all have a 'right' to bodily autonomy. Guaranteed by the Const. The unborn are not included in that.

A woman has a right to bodily autonomy. How does the suggestion that the unborn have a right to bodily autonomy outweigh a woman's right to the same?

This is the barely coherent and grammatically inept speech of a man who desperately wants to be able to claim that he "cured coronavirus."

That's it, in a nutshell. When we do get a handle on this crisis, he wants to be able to pull out footage and declare "I called it! I said use this! I said try this! I told them to do this, it was my idea!" He's just doing it with lots of stupid stuff because he doesnt want to miss an opportunity. He's afraid 'the big one' will be mentioned and he wont get credit for it.

It's all about declaring himself the savior of the cv crisis and we'll hear all about it, esp in his campaign. (Which is basically each of his press briefings these days) --- Lursa
 
A woman having an abortion IS handling the repercussions. You just don't like the way she is handling it. So she IS responsible.

:applaud:applaud:applaud

Of course she is!

This is the barely coherent and grammatically inept speech of a man who desperately wants to be able to claim that he "cured coronavirus."

That's it, in a nutshell. When we do get a handle on this crisis, he wants to be able to pull out footage and declare "I called it! I said use this! I said try this! I told them to do this, it was my idea!" He's just doing it with lots of stupid stuff because he doesnt want to miss an opportunity. He's afraid 'the big one' will be mentioned and he wont get credit for it.

It's all about declaring himself the savior of the cv crisis and we'll hear all about it, esp in his campaign. (Which is basically each of his press briefings these days) --- Lursa
 
Yeah..no.

Already proven, for you.

You have yet to disprove it.

This is the barely coherent and grammatically inept speech of a man who desperately wants to be able to claim that he "cured coronavirus."

That's it, in a nutshell. When we do get a handle on this crisis, he wants to be able to pull out footage and declare "I called it! I said use this! I said try this! I told them to do this, it was my idea!" He's just doing it with lots of stupid stuff because he doesnt want to miss an opportunity. He's afraid 'the big one' will be mentioned and he wont get credit for it.

It's all about declaring himself the savior of the cv crisis and we'll hear all about it, esp in his campaign. (Which is basically each of his press briefings these days) --- Lursa
 
A gift that is intended for married people only.

According to you, you didnt care if your wife enjoyed that gift or not.

This is the barely coherent and grammatically inept speech of a man who desperately wants to be able to claim that he "cured coronavirus."

That's it, in a nutshell. When we do get a handle on this crisis, he wants to be able to pull out footage and declare "I called it! I said use this! I said try this! I told them to do this, it was my idea!" He's just doing it with lots of stupid stuff because he doesnt want to miss an opportunity. He's afraid 'the big one' will be mentioned and he wont get credit for it.

It's all about declaring himself the savior of the cv crisis and we'll hear all about it, esp in his campaign. (Which is basically each of his press briefings these days) --- Lursa
 
Wow...you may feel that way, but I know enough women to know that's not true. There are many that dont 'regret it' but wouldnt do it again.

it's a fine distinction...but it's reality.
There are many women that don't regret having an abortion but wouldn't do it again.
 
If 7 out of 10 men say they believe that selling their Honda Civic to by a CC was the right choice...then that is a correct, factual statement: "that many men believe that action was the right choice."

Believe =/= fact.
 
There are many women that don't regret having an abortion but wouldn't do it again.

Yeah? So?

Life is full of one time choices. I don't regret getting married. But if my wife died, I wouldn't do it again.

At least I have the right to make that decision.
 
Actually yea, even if you do not like it.

Yea...no. If your poor decisions result in you taking an innocent human life then you are factually not responsible even if left wing nutters tell you that you are.
 
Instead of just saying "Yeah no" why don't you discuss why you don't think a woman is dealing with an unwanted pregnancy by getting an abortion. Why do you feel this way? Why does it matter to you? You don't know the women. You don't know her situation. her family, their resources, the emotional environment of the family. Can you do something to make it so the situation is OK for you?

I've heard 2nd graders give more sophisticated answers then "Yeah, no". Surely you could do better than a 2nd grader.

Already posted....but just curious if you know of any 2nd graders that think killing innocent humans is responsible. Show me one that agrees with you.
 
Already posted....but just curious if you know of any 2nd graders that think killing innocent humans is responsible. Show me one that agrees with you.

Given the above intellectual level; feel free to save your self the effort of posting any discussion about the topic.
 
If your poor decisions
Stay the **** out of other people's lives because it is none of your ****ing business and nobody put you in charge to make decisions about other people's lives and what is or is not a poor or good decision.
 
Yea...no. If your poor decisions result in you taking an innocent human life then you are factually not responsible even if left wing nutters tell you that you are.

And the right wing nutters are telling you ......... what? That you have the right to tell women they are killers and pass laws denying them their right to manage their lives in ways that are responsible for their families, themselves and eventually for the potential child.

So which nutters are the nuttiest: the one's allowing women to buy safe, legal abortifacients or the crazed anti-abortion nutters, like Alpha, that have a hot burning need to punish women for buying safe legal abortifacients?
 
So which nutters are the nuttiest: the one's allowing women to buy safe, legal abortifacients or the crazed anti-abortion nutters, like Alpha, that have a hot burning need to punish women for buying safe legal abortifacients?

The second group, no doubt about it. I find those nutters to be the nuttiest.
 
The second group, no doubt about it. I find those nutters to be the nuttiest.

Nutters provide moments of hysterical laughter in life. They're kinda fun ................ until they start electing people and making laws.
 
Stay the **** out of other people's lives because it is none of your ****ing business and nobody put you in charge to make decisions about other people's lives and what is or is not a poor or good decision.

Says the mask pushing statue fighting crowd.
 
Says the mask pushing statue fighting crowd.

Right wearing a masks is a political statement. Most of us think masks prevent the spread of virus, keep down the death rate, and give ourselves a 65% chance of not getting the virus. By not wearing a mask you will, hopefully, improve the gene pool.
 
Right wearing a masks is a political statement. Most of us think masks prevent the spread of virus, keep down the death rate, and give ourselves a 65% chance of not getting the virus. By not wearing a mask you will, hopefully, improve the gene pool.

Lets test that. Lefties protested in massive crowds across America for weeks. Did you denounce them for spreading covid? Lets hope so, otherwise you are going to be a proven bull**** artist. Just show us one post where you denounced them.
 
Lets test that. Lefties protested in massive crowds across America for weeks. Did you denounce them for spreading covid? Lets hope so, otherwise you are going to be a proven bull**** artist. Just show us one post where you denounced them.

LOL. you can't scorn masks and the people that wear them in one post and then complain that they aren't wearing them the next.
 
LOL. you can't scorn masks and the people that wear them in one post and then complain that they aren't wearing them the next.

I'm not scorning mask wearers...I'm scorning mask pushers. Now where is your post denouncing protestors for spreading disease?
 
Believe =/= fact.

Are you saying that a person that makes a decision in their own best interests...and that ends up being true for them...and knows it (believes it) is wrong?

So then no one is ever right? Or wrong? Please. Only the individual woman knows if it was the right decision for her...anyone who 'believed' differently would be wrong...their opinion/belief cannot assume to know or understand the entirety of her circumstances, beliefs, her decision.

This is the barely coherent and grammatically inept speech of a man who desperately wants to be able to claim that he "cured coronavirus."

That's it, in a nutshell. When we do get a handle on this crisis, he wants to be able to pull out footage and declare "I called it! I said use this! I said try this! I told them to do this, it was my idea!" He's just doing it with lots of stupid stuff because he doesnt want to miss an opportunity. He's afraid 'the big one' will be mentioned and he wont get credit for it.

It's all about declaring himself the savior of the cv crisis and we'll hear all about it, esp in his campaign. (Which is basically each of his press briefings these days) --- Lursa
 
Back
Top Bottom