• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Confederate monuments[W:1182]

Re: Confederate monuments

are you still going to call the civil war a war of insurrection...no!.... i don't see you wanting to be shown to be wrong again.

You are always, always wrong.

The US Congress, US Presidents and the US Supreme Court defined the Confederate states in a state of insurrection.

You have been shown this about 40 times now. You are just too enormously stilted to grasp those facts.

The readers of this thread are fully aware of your enormous embarrassment. Suck it up, chuck.
 
Re: Confederate monuments

Which, of course, is only to be expected. Why on earth would we just turn over control of the southern states to the same people who lead their half baked revolt?

Of course, that's what we did far too soon, and loyal Americans paid for it.

did not make that argument, but many think the south went back to what is was right after the war, and the south did not control it own affairs for years
 
Re: Confederate monuments

You are always, always wrong.

The US Congress, US Presidents and the US Supreme Court defined the Confederate states in a state of insurrection.

You have been shown this about 40 times now. You are just too enormously stilted to grasp those facts.

The readers of this thread are fully aware of your enormous embarrassment. Suck it up, chuck.




its funny to see your posting buck the federal government library of congress and all the other links i posted, but you go ahead an keep trying.

 
Last edited:
Re: Confederate monuments

Post CW events do suggest the north should have occupied the south for several more decades at the least.

True. At least that way African Americans and loyal Americans would have had their basic human rights maintained.
 
Re: Confederate monuments

Moderator's Warning:
Let's stop with the personal commentary and stick to the topic of the thread. Which is about Confederate Monuments. Not other posters.
 
Re: Confederate monuments

did not make that argument, but many think the south went back to what is was right after the war, and the south did not control it own affairs for years

What?

"Many think the south went back to what is was right"?

So white supremacism and depriving American citizens of their constitutional rights and often outright murdering them is what's "right"?

Think about what you said for a minute.

Seeing as within twenty years of the war ending the south was back in control if it's affairs, that statement is false.
 
Re: Confederate monuments

What?

"Many think the south went back to what is was right"?

So white supremacism and depriving American citizens of their constitutional rights and often outright murdering them is what's "right"?

Think about what you said for a minute.

Seeing as within twenty years of the war ending the south was back in control if it's affairs, that statement is false.

you need to remember who do you think was running the state governments after the war for years, the north..[which is what i meant]...the passing of the 13- 14 -15th amendments
 
Re: Confederate monuments

you need to remember who do you think was running the state governments after the war for years, the north..[which is what i meant]...the passing of the 13- 14 -15th amendments

No, after the end of Reconstruction, control of the southern states was passed back to the southern states, who often gleefully ignored or delibrately misinterpreted those amendments.
 
Re: Confederate monuments

Well substitutions was a time honored tradition in American armies, elite slave owners and businessmen could buy a replacement to serve in their stead during our glorious insurrection back in 17 70...ahhh something like that... so from before we were a Republic the elite could opt out but enjoy the benefits.

But let's not forget the South allowed the rich to buy a substitute as well, and the price tag was a pretty penny more than a Yankee's replacement...

I kinda lost track of the beef, but if it's about the elite having an advantage over the common man, the late enlistees were promised land in 'The Ohio' in exchange for service, when it came time to collect on that promise the new government gave that land to the speculators who held IOUs. So those who risked their lives had to buy any Ohio land from those who risked some money.

The definitions of both words use both words so not real sure why the quibble over the terms... :peace

You are talking to the ultimate quibbler.

Po PO man seems to think that because the rebels were....rebels...(which no one argues) it was, simply....a ...rebellion (der) it was not also an insurrection.

The rebels were the actors, the Confederate states were also insurgents. He thinks this matters dearly to his def - in -ish - shuns. Even though there is a hellalota synonymoussssnnnnesss.

It has been shown to him repeatedly -- it was both, and very clearly -- by the US Congress, by numerous Proclamations by two presidents, (approved by Congress), by numerous Supreme Court rulings, it was such, he holds onto this bizarre definition of "it was a rebellion!!" dammit, as if it matters.
 
Last edited:
Re: Confederate monuments

Those defending keeping The Monuments were they have been are bigots and racist

I guess that I am a northern bigot who had have family members die in the civil war as I do not agree with such actions as taking Robert E Lee monument down as he was one of the greatest military minds born in the US.

I share President Grant respect for the man as a matter of fact.
 
Re: Confederate monuments

here is a link to a monument in my home town, where I was born & raised, where I grew up

https://www.nps.gov/nr/feature/places/pdfs/13001124.pdf

hopefully this very small piece of history will not be destroyed by those that are afraid of history

Shreveport, Louisiana was the headquarter of The Trans-Mississippi Department

once a people destroy history then history ceases to be, and those that seek to remember history and learn from that history will no longer remember, nor learn

No, I am not a racist but history needs to be preserved

be careful of the ignorance wished for
 
Re: Confederate monuments

here is a link to a monument ...

Here's another.


6f6b17d4-a13d-456d-9d33-9b0e487d77c6-banner.jpg

quote_icon.png
Originally Posted by cuban smokes

history gave Lincoln what he deserved .................. a box & a grave ................
No, I am not a racist but history needs to be preserved

be careful of the ignorance wished for

Indeed.
 
Re: Confederate monuments

So you think its the North that is holding civil war grudges? :lol:

Its nothing in comparison to Southerners' grudges about it. Not even close.

The anti-South are the folks erasing all Confederate symbolism. Not the other way around. No one has demanded that Joshua Chamberlain's statue be removed from Bowden College.
 
Re: Confederate monuments

Which, of course, is only to be expected. Why on earth would we just turn over control of the southern states to the same people who lead their half baked revolt?

Of course, that's what we did far too soon, and loyal Americans paid for it.

Most of the great Generals of the 20th Century were Southerners and most of those were sons of Confederate veterans. Seeing how their talent during WW2 was priceless, it's a good thing Reconstruction didn't last any longer than it did.
 
Re: Confederate monuments

here is a link to a monument in my home town, where I was born & raised, where I grew up

https://www.nps.gov/nr/feature/places/pdfs/13001124.pdf

hopefully this very small piece of history will not be destroyed by those that are afraid of history

Shreveport, Louisiana was the headquarter of The Trans-Mississippi Department

once a people destroy history then history ceases to be, and those that seek to remember history and learn from that history will no longer remember, nor learn

No, I am not a racist but history needs to be preserved

be careful of the ignorance wished for


nothing is being destroyed you are making crap up
 
Re: Confederate monuments

I guess that I am a northern bigot who had have family members die in the civil war as I do not agree with such actions as taking Robert E Lee monument down as he was one of the greatest military minds born in the US.

I share President Grant respect for the man as a matter of fact.


yes, your post is certainly racist
 
Re: Confederate monuments

nothing is being destroyed you are making crap up

yes, cowards in flak jackets, helmets, and mask covering their faces are destroying history, in the dead of night, and folks are making crap up?

LOL ............ what a .... wad .................
 
Last edited:
Re: Confederate monuments

Most of the great Generals of the 20th Century were Southerners and most of those were sons of Confederate veterans. Seeing how their talent during WW2 was priceless, it's a good thing Reconstruction didn't last any longer than it did.


A lot of blacks would likely disagree with you but then they dont matter do they.
 
Re: Confederate monuments

no, thats no correct, insurrection and rebellion mean two different things

here is what the federal govenrment calls the war:

Actually the federal government could use either word, if you care to look at any definitions they both use each other when describing the activity. Rebellion had several different definitions depending on the degree of organization.

Seems a silly point to argue about, but then again it is the internet... :peace
 
Back
Top Bottom